1. "SnagFilms launched today": The indieWIRE buyer goes live. Link above is a summary report by Spout's Paul Moore. The site itself is here.
["At SnagFilms.com, you can watch full-length documentary films for free, but we also make it easy for you to take our films with you and put them anywhere on the web. When you embed a widget on your web site, you open a virtual movie theater and become a “Filmanthropist.” Donate your pixels and support independent film! And click on “info” on any widget to learn more about that film and a related charity you can also support.
With a library of 225 documentaries, and rapidly growing — browse by topic or go through the alphabet from A-Z — you’re bound to find films that resonate with your interests. There is a widget for EVERY film, so any film you like can be snagged. To learn more about snagging go here. Enjoy your visit, snag a film, and keep checking back because we’re adding great news titles daily. "]
2. "Devil May Care by Sebastian Faulks as Ian Fleming": Jeffrey Hill Q's up with the new Bond novel.
["Faulks wrote Devil May Care as a facsimile of Fleming's work, designed to fit in Zelig-like as the thirteenth Bond novel. It fits imperfectly, of course. Faulks described his approach as recreating the good things in the series and discarding the bad things. He also noted that Ian Fleming had left Bond in pretty bad mental and physical shape by The Man With the Golden Gun – not just as a result of Bond’s traumatic adventures, but also as a result of Fleming’s own failing health. Faulks takes the initiative to bring Bond back from Fleming’s despair more to give himself breathing room than anything else, and he puts Bond back in his prime. It’s okay that in the transition Faulks forgoes some of the character depth that Fleming had achieved because the imitation has an authenticity about it. Faulks understands and practices expertly the "Fleming sweep", which, I think, saves him from the pitfalls that come with taking all the good stuff and leaving out all the bad. Granted, the plot in Devil May Care is more complicated than it is clever or ingenuous and several of Faulk’s throwbacks to previous sequences are over-the-top, but otherwise it is paced like a Bond novel and has a similar humor about it that makes everything else seem like it could conceivably come from Fleming’s pen."]
3. A perfect pair on Mamma Mia!. Our own N.P. Thompson and John Simon.
["The first half-hour of Mamma Mia! is so dreadful it suggests an elephantine equivalent of a stoner comedy. The jokes aren’t funny, or even recognizable as jokes (Baranski lifting a towel from a basket and reacting in horror at the open-mouthed fish inside it, or Baranski stumbling about the pier in her white high heels—slapstick isn’t her métier; the hideous, low-cut, sleeveless, tropical watercolor frocks Ann Roth designed for her are similarly unsuitable), and the first two musical numbers range from flat (“Honey, Honey”) to enervated (“Money, Money, Money”). The “Money” production, in which Streep, who lives in a gorgeous setting on a rustic island off the coast of Greece, seems particularly redolent of a marijuana-induced haze. Why would someone who lives in a kind of paradise have glowing fantasies about riding around on a yacht? Surely, she has water access enough as is. Streep’s Donna, quaintly clad in straw hat and blue overalls, isn’t exactly suffering out there, running her inn, with dozens of dancing servants to manage the work for her. It takes a certain level of poshlost to devise a story to wrap around songs that are already (most of them) well established, as opposed to writing songs that grow organically out of a story. What Mamma Mia! must have represented on stage, and definitely represents on screen, is the laziest wish fulfillment bad taste imaginable, a sort of grand-scale paint by numbers kit. Whether it was actually sprung from such a source or not, the very premise of structuring a musical this way implies a sensibility shaped by the contours of divorce courts, Harlequin romance novels, and airport lounges."]
4. "Two Million Acres, Baby!": The latest installment of "Best Pictures from the Outside In" at The Film Experience. Under discussion: Cimarron and Million Dollar Baby.
["Speaking of final acts that play like funerals, I love M$B more every time I watch it. I think it's a pretty great movie about poverty and desperation, without being overt or didactic about these things -- except in the grating, discordant treatment of Maggie's intolerable family. Certainly a case where it might have behooved Clint to try a little rehearsal, or at least do more than his celebrated one or two takes. But otherwise, the tact and expressive precision of the movie are wondrous to me. That inky cinematography is all the movie often needs to telegraph sadness, limitation, aloneness. (And to signal, too, how much we're not seeing: for example, what DID Frankie do to his daughter? Yikes…)"]
5. "Maine woman finds 8-foot snake in her washer": From MSNBC.
["Burton reached into the machine wearing a pair of welding gloves, expecting to come out with a 4-foot snake. But when he pulled the animal out, it kept coming and coming — all 8 feet of it. Once out of the machine, the angry snake wrapped itself around Burton's hand, cutting off the blood flow. Burton then wrestled the scaly reptile into a plastic bag, tied it shut and brought it to Lewiston."]
Quote of the Day: Cullen Hightower
Image of the Day (click to enlarge): The Siren goes to the Creek.
Clip of the Day: So there's this little movie called Watchmen... ("visionary director of 300," huh?).
_____________________________________________________
"Links for the Day": Each morning, the House editors post a series of weblinks that we think will spark discussion. Comments encouraged. Suggestions for links are also welcome. Please send to keithuhlich@gmail.com.
Friday, July 18, 2008
Links for the Day (July 18th, 2008)
Labels:
Links for the Day
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
18 comments:
i can already see the commentary tracks on the dvd:
"DO YOU SEE THAT BLUE? THAT BLUE COST $300 MILLION. IT TOOK US EIGHT DAYS AND 200 ANIMATORS TO MAKE HIM THAT FUCKING BLUE."
"HERE WAS MY THOUGHT PROCESS BEHIND THE SLOW-MOTION FIGHT: SHIT WAS AWESOME IN 300, YO."
"LOOK. THEIR SUITS ARE MADE OUT OF A COMBIANTION OF HUMAN SKIN, RUBBER AND DEAD CHILDREN."
"LOOK AT THE TITS ON THAT ONE."
"HOLY SHIT, DID YOU SEE THAT GUY EXPLODE? THAT WAS REAL. WE BROUGHT A NUCLEAR REACTOR ON SET AND THEN DIGITALLY ERASED IT, RE-ENTERED BILLY CRUDUP, AND BLEW THAT GUY APART. LITERALLY. WE ENGULFED HIM IN RADIATION. HE IS DEAD. WE DEDICATE THIS FILM TO HIS FAMILY."
The trailer: It's amazing how something can be so similar to its source material and yet completely fail on every level to capture what was powerful about that source.
I love that fucking trailer. I am currently sitting in a tree with that trailer, k.i.s.s.i.n.g the fuck out of it. I also love Lichman's comments re: the dedication. I am the worst type of filmgoer - sold on tawdry promises of breasts, big burly blue men, and explosions. Wait for the film to receive even a hint of a buzz come next year, and I will do a volte-face as quickly as you can say Geschwindigkeitsueberschreitung.
And talking about blue men, I saw Captain Mannequin and the first thing I said to myself was Tobias Funke. I like speaking to myself.
That slow motion, then fast, then slow, then fast etc. style of action directing made "300" torture to sit through (as well as the endless narration and Gerard Butler screaming every other line).
Talk about a style that drains excitement from an action scene. It's funny that we live in an age of action movies made by directors who can't direct action.
Is it me or does the "Watchmen" trailer look like "The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen"?
Zack Snyder is a visionary, if by "visionary" you mean somebody who envisions other people's visions, but in slow motion. If Watchmen is any good it's going to be based on the strength of the material overcoming his murky, obvious "graphic novel" aesthetic.
And as better men than I have already stated, at what point did Moore and Gibbons succeed a PULITZER WINNER in the "most acclaimed" category?
Random thoughts while watching the trailer for the first time:
* Hey, I never did see that DOTD remake...I wonder if all the zombies are not only fast, but fast in slow motion.
* Well played, Snyder. All these years I've envisioned a WATCHMEN movie, it always somehow involved a chick in a leather fetish outfit sashaying through a burning building at some point.
* And here I was thinking V FOR VENDETTA was the closest an Alan Moore adaptation would ever come to resembling one of the MATRIX sequels.
* Ozymandias must have gotten a lot of money from his relatives to be able to afford that spiffy costume so soon after his high school graduation.
* This is reminding me waaay too much of the trailer for THE SPIRIT.
* Wasn't this Smashing Pumpkins song also in BATMAN & ROBIN? Of all the superhero movies ever made, is that really the one you want to closely associate yours with?
* I should have known. After all the money 300 made, I really should have known.
* "Never compromise"...(sigh)
Re: michael peterson's last comment, someone with a lot more free time and resources than me really needs to create a Zack Snyder MAUS trailer. Preferably with Linkin Park playing over it.
Although I didn't care for 300, I did enjoy Snyder's previous film, the Dawn of the Dead remake. So I'm not quite ready to write him off.
Re #1: I might have a reading comprehension problem or something, but I am not entirely sure how the SnagFilms arrangement ultimately translates into money for the creators of the content being "snagged." As near as I can tell -- via the Wall Street Journal article about the deal -- the filmmakers and SnagFilms will share revenue from the ads embedded in the widgets, and there will be links to buy DVDs of the film -- though I have to wonder, if the entire film can be viewed online, and if visual quality isn't as essential to documentaries as it's perceived to be with dramatic features, why would somebody buy the DVD of the movie they just watched online, especially if it's available to watch again for free online whenever the viewer desires?
I'm not poo-poohing the whole concept, mind you, just wondering about the details of this arrangement.
The WSJ story I mentioned is here, if anybody's interested.
-Speaking for myself, Matt, upon hearing of Snag I became very excited at the opportunity to view a number of these docs online - and when I enjoy something I read/view online, I will purchase the "hard copy" out of support alone, if not for an optimal experience (I'm a huge proponent of enjoying media online, but there's no denying my TV & futon make for a more comfortable movie).
-"Futurefree"... if I only had a camera.
-Also "Futurefree" - in the interests of keeping things clean and fair, the original text DID have a woman in kinkwear in a burning building.
I don't recall the kinkwear being quite so...uh...blatant, though, nor the presentation being quite so "check-ME-out." I mean, that is Silk Spectre, right? Interesting that Nite Owl, Rorschach, and Dr. Manhattan seem like such slavish recreations costume-wise, whereas SS seems to have somehow lost a layer or 2 of outerwear. Snyder certainly knows his fanboys: they may want to see doggedly faithful adherence to the source material, but there are certain things they'll always want to see more.
Thought number one: Holy shit, someone found a way to make Malin Akerman attractive!
Thought number two: Man, Zack Snyder would have been PERFECT for Transformers. Unfortunately...
-Yeah, Silk Spectre wore, essentially, saran wrap. And part of the whole play on Nite Owl's impotence was that it was seeing her in the fetishwear - a visible symbol for his needing that identity.
-I'm inclined to disagree. If Transformers has to be a "live action" film, I'd like to see someone who understands the thematic potential of beings bred specifically for war that long for peace, and battle over ostensibly religious reasons when their motives are blatantly for energy resources.
I'm curious about the Watchmen movie...how can they be faithful to the source material without making the movie boring?
It seems like an impossible task, since the comic itself intentionally sets out to bore the reader...I don't see how it can possibly be turned into a movie.
Michael: you're probably right. I just wonder what someone who has a real visual sense would have done with the material. And a Simon Furman plot.
Post a Comment