By Dan Callahan
[Revolutionary Road opens December 26th in limited release; wide release in January.]
Richard Yates’ debut novel Revolutionary Road is a suitably bleak vision of fifties suburbia and Madison Avenue soullessness, but it’s much more than that; as Yates remorselessly tightens the screws around Frank and April Wheeler, his trapped central couple, the book pile-drives you into imagining how their helpless self-deception and character flaws, all laid out in punishing, inescapably believable detail for the reader, lead them inexorably to a conclusion so immaculate and terrible that it has the ordained feel of a Greek tragedy. Yates’ technique as a writer is brutally commanding throughout. There’s a late scene in Revolutionary Road where the madman son of Mrs. Givings, the Wheelers’ intrusive realtor, laces into the couple with such viciously pinpoint accuracy that I had to keep putting the book down to recover after every one of his verbal grenades.
In truth, when I finished the book, I wanted to find any pretext possible to shake off and deny its pessimistic vision of life. Yates lacks humor and compassion, and there’s a questionable scene or two involving Frank’s office co-worker Maureen Grube, who briefly becomes his mistress, but in the end, I had to accept the fact that Revolutionary Road was going to haunt me. There was no chink in its armor that would let me duck its level, pitiless gaze; there is no point where this book does not see you and tell you the despairing (boozy?) truth about yourself and the people in your life. I kept thinking about April Wheeler as if I had known her and had somehow let her down. Even writing her name hurts me. She’s “only” on the page, but she still lives there, alive and fighting. She says “fuck you” to it all and goes down with the ship of her ideals.
Yates let’s us see that April Wheeler (the name he chose for her spells out all her aimless potential) has an adolescent kind of triumph over her husband, all the while making us feel that she is cornered like an animal and cannot possibly make any other choice. He insists that we cannot change our nature and that life’s winners are generally the people who can lie to themselves at all times. These are both fairly standard verities; where Yates is truly depressing, however, is in his insight into how life’s losers need to tell themselves smaller, more degrading versions of the winner’s lies in order to simply survive; in the world of this book, the losers on display don’t even get to have any compensating pride, as they do, for instance, in the essential novels of Dawn Powell.
If Sam Mendes’ film version of Revolutionary Road reminds me of anything it is William Wyler’s films of Henry James and Theodore Dreiser, The Heiress (1949) and Carrie (1952). Wyler has no strong point of view as a film director; like Mendes, he’s basically there to serve the material and the actors, but when the material provided is as strong as James and Dreiser and Yates, and the actors are well-matched with their roles (who can forget the gasp-worthy intensity of Laurence Olivier’s George Hurstwood in Carrie, or Ralph Richardson’s Dr. Sloper in The Heiress?) it’s fine to simply get out of the way. Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet are perfectly cast as the Wheelers, and even their shortcomings as actors (they’re both weak vocally at times) do not stop them from totally immersing themselves in the world of the book.
The screenplay by Justin Haythe is a model of literary adaptation, and it even improves on the book sometimes. Yates’ handling of the flashbacks to the Wheelers’ youth can be slightly clunky, and Haythe gives you the information you need about them in a much smoother fashion; he also wisely eliminates Frank’s uncomfortably nasty last scene with Maureen Grube. Haythe does not even falter with the tricky first scene of the book, where Yates describes a catastrophic amateur production of Robert Sherwood’s The Petrified Forest and plots the steady deterioration of April’s performance on stage in the lead with an overwhelming kind of “and it kept getting even worse” fascination. It’s a superbly written opening gambit but probably impossible to stage, not to mention perilously difficult for Winslet, who would have to show some kind of theatrical promise at first and then gradually lose confidence until she was acting very badly. It’s too tall an order, really, so Haythe just gives you a brief, stabbing glimpse of her failure at the curtain call and Frank’s reaction, as well as the reaction of the audience, and this economy works well.
The Petrified Forest fiasco isn’t the film’s first scene; we initially see a potent glimpse of Frank and April’s first youthful meeting, and DiCaprio and Winslet unleash all the chemistry they had in Titanic (1997) for a few indelibly charged seconds. They look like movie stars, and surely that’s the way the Wheelers see themselves at this moment, so that the iconography of the actors is being used in the smartest possible way. The casting is ideal all down the line: how can I begin to describe the pleasure I took in Kathy Bates’ performance as Mrs. Givings? Some of the best sections of Yates’ book concern Mrs. Givings’ sadly paltry inner life, and there’s no way for the film to give you that sense of her, not even in dialogue, yet all of it is there in Kathy Bates’ eyes, all of this woman’s confusion and hurt feelings and fear, which she tries to conceal with a steady stream of cheerful, slightly pretentious small talk.
DiCaprio and Winslet are uncomfortable with some of their heightened dialogue in their early scenes, but both of them start to catch fire midway through. Frank Wheeler is basically a complete jerk who has a mean knack for always saying the wrong thing to his wife, and DiCaprio nails his sense of entitlement and his empty salesman soul, while Winslet carries the best scene in the film, April’s soul-baring confession to Shep (David Harbour), a married friend who is intensely in love with her. When she comes on to Shep and sleeps with him in the backseat of his car, it’s clear that this is a dream come true for him and an act of annihilating desperation for her, and this comes very close indeed to the astringent, clear-eyed pain of Yates’ book. I miss the extremely telling back story about April’s neglected childhood with her mainly absent playboy/flapper parents, and especially the last remembered scene with her father which turns the book’s final screw of hopelessness right into April Wheeler’s heart, and ours. Still, this is the best film version of this major book that I can imagine.
Revolutionary Road is not a great film, per se; a great film needs the stamp of a great director. But it is a great film of this great book, just as The Heiress and Carrie are strictly great films of their great sources. This is such a rare thing that we can surely loosen our aesthetic criteria to accommodate it, just as we can love the film version of a play like Carson McCullers’s The Member of the Wedding (1952) because it preserves a great theater piece without going into the neutral directorial style of the movie’s director, Fred Zinnemann. Haythe and Mendes step out of Richard Yates’ way, just as Zinnemann ceded the screen to McCullers and Julie Harris. I don’t want to see David Lynch’s Revolutionary Road, or Jean-Luc Godard’s Revolutionary Road. They might make a great work in their own right, but it would necessarily alter and even mangle an already existing great work, and this would inevitably be a kind of desecration.
Emblematic of this film’s success is the last scene, which follows the book exactly: Mrs. Givings sits with her husband (Richard Easton) and chats about the Wheelers, all the while stroking a puppy on her lap. Now, we aren’t told that Mrs. Givings bought the puppy to assuage her guilt about the Wheelers; there’s no way to do that without several short scenes, and the film can’t waste that kind of time. But that damned puppy is there on screen, all the same, and for those who have read the book, its meaning leaps out at us. Mrs. Givings is a truly awful woman. She is also completely understandable and even sympathetic. We know her, as we know all the people in Revolutionary Road, book and now film. We know Mrs. Givings because we’ve met her, and because her heartless pragmatism is a part of human nature as constant as the romanticism of April Wheeler. There is no place to hide from Yates’ story, on the page or on screen. He doesn’t want you to drop your lies and defenses, because he says you can’t; he simply shines a harsh spotlight on them and eyes them like a surgeon longing for a drink.
_________________________________________________
House contributor Dan Callahan's writing has appeared in Slant Magazine, Bright Lights Film Journal and Senses of Cinema, among other publications.
Wild is the Wind: Revolutionary Road
Monday, December 15, 2008
Wild is the Wind: Revolutionary Road
Labels:
Dan Callahan,
Movie Reviews,
New Releases (Theater)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comments:
I disliked "Revolutionary Road" the film, but that fact makes me want to read the source material even more. The attitude(s) you describe of Yates in the book feels like that which I sensed was missing on screen. I've liked some of Sam Mendes' work in the past, but I'm not sure he could have ever been right for the material (his smirk, if you will, put an awful taste in my mouth). Wonderful performances, no doubt, which did seem to get stronger as the film progressed; if nothing else, the man knows how to handle his actors.
When I saw the trailer for this, I couldn't help but think, do we really need another one of these sick-soul-of-suburbia movies, Alan Ball or no Alan Ball? (I would have thought Little Children had run the genre down to the ground, especially with that awfully condescending title and smug Will Lyman voiceover.) But then I picked up Richard Yates's book recently and was startled by his deep, dark vision of human nature and acute psychological insight (although the John Givings character, imo, does toe the line somewhat between conceit and flesh-and-blood). If Sam Mendes can mostly stay out of his own way---if, in other words, he can wipe that "smirk" off his style, so to speak---I figured, after reading the book, that this movie adaptation could possibly be almost as devastating. So thanks Dan; this review gives me hope that it'll live up to my guardedly optimistic expectations, and I am definitely looking forward to seeing this.
There's a lot more involved in the greatness of The Heiress and Carrie than simply "getting out of the way." Wyler had hits and misses, just like the more "visionary" Godard and Lynch, but he was at the top of his profession--truly great--when he directed those films.
Haven't seen those aforementioned Wyler films yet, but in my experience he tends to get *into* the way a lot of the time. Cf. The Good Fairy (which is too slow) and Dodsworth (which seems inexplicably frantic). Not that that has anything to do with it.
As far as Wyler goes, I have admiration and respect for some of his work. "Dodsworth," "The Heiress" and "Carrie" are all outstanding. But he's a classic, and perplexing, case of someone who does not leave any personal stamp on his films.
I've looked at all of them for years; I had to write a piece for a Film Forum retrospective. And he's the invisible man: he's there to interpret, like a theater director. Whatever visual distinction his films have come from the cinematographers (Rudolph Mate, Gregg Toland). His "do it again" style of direction of actors worked wonders for most performers (just how that worked, though, remains a bit mysterious to me).
In closing, please don't think I'm saying that Sam Mendes is or ever will be anywhere near Wyler's level. But he's a theater director, and he served this Yates material, and the material happens to be great. That's enough for me.
I think Mendes was a total liability on this one and he wrecks the film. He made another feel-bad suburbia cliche.
With this material, they needed a great director who knows how to work with actors. Leonardo D. was lost in his scenes -- it got tiresome seeing him and Kate W. repetitively screaming at each other like they were in a scene study class.
I couldn't help but think of, say, ONE FOR THE ROAD, which handled this sort of meltdown with real feeling and complexity.
Kate Winslet manages to get through it better than Leo, but the supporting cast of fine actors (Dylan Baker, Michael Shannon, Kathy Bates) seem somehow straight-jacketed. Whenever possible, Mendes falls back on cliche.
Ugh...
As always, I really enjoyed your take on the film and it may inspire me to give it another look, but man -- R.R. left me feeling like I'd eaten a lousy meal at an overpriced restaurant.
Dan, do you really find Yates lacking humor? There seemed to me to be a lot of pitch-black comedy in the novel, from Frank thinking himself a "Sartre" kind of guy, to Mr. and Mrs. Givings' domestic scenes (though I didn't want more of them in the film; I didn't like Kathy Bates' performance as much as you did).
So you're saying that a suburbia sucks movie, one directed by the guy who made American Beauty no less, is good? Is that even possible?
Dan - Thanks for this. It's just what I wanted to know about how the book and the movie mesh. It's hard to read a book like this and not be haunted by it. Almost have a NEED to see April in the flesh and spend more time with her. That being said, I look forward to your comparison of Cormac McCarthy's The Road and the film version with Viggo Mortenson, due to come out next year. Similarly, I long for more time with the man and the boy and their traumatic, beautiful travels.
I also wouldn't say that Yates is lacking in humor. His novels are essentially comedies--only in the darkest, pitch-black of night sense. There are no "good" characters in his novels. They all have devastating flaws they are simply blind to, and the joke of the novels is ultimately on them.
I groaned the first time I heard Sam Mendes was making a film of Revolutionary Road, knowing that without Yates careful tone, there was a terrible movie to be made out of the basic plot of the novel. From your review and others, I can be fairly certain that my fears will be proven.
Post a Comment