Monday, July 21, 2008

Generation Kill Mondays: Episode 2, "The Cradle of Civilization"—Take 2

By Jeremiah Kipp

The first combat episode of Generation Kill is analogous to lousy sex. Perhaps viewers need their expectations similarly deflated when it comes to war movies because we’ve come to expect a certain amount of firefighting and explosions like so many bells and whistles. And while I think the denial of those things is a mixture of straight-up “this is how it happened” reportage straight from Evan Wright’s non-fiction book and a dramatic conceit that subverts expectations, it does make me wonder if watching war movies, no matter what the circumstance, is an act of spectatorship. We either want to see cities get blown up with Wagnerian gusto or get that adrenaline rush of excitement as the bullets go whizzing by our heroes, or we want a deadening ennui knowing that war is hell and absurd. Regardless, there’s a kind of programmed response to war pictures no matter what the format, and Generation Kill is no exception. Does self-awareness of this make for better television? I’m still not sure.

However, that feeling of not getting jerked off real nice does manage to, ironically, keep you on the edge of your seat. “How long are these guys going to prolong the inevitable?” you think. “This show is called Generation Kill. Eventually, this generation of marines is going to have to kill.” It’s not unlike that distinct feeling I had when I saw the stage version of Edward Albee’s The Goat. The husband comes home, the wife is waiting for him, she thinks he is having an affair, and the title of the play is The Goat. Albee had us sit there in that heightened state of self-awareness for a good half-hour, maybe forty-five minutes, watching the husband and wife talk their way around what we already assumed from the title.

The Marines of the First Reconnaissance Battalion are so bored and disgruntled from not shooting at the enemy that they resort to making a special point of discussing when and where they have to take a dump, or snickering acknowledgement of homo-eroticism in the military. As their armored humvees pass by dead bodies on the desert roadside, there’s a sense of wonderment about when they’ll actually be able to shoot at the enemy. In this second episode, we spend so much time stuck in the vehicle with our four protagonists that, even though we learn very little about their personal lives, the fact that we’re spending an exhaustive amount of time with them creates a certain amount of identification. Maybe it can’t be helped. Audiences want to connect, and they’ll grab at straws if they have to.

By osmosis, we get a sense of these characters as being slightly more than young men with crew cuts. For example, Cpl. Josh Ray Person (James Ransone, who played Ziggy in the second season of The Wire), is a chatterbox rambling on and on about the ridiculousness of army protocol, his lack of sleep, and his experience on the high school debate team (and how they all thought he was high all the time because he would never shut his yap). He neatly breaks down why he and his colleagues are dissatisfied. He is looking for pussy and finds none, his pal Cpl. Trombley (Billy Lush) wants to shoot the enemy but does not have the opportunity, and Sgt. Colbert (Alexander Skarsgård) no doubt joined up because he saw the recruiting commercial where the knight kills a dragon (“Dress blues with a sword!”). We don’t get the sense that we can truly know these men, any more than most people know the acquaintances they work with at the office, since all the chit-chat in the humvee amounts to the same thing as struggling to kill time by the water cooler as an effort to get through another mundane day.

Much of the episode is spent in anticipation of combat and, as if to tease us, it is parceled out in little increments. Tension is created more through placing the humvee in vulnerable spots on rickety bridges and narrow inner-city streets lined with debris. Violence is seen at a distance, and when a sniper takes out two of the enemy, it’s seen in an ultra-wide shot. When the kill happens, it’s like seeing a pinpoint figure explode in crimson. I wonder how this level of detachment affects the viewer. Does this whet our appetite for more killing or have us go inside our heads and intellectualize the experience of disaffectedness?

The soldiers are so bored that one of them, a commanding officer who took an enemy AK-47 as contraband, opens fire on an unarmed Iraqi and takes him out. Generation Kill doesn’t linger on this, allowing the moment to speak for itself. When the marines ask about it (“Did you just see that? I think he was unarmed!”) it’s tossed away like a fast food wrapper. “I didn’t see what the commander saw,” says another marine, shrugging it away as best he can. The scene is an effective one, and yet I’m as ambivalent about it as I am everything else in Generation Kill. The actors in the scene really seem to sink their teeth into this fleeting moment, perhaps because they are so constricted much of the time by playing characters who do their jobs, commit to activities, and reveal character through the doing of things rather than emotive feeling.

There’s little doubt that the battalion is heading towards a firefight as they pass through an enemy occupied town. The marines hunger to “set the tempo” in their skirmishes, and Generation Kill treats its big battle scene like a gigantic musical number where the peaks and crescendos are handled with bullets and grenades. There’s no source music in any of the episodes thus far, but the sound design dictates how excited we should feel. The cameras lurch and try to catch images on the fly, so a quick pan to a doorway will surely reveal an enemy soldier, and a tilt-up will catch a marine freaking out. Since we’ve been waiting for this the entire show, Generation Kill makes good on expectations. It doesn’t cover any ground we haven’t already seen in Saving Private Ryan or Black Hawk Down, but it does make us wait for it a prolonged spell of time, and tricks us into thinking we somehow earned it.
______________________________________________
Jeremiah Kipp's writing has appeared in Slant Magazine, Filmmaker, Fangoria and other publications.

6 comments:

Connor Morris said...

Hate it, but I have to wonder how much of the indifference the soldiers take towards the shooting of an unarmed civilian is straight-up Simon. I would never say that type of thing doesn't happen, but after The Wire, it's almost predictable. Loved the second episode, but I'm worried reading into the show's thematic elements is going to become redundant after five seasons of that other show.

Jeremiah Kipp said...

Hey Connor -- that's a concern of mine as well. But I found that with THE WIRE, if I stuck with it, the payoff would be significant and powerful. I'm sticking with GENERATION KILL for the same reason.

Anonymous said...

It seemed fairly apparant that the soldiers were fairly alarmed, taken aback and displeased with the shooting of the unarmed civilian but understood as it was their superior, who they routinely mock behind his back, that did the shooting there was nothing they could do (a theme not unfamiliar to Simon and Burns). The line "I didn't see what the commander saw" clearly expresses the dismay of the soldier and the unfortunate realities of authority that he cannot question what occured.

It seems like Mr. Kipp here is looking for a different show.

"It doesn’t cover any ground we haven’t already seen in Saving Private Ryan or Black Hawk Down, but it does make us wait for it a prolonged spell of time, and tricks us into thinking we somehow earned it."

I would argue GK is doing something entirely different and at odds with the histrionics and grand lessons those films attempted to impart. If it does not measure up to the idea of what a war movie is that those films present, well, all the better.

skdpnyc said...

there was interesting moment when the soldiers passed some of the bodies along the way. One of them was filming, then was told to stop because the scene was too gruesome.

There is a theme about how Marines don't have adequate supplies, they just "make do" where all the other military gets better treatment. This has come up a few times about batteries. Some of the troops seem to be wasting them on running video and still cameras. it's a stretch, but the interplay of being engaged (fighting/killing) and being an active spectator (recording/selling footage to CNN) seemed prevalent. I haven't read the book, so don't know how big of deal this is, but definitely seemed to represent a dynamic of modern warfare...

Jeremiah Kipp said...

--- the interplay of being engaged (fighting/killing) and being an active spectator (recording/selling footage to CNN) seemed prevalent. I haven't read the book, so don't know how big of deal this is, but definitely seemed to represent a dynamic of modern warfare... ---

That's an interesting point. GENERATION KILL does seem to be aware of those sorts of fine ironies. I do find it a little chilling no one can do anything anymore without having a camera to capture the moment. It bugs me a little to think we are living lives through the lens, and probably our nostalgia for the event will be nostalgia for the moment we took the picture.

J-rod said...

I don't know why Simon took this project but I wouldn't be surprised if his love affair with dysfunctional systems and inverted power relationships wasn't at root. The dysfunction of war in and of itself is obvious enough without the post-Iraq War debacle to add tension to this series.

In the military, the competence of the strategic commanders aside, there is plenty of idiotic power mongering and disconnected decision making. The boots on the ground and fingers on the trigger are the most powerful actors in the military, yet they are excluded from the decision making. Their hands are tied by the hierarchy. As much as chain of command was explored in The Wire, its even more obvious here.

We've seen several examples of the middle command being total retards (Captain America and the Staff Sergeant(?) enforcing the grooming standard). These two characters left a strong memory from my reading of the book as well. The men below them have to deal with the annoyance and incompetence as best they can, thus the line about "We didn't see what the captain saw." Everyone knows its bullshit and no one is giving the captain the benefit of the doubt, but the men have to find a way to deal with it, to put it past them. Anything else become unbearable.

We see similar instances with the untucked blouse in Episode one and Fick staying Iceman's hand when the Iceman gets blamed for the wrong turn. You just have to put up with it, and that's all there is to it.

For those who don't know, Fick wrote a book as well, "One Bullet Away: the making of a marine officer" (I might be amiss on the subtitle). Good read, with coverage of Fick's deployment in Afghanistan, his OTS, and then Iraq. He has since left the military and joined Center for A New American Security, cnas.org.