Tuesday, September 09, 2008

Definition of a Cult Classic: The Fall

By Will Lasky

[The Fall streets today on DVD and Blu-Ray.]

Watching Tarsem Singh's The Fall made me hate Guillermo Del Toro all the more for consistently locking me within plot-driven, petty geek-boxes of marketable fantasy.

In contradistinction, Tarsem documents a visual universe that seems flung together and bereft of the structural, tonal gravitas and authorial control that Oscar loves. Even though no CGI was used during the film's production, the Dali-like dreamscapes Tarsem gathered from the natural world appear hyper-real and, consequently, post-produced and phony. (Corporate gloss, per the suggestion of New York Times film critic Nathan Lee.) Perhaps we have become so used to digital facsimile that the real world seems like just another Sprint commercial. Or is it more a question of puritanically lumping art and pop into separate categories: art must remain sanctified and dull while pop is now an occasion where good taste is gently set aside in favor of cathartic animal release. There is something transgressive about The Fall, about how it blurs the categories of pop and art. It is an innovation with something important to say about what film-making can be when unshackled from the standardized gradients that drive and determine mainstream success.

Tarsem's transgressive visual statement revolves around two layers of fiction. A convalescent, lovesick, suicidal stuntman, Roy Walker (Lee Pace), fabricates a story for an adorable little Romanian girl, Alexandra (Catinca Untaru). A hodgepodge of characters emerge from Roy's imagination and their interactions are driven by Alexandra's fascination as an audience. Among others, there is the Black Bandit (Roy's fictional counterpart, also played by Pace), an escaped African slave, an Italian demolition expert (redolent of A Fistful of Dynamite), and none other than Charles Darwin himself, clad in a peacock jacket and bowler hat. They are all out for revenge against Baron Odious. The Baron has, among other foul deeds, stolen the Black Bandit's girlfriend, a Caucasian geisha-siren bridging the divide between the real and the fictive.

The crux of the fairytale within the tale is its colorful, improvised nature as opposed to a conventional veneer of narrative seamlessness and authorial control. It equally lacks the dramatic, tonal gloom we see lauded again and again in movies, relying instead on bright colors (greens, reds, and blues) that leap out of desert landscapes. Nor is there a Danny Elfman score maniacally propelling us through worlds of wonder.

Roy's tale is arbitrarily constructed and unfurled both for the audience (Alexandra), for the storyteller, and probably for Tarsem himself who relied on Untaru's adorable, lost-in-translation diction and imagination as a guide to the story within the story. In fact, it is Roy who is the primary recipient of his own story's cathartic effects. Consequently, The Fall emerges as something unplanned and unbound, with transformational powers stemming from the warp-bubble it creates in which art affects reality. Certainly we have seen such a mechanism before, and it can translate into glaring pretentiousness. Yet it can also produce works in the modern tradition of Fellini or Borges: art about storytelling, about the artist's own joyful gusto or automatic need to create.

Tarsem's lust for natural imagery seems less the progeny of American cinema, where a tightly woven, character-driven plot has always been king, and more an heir to a lower-budget continental tradition. Perhaps I feel this way because I just haven't seen a beautiful, image-driven American film in the theaters for so long. Experiencing The Fall, therefore, reminded me of my full-body baptism in Soviet-era cinema where intact attention spans allowed for the creation of dirge-like panegyrics to the beauty of cityscapes, villages, rundown Krushchev-era apartment blocks and to the geography of the faces inhabiting these varied microcosms. There is room within natural imagery for audiences to cast their own psyches onto the artist's canvas, to harvest an intimate experience, something that simply doesn't exist when we are the victims of some novelty narrative relentlessly building toward a stunning finale. The Fall possesses this breathing room, creating reflexivity in which one not only experiences flashing lights and sounds, but where one is also acutely aware of the experience itself as something both viscerally and intellectually enjoyed.

Yet unlike the visual cinema of Eastern Europe, Tarsem's film is accelerated in the manner of the contemporary music video. Action is constant and shifting, whether we are witnessing swimming elephants or the embedded rituals of a Cambodian tribe. Meanwhile, the fairytale is burnished by bold-faced self-sarcasm and playfulness reminiscent of other Spike Jonze co-productions: "That's a great idea, Charles Darwin!" the Black Bandit exclaims. Darwin himself receives all of his ideas from the monkey he carries around with him in a sack. Ultimately, Baron Odious's destruction is like Blanche DuBois's ideal death by contaminated grape—light and stylized, sun-kissed, rebuking the self-delighted macabre popularized by Tarantino and the Coens, yet also existing within that very same violent Hollywood neighborhood.

There are abundant humorous nuances here that defy the film's critical characterization as mere corporate gloss. Yet how does such an interpretation emerge? Perhaps the answer lies in the film's anomalous nature. It is an image-driven artwork, yet it doesn't behave in the way we expect an art film to behave. Consequently, it somewhat tragically exists apart, a film without a category, possessing neither the born-of-slowness mystery of a Kieslowski creation, nor the blistering authorial control of the Coens, nor Terry Gilliam's delightful, homemade props. The resulting experience is unique and thrilling. We are never implicitly told how to feel, when to applaud, or what moments to relish. Consequently, The Fall takes its place among an elite category of cinema: a careful artwork that doesn't advertise its own gravitas. Perhaps that's the definition of a cult classic.
_______________________________________________
Will Lasky is a freelance journalist who writes on culture, travel, and business. He blogs at Mike Tyson Vodka and has contributed to 24LiesaSecond.

14 comments:

the hanged man said...

Hear, hear. I went to see The Fall with low expectations, thinking it would just be another empty eye-candy experience and left thinking that it was the movie that "Pan's Labyrinth" should have been. I hope its ravishing power is not diminished on dvd.

jasmine said...

Certainly a cult classic - I felt an instant kinship with the few people I know who'd seen & loved it.

Robert said...

Sorry for not adding anything to the discussion, but I really really want to see this.

Thinking about blind buying the DVD. Any thoughts?

M. said...

Like Jasmine, I immediately feel warmer toward people who love this film (to my dismay, two of my favorite movie-watching friends found it unimpressive). Not one negative review has convinced me to see it the way the writer did — this positive commentary, though, I love for landing on all the things that it takes me a while to latch on to. For me, first, the film's centerpiece is the strange, almost illogical friendship between Roy and Alexandra, and the effect it comes to have on him; I love her as a tiny heroine, both fictional and real.

And I also love that it's surprisingly funny; no single line this year has continued to make me laugh like the unexpected delivery of "Though I've dedicated myself to god and goodness, secretly I enjoy throwing oranges at the priest."

Jeff McMahon said...

I'm a little startled, I found this movie to be pretty hollow - where some see defiance of standard Hollywood narrative formula, I see a simple lack of competence in conforming to them, not for lack of trying.

Will Lasky said...

I think that's really the remarkable thing about certain cultural productions. The Fall seems to galvanize and appeal to a certain community of people, while other perfectly discerning individuals just think it's crap. I feel an equivalent sense of disbelief and distaste for No Country for Old Men.

Steven Boone said...

I had no curiosity about seeing this flick until I read this review.

The crisis of 21st Century American cinema(!): "Tarsem's lust for natural imagery seems less the progeny of American cinema, where a tightly woven, character-driven plot has always been king, and more an heir to a lower-budget continental tradition. Perhaps I feel this way because I just haven't seen a beautiful, image-driven American film in the theaters for so long. Experiencing The Fall, therefore, reminded me of my full-body baptism in Soviet-era cinema where intact attention spans allowed for the creation of dirge-like panegyrics to the beauty of cityscapes, villages, rundown Krushchev-era apartment blocks and to the geography of the faces inhabiting these varied microcosms. There is room within natural imagery for audiences to cast their own psyches onto the artist's canvas, to harvest an intimate experience, something that simply doesn't exist when we are the victims of some novelty narrative relentlessly building toward a stunning finale."

All the prevized, CGI'ed, D.I.'ed blender-edited contemporary films don't know nothing about that there. But I disagree that characters drive American films. The characters are dragged around at gunpoint and forced to recite from a list of demands (formerly the screenplay).

What's interesting is that the trailers for The Fall are cut and mixed to make it appear no different from the flicks you say it diverges so sharply from. Standard marketing procedure, but still maddening.

I think NCFOM was way overpraised, but I did appreciate that it attempted to use spaces, silences and real-time rhythms to tell its same-ol' story. I felt the same way about the ludicrous but relatively patient visual flow of I Am Legend.

Adam said...

If you're gonna compare Del Toro's work to The Fall - I was just thinking, before reading this, about The Fall in comparison to Pan's Labyrinth, and I think the reason that I think Pan's Labyrinth is a better movie is we care about what happens in the 'fantasy' world just as much as the 'real' world. In 'The Fall,' the story-within-the-story never takes on a life of its own. To do so perhaps, you could argue, would be to remove the element of storytelling and the unreliable narrator but I think these could be included. The story he weaves is amusing and certainly the visuals are beautiful and quite unique, but at no point did I actually care what happened to those guys in that story. Good movie though, and the little girl was very good.

Actionman said...

The Fall is EASILY the single best film I have seen this year. I haven't been able to get it out of my mind since I saw it last May. I cannot wait to re-visit it on DVD. It's a masterpiece, a true work of art, and I don't trust anyone who claims to be a lover of film if they say they didn't love this one-of-a-kind accomplishment.

Jeff McMahon said...

I am a lover of film and I didn't love this accomplishment, which is very much like several movies I have seen before.

Best example: everything this movie does, Gilliam's Tideland does better.

Will Lasky said...

In fairness to del Toro, I actually kind of liked Pan's Labyrinth. I really enjoyed seeing a movie about Fascist Spain, an oft neglected period of history. For me personally, I cared so much about the characters in the Fall that I wept. I was incredibly moved by this film, what it had to say about fantasy, about the capability of an imagination unhindered by conventions, and about how we all live in this ravaging, beautiful world. But primarily, I found the relationship between Roy and the little girl incredibly real and beautiful. Pan's Labyrinth, in my memory lingers as a sense of atmosphere. Like in a Christopher Nolan production. I just can hardly remember what it was all about.

prowler said...

i loved pan's labyrinth and tideland, and compared to them, the fall is like a toy movie. a shiny toy, but still kids stuff.

the roy character is extremely simple and one-dimensional, his unhappiness being mirrored in the story he's imagining, which alexandria's mind filters into cinematic eye candy

it's impossible to care for the 5 "heroes" when you know they're the product of roy's simple and flat character.

Anonymous said...

I see Roy's 5 characters as all parts of Roy and, of course, as imagined by the little girl, are rich and all hold various degrees of importance for her in ways that her child-self can grasp and use in her own story of grief.
No one mentioned the amazing and short stop-action animation of her dream after the fall that knocked her out. The gabble-chattering, caped stick-figure-ish doctors cutting open her skull and unreeling her paper note from her head. Now, that was a dream!

Anonymous said...

I saw trailers for this film, and was going to go see it, but then it fell off my radar and I never went. After reading this review though I'd like to give it a shot. The trailers really blew me away with the intensity of the colors and imagery.