Monday, October 29, 2007

Torchwood, Season One, Ep. 8: "They Keep Killing Suzie"

By Joan O’Connell Hedman

"They Keep Killing Suzie" is the kind of episode that Torchwood does well: an exploration of the human character, unfolding in unexpected ways in a unique context. It could be seen as a return to form, if Torchwood had established one yet. There are no aliens in this week's episode, but that doesn't mean that there aren't any monsters; whether they are monsters by nature or nurture is the question of the day.

When the team arrives to investigate a series of gruesome murders, they're met by a Detective Swanson (Yasmin Bannerman) with a chip on her shoulder so big it's spoiling her attractive features. She and her staff have no patience for Torchwood with their "special ops" mystique, and from her attitude we glean that Torchwood isn't as secret an organization as we've been led to believe. This may be another manifestation of a poorly managed first season, but a good bit of the character interactions hang on this point; if Swanson's entire staff is aware enough of Torchwood to detest them, our team has been doing a poor job of keeping a low profile.

The murder scene reveals why Swanson & company are particularly peeved with Torchwood. It's called out by name, with foot-high letters spelling "TORCHWOOD" rendered in the victims' blood. The team reacts with a mixture of dismay and nonchalance, with some banter about how many people they've managed to piss off; at that, Swanson goes completely off the rails. She launches into a "It was only a matter of time" harangue, detailing how they swan around with such high-handed arrogance, and ends up with "As far as I'm concerned, you did it."

You don't often see that level of hyperbole and blame-shifting in police professionals, because usually they know it's bilge, and that psychos will use whatever excuse is most convenient to justify their behaviors. Still, the entire team wonders if the detective isn't right when, via DNA evidence left at the murder site, analysis reveals that the murderer had an unknown compound, "B67" in his blood. Owen (Burn Gorman) identifies it immediately as RetCon, the amnesia drug that Torchwood uses to keep its secrets secret, a system obviously in need of overhaul. When Ianto (Gareth David-Lloyd) declares that 2,008 people have been dosed with RetCon, they have the decency to pause for a moment to contemplate just how horrible things could get if the drug causes violent psychosis.

Gwen (Eve Myles), a RetCon survivor herself, pushes hard for aggressive action. We're back to the Gwen of strong convictions so markedly absent in "Greeks Bearing Gifts"; she convinces Jack (John Barrowman) that what's happening here is serious enough to get the Resurrection Gauntlet, aka the Glove, out of cold storage so they can question the victims.

Jack tries the Glove, but fails. Owen won't even have a go, having tried it before with no success. Ianto also declines, and Tosh is off monitoring equipment. Gwen insists that she make the attempt, in spite of Jack's concern (wordlessly mirrored by Owen); they can't help but remember what happened to Suzie the last time someone was allowed to use the Glove. Gwen insists; Jack relents, and gives her the Glove with some words of advice. Pushing Daisies this isn't. The first victim, Alex Arwen (Daniel Llewelyn-Williams) is no help at all, and Gwen's inexperience with the Glove gives them only about half a minute. The next victim (a brief but terrific performance by Gary Pillai) is a bit more helpful, giving them three important names: Pilgrim, Max, and inevitably, Suzie, Jack's former second-in-command who committed suicide in "Everything Changes" (after Gwen discovered she was murdering people so she could develop her skills with the Glove).

A search of the victim's home turns up a hand-written flyer for Pilgrim, a religious support group. Suzie's former co-workers dismiss the idea that Suzie could ever have belonged to such a group, but Gwen asks them pointedly how they could know such a thing. Until Gwen showed up, none of them ever showed any interest in one another, and they acknowledge that they never really knew Suzie at all. They take a field trip to a storage locker to go through her things, and Gwen learns that when she dies, all of her things will be similarly preserved, as will her body in Torchwood's morgue. She has never considered these things before, and now it's way too late to get out.

When Tosh (Naoko Mori) discovers a Pilgrim flyer among Suzie's things, that decides it for Jack: it's time to talk to Suzie (Indira Varma). Resurrecting her successfully involves some business with the knife she had created (Ianto, tasked with coming up with cool names for things, dubs it the "Life Knife"), and Jack sort-of has to kill her again by stabbing her in the heart before Gwen can resurrect her.

Typically, a resurrected victim would only survive for a minute or two, but Suzie's a different case altogether; she not only doesn't die, it seems she can't die. Once Suzie is alive again, the episode becomes a study of three characters, principally Suzie, in contrast to Gwen, with a decent supporting performance from Jack.

In "Everything Changes," we all (Team Torchwood included) assumed that Suzie was seduced and corrupted by the power of the Glove, that it was the desire to master the Glove for good that led her to murder. Turns out that Suzie was brilliant but psychotic; the resurrected Suzie does little but whine and complain. The team is still operating on the principal that Suzie was a decent person that derailed at the end of her life, but that's a very bad assumption.

Gwen, sucked in by Suzie's request to see her dying father, takes her off on an unauthorized field trip just as Owen discovers that Suzie has created a link, via the Glove, by which she's drawing life energy from Gwen: Suzie's only still alive because she's stealing life from Gwen, and Gwen doesn't know it yet. Of course the first thing Jack and Owen do is call for Gwen, but she's already gone; they'd follow her except that the power cuts out and everything goes dark. Ianto thought Jack initiated the lockdown, and they realize it must have something to do with Suzie.

Now, most of the team realizes what Suzie is, but Gwen doesn't until her slow decline suddenly crescendos to a blinding headache and bleeding skull. Suzie explains that Gwen's being shot in the head, slowly, and that it will hurt a lot; as Suzie heals, Gwen takes on Suzie's mortal wound. Gwen's struggling to understand what's happening when Suzie wakes her father only to remove his breathing tube; she doesn't want to see him to say goodbye, she wants to kill him. Suzie helps the failing Gwen out of the hospital so they can make a run for it. Suzie's father dies, alone.

Back at Torchwood, the team has figured out that Suzie triggered the lockdown, but not how, until they remember the prisoner they'd brought in earlier, the murderer with the RetCon in his system. They find him in his cell, chanting lines from Emily Dickinson's "Because I could not stop for death" over and over. Jack realizes it's a verbal key that, repeated dozens of times, would trigger the lockdown, and most importantly, Suzie set the entire thing up. She conditioned Max, using RetCon and who knows what else, with psychological triggers: if he didn't see Suzie for three months, she must go on a killing spree and be sure to call out Torchwood. Max's involvement would lead them back to Suzie, and they would be forced to resurrect her. Once Suzie was resurrected, she could signal Max to recite the poem over and over, trigger the lockdown, and enable her escape. Suzie knew the Glove better than anyone, she knew she could survive indefinitely if she could make a strong enough connection with the wearer of the Glove. With Gwen Cooper reviving her, Suzie hit the jackpot. She was a completely twisted bitch, and the Pilgrim members that Max murdered were really Suzie's murders by proxy.

The team is dumbfounded to realize how Suzie played them all, and they know that she's playing Gwen at this very moment. They're helpless, though, unable to get out or even call out, until Ianto thinks to use the water tower as an antenna. Who do they call? Detective Swanson.

As Gwen slowly dies, Jack suffers the laughter of Swanson's staff as she puts him on the speaker and makes him repeat, for all to hear, that they're locked in to their own facility and need some help. All the detectives have a good laugh until Jack tells them that one of his team is in danger, and then Swanson gets serious. She gets her hands on the same copy of The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson that had been found among Suzie's things, and they try reading out various lines from poems to reverse the lockdown. Nothing works until Tosh suggest a numerical key, and the ISBN number does the trick. Jack and Owen take off after Gwen and Suzie, Owen estimating that Gwen has little time left.

Tosh tracks the girls to the hospital, but Jack and Owen don't catch up to them until they're at a dock; Suzie wants to get on the ferry and just keeps running. Gwen succumbs, finally, and Suzie gives her a quick kiss and takes off, but Jack follows her; Owen cradles the lifeless Gwen, quietly devastated. Suzie can't believe that Jack would kill her, but Jack has no problems shooting her. The only problem is she doesn't die no matter how many times he shoots. Finally, Jack realizes it's the Glove that's keeping her alive, and in a neat little scene, Tosh calls Ianto to get her a weapon; he tosses it to her, and she obliterates the Glove. In that moment, Suzie dies for the last time, and Gwen returns. With the connection broken, she apparently gets all her life's energy back.

Interspersed with all this action is a fair amount of philosophical discussion, and stark speculation about life after death. Suzie, quite contradictorily, says there's nothing, much like the young man she revived in the opening scenes of "Everything Changes." But in that nothing she apparently retained an awareness of self, so that's not exactly nothing. And later, she claims "there's something out there, and it's moving," to Gwen, quite fearfully, but she later declares with vicious glee that it was coming for Jack. To Suzie, "life is all," because she knows there's nothing else out there -- although there apparently is something else out there, she's just too afraid to find out what it is. She dismisses Gwen's afterlife ideas as "never having left primary school," but I think Gwen's vision, wherein our relatives and friends are waiting for us, is a very common one.

At any rate, Suzie is revealed here as weak and flawed, in spite of her brilliance. It wasn't the Glove that turned her, although the Glove enabled her to set her immortality plan in motion. She obsesses throughout the episode with how others saw her, and denigrates herself as bad, but she reveals her true feelings with an outburst when she realizes that it was Gwen using the Glove: "Gwen bloody Cooper!" Suzie thought Gwen was an idiot, and never wavered from that position no matter how much she'd later say what a good person Gwen was, and how much better at everything Gwen was than Suzie ever was -- so much crazy-talk, none of it sincere. Suzie detests Gwen, and is happy to use her. A healthy person wouldn't dream of implementing such a wretched scheme. For someone for whom "life is all," Suzie has a very cavalier attitude towards the value of other people's lives.

Then we have Gwen, for whom it is so important to do the right thing, to make things right whenever she can. In her naïveté, in her accepting that her co-workers' trust in Suzie is not fundamentally displaced, Gwen both reaches out and trusts Suzie, trying to help her achieve some peace before she dies again for the last time. But Gwen's not blinded by her "be nice" attitude: she's perceptive about relationships in a way that no one else at Torchwood is. Gwen points out that no one at Torchwood really knows anyone else, and so why should they be surprised to find out that Suzie was psychotic? No one argues with her, as there is nothing to argue about.

Finally, Captain Jack is called upon once again to make the decisions that are supposed to be hard, but how can anyone think it would be hard to kill Suzie (again), knowing what they now know about her? She was dead, she should stay dead, end of story. Even Suzie's attempt to claim some last bit of Gwen as reason for keeping her alive was lame; Gwen wasn't a murderous crazy woman. Aside from that, Jack has Death Issues. He has been dead so many times, and so many times he has not stayed dead. And he doesn't remember anything about being dead, either, and that idea bothers him, just as the idea of something coming for him in the dark, once he really dies, bothers him. I like the facility with which Barrowman's features fall; he's perky one second, flat-eyed and dismayed the next. My advice for Barrowman is to stop trying so hard, because we can always tell; just relax into the role and go with it. His best scenes are the quieter ones, as he tends to over-emote in the angry and excited ones. It's possible to like Jack's character even if he's a cold-hearted bastard, because he's our cold-hearted bastard, and this week, he saves Gwen.

Much to my relief, Ianto's character is rehabilitated this week as well, and he is back to the smooth competence he displayed earlier in the season. He also seems to have finally moved on from the Lisa debacle, and I have to believe all that business between him and Jack about the stopwatch is some kind of proposition, about which I do not wish to speculate further. Tosh is a bit player this week, although she has a great line about not being able to look the resurrected Suzie in the eye, so horrified is Tosh at Suzie's murder spree. Owen, too, has a much reduced role, and although he is still solicitous of Gwen, it is not obvious that their affair continues.

The entire team manages to bust Suzie's chops for her crimes, and the answer to her "Haven't I suffered enough?" is always No. It's not just that Suzie was willing to murder for her own trivial purposes, it's that they all trusted her, and she betrayed them. The first betrayal came with the murders, but the second betrayal was worse, since they all believed that she was turned by the Glove. "Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me," indeed: the second betrayal revealed Torchwood's unwillingness to believe the evidence of its own eyes, and thus they were taken in by a killer. Three innocent people died at the hand of an unwitting accomplice, an old man was murdered in his bed, and Gwen was dead for a few seconds, all because Torchwood failed to see the snake in its midst. Once they knew that Suzie was out murdering people, why didn't they thoroughly investigate her life and figure out what other illegal or questionable things she was doing? What possible excuse could there be for thinking everything would be OK, now that Suzie's dead?

Perhaps Swanson was more right than she knew, blaming the three victims' deaths on Torchwood. But having survived this crisis, the team should draw closer together -- and not just Jack and Ianto, whatever it is they're doing with that stopwatch.

_____________________________
Joan O'Connell Hedman's first sci-fi series obsession was Farscape. In addition to writing a semi-regular food column, Joan blogs at Oasis of Sanity. This article's screencaps are from The Institute, a Torchwood fan site.

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

This is really the only episode of Season One that showed promise, to me. Of course, it's a drawback that the most interesting character was killed off in Episode One and killed again here - her petulant and diabolical nature is much more interesting (and spooky!) than the rubber-masked aliens and CGI spirits. I LOVE that she had an "In Case of Death" plan. Love it. That and the Resurrection Glove are the good ideas from this season and fingers crossed that they go with that direction from the dozen other ones they tried.

Finally, while I'm complaining, I wish they had just used an entirely different character for the head of Torchwood, rather than plugging Jack into the role. He was so engaging and FUN on Doctor Who, and so lifeless (pun intended) on Torchwood. You can tell it was originally envisioned as a different character altogether and the merged Jack/Torchwood character does. not. work. Even more obvious when he pops up again on Doctor Who and is interesting again, though still saddled with that immortality/angst-generator business that will give them many more episodes of sad rooftop gazing to come. I'm just not going to make it through another season of this, I'm afraid.

Camera Obscura said...

I'm afraid that unlike Jerry Orbach, John has not discovered the dimmer switch that one must use to make the transition from the stage to TV drama. Of course, it may just be his IRL larger-than-life personality... He seems to handle the reality / game show stuff just fine. Enjoy it, even.

Word from RLD was that Torchwood was written for Barrowman, so unless Uncle Rusty's feeding us (his usual) palaver, it's just that they've chosen to make Capt. Jack so very emo for TW. Remember that for the UK airing, the first season of Torchwood fell between seasons two and three of Doctor Who. Jack had been abandoned on the TV satellite by the Doctor as "wrong" at the end of New Who season one; he's had to make his way back to Earth, ended up showing up well over a century too early, discovered he can't die, and had to live through countless wars and deaths while making his way to the Cardiff Rift and waiting for the Doctor to show up to refuel. All this has made him a might tetchy. Hope among fan-kind is that the DW season three season-ending has cleared up some of his issues and we can get a little more fun-Jack on season two of TW.

Joan said...

Like Camera Obscura, I think the multi-show development of the Captain Jack character has been problematic. The different nature of the two programs -- Dr Who ultimately optimistic and pro-humanity, with Torchwood far more willing to tell us that we're no good, never have been, and never will be -- compounds the difficulties.

I liked this episode very much, it was such a surprise to have Suzie revealed as someone so thoroughly evil, and yet able to fit right into the Torchwood team without any of them suspecting a thing. I think the Suzie/Gwen evil/good dichotomy was a bit too finely drawn, because we've seen Gwen do a number of questionable things herself, but for the purposes of this episode, it worked.

I'd like to see greater consistency in portraying all the characters. I particularly don't get how Ianto can go from being a blubbering idiot a few episodes ago back to his calm, capable and provocative self here. (Obviously, I like this Ianto a great deal more.) I'd also like the show runners to get their story straight: is Torchwood a secret or not? Gwen had never heard of it before the pilot, and she was no rookie. The show could benefit from some consistent top-down management.

That said, there's tremendous potential here. The regular cast is very appealing, and there's an infinite number of stories waiting to be spun off whatever the writers envision washing up from the Rift. I think the shorter seasons make us much less forgiving, also -- if this were an American series with a 22-episode run, I'd be a lot more tolerant of the occasional WTF episode. We're only getting a bit more than half that number each season, though, so there's basically no margin for error.

Ross Ruediger said...

RE: TW Jack Vs. DW Jack

I think what Anonymous was referring to was that, IIRC, TW was actually conceived as a project long before there was a new DW, but RTD was unable to get it off the ground. Then, after the success of DW S1, he reenvisioned it as a vehicle for Barrowman/Jack and the project was given the greenlight.

Camera Obscura wrote:

I'm afraid that unlike Jerry Orbach, John has not discovered the dimmer switch that one must use to make the transition from the stage to TV drama.

~That's~ funny.

I think Jack & John have worked better on DW because JB's theatrical acting style is far more suited to the OTT goings-on of DW. Tennant's Doctor would seem ridiculous were he to make an appearance on this show.

But what I think a major triumph was the way Jack was handled at the end of DW S3. From the very beginning of "Utopia", the Doctor seemed to know that Jack was coming in from another series - a series that was most unWholike - and he didn't like it.

If you look closely, the Jack of the final three eps of DW S3 was as far removed from the Jack of DW S1, as TW Jack was removed from the Jack of DW S1. Point being: there's been a pretty decent arc for the character. All that said, the guy does seem to relax a little bit when he's around the Doctor. It's as if Jack hates the responsibility being in charge, but on TW knows that there isn't anybody else with the knowledge to handle it. The way Jack exited the Doctor's company in S3 certainly seemed to indicate that he'll be more at ease with his leadership position in TW S2.

Ain't I quite the geek for having given it this much thought?

Between, DW, TW and the Sarah Jane series, there's been an awful lot going on behing the scenes and its amazing a lot of this stuff has been as good as it is. (Well, I'm still waaay behind on SJ, so I'm not sure about that show.)

S2 of TW has got to be a major improvement, but that's a double-edged statement because aside from the overall incohesiveness of S1 (which Joan has done an exceptional job of pointing out - often times seeing stuff I didn't think about), it's been mostly an engaging ride. My favorite ep of the season still has yet to play on BBCA.

Lastly, this episode was actually not one of my faves of TW S1 and I'm still not sure why, as I can't point to any particular thing that I didn't like about it. I need to see it again, as it's been months since I have.

Joan said...

Ross, does it make you feel any better to know that I've given it the subject a lot of thought myself? I agree with you on the contrast between S1 Jack and S3 Jack in DW; it's clear he has suffered a lot in the long, intervening years, and it's also clear that his situation scares the shit out of him. Most people would hear "you can't die" and say "Yay!" but Jack, like the Doctor, knows what that means: you keep outlasting the people you love, and there's absolutely nothing you can do about it.

I like TW's frequent contemplations of mortality.

If I had to pick a favorite episode of all that have aired to date, it would have to be "Countrycide," which kind of surprises me, but it really did everything right in spite of the bogus premise: it had the characters down, it looked fantastic, the pacing was perfect, and the guest actors were awesome.

TKKS was very good but with so much focus on Suzie, everything and everyone else got pushed to the background. It's a dicey proposition to make such an unappealing character the center of the story, and it worked here, but by the time Jack shot her, I couldn't muster an iota of sympathy. She was completely repellent, and I think that's where the problem lies. She needed to have some redeeming quality, don't you think?

Ross Ruediger said...

Joan wrote:

I agree with you on the contrast between S1 Jack and S3 Jack in DW; it's clear he has suffered a lot in the long, intervening years, and it's also clear that his situation scares the shit out of him.

It'll be fascinating to see how the Jack of TW S2 plays out. Of course I hope it's a revelation, but I also understand that responsible showrunners know that there actually ~are~ viewers who don't watch both series. Whatever is done can't rely solely on the drama presented in the last three eps of DW S3. Granted, the events of the last couple eps of TW S1 are pretty cataclysmic and should play into the dynamic of S2 regardless of what went down on WHO. (Oops! I'm getting waaay ahead.)

Having seen it through your eyes, and probably even before your POV, I'd have to count "Countrycide" as TW's finest S1 outing at this point. But like I said, my fave is yet to come. (And Joan, knowing my tastes for as long as you have, hopefully you'll know it when you see it.)

I think my biggest problem with TKKS was that it begged the question: Why the hell was she hired onto the TW team in the first place? I'm wondering if the message here is exactly how ramshackled a team is TW? What's the backstory? How did Jack put it all together? After the events of DW's "Doomsday", perhaps the government was desperate for guidance? There's plenty of time to answer these questions in subsequent seasons. If there's anything that DW's proven, it's that the showrunners have long-term plans and we'd best wait to see what's going down.

I remember my initial reaction to Rose bringing Jack back to life at the end of DW S1 was (from a Rued Morgue entry):

"One thing I’ve always wondered - did Rose bring everyone on the Game Station back to life, or just Captain Jack? It’s hard to believe she was feeling selective at the moment..."

Boy was I wrong. There was something going on there that I never saw coming.

Joan said...

I think my biggest problem with TKKS was that it begged the question: Why the hell was she hired onto the TW team in the first place?

Exactly! I was thinking this and wanted to get this point into the original write-up, but it got lost somewhere along the way. If you've looked at the Torchwood Institute website, you get an impression that they did a background check on Gwen, and so can assume that they did one on Suzie, and that such background checks would include psychological profiles. But Suzie was so slick that no one ever caught on, until it was way too late. BTW, the Suzie Costello page on that website has two documents that are obviously post-TKKS, and rather well done.

Since I tend to agree with you on what makes a fantastic episode (I can't think of one you've loved that I've not), I hope & expect I'll be able to figure out which is your favorite when I get to it.

Noel Vera said...

Favorite episode yet. Always thought the risen mitten (yech) was their best, spookiest gimmick to date. Is this the same Strong what directed Impossible Planet/Satan Pit? Starting to notice him--I think he's good, able to tell multiple lines of action without dissipating the tension too much. provided he's working on a solid script.

Steven Cooper said...

Is this the same Strong what directed Impossible Planet/Satan Pit?

Yep. Mind you, it's also the same Strong who worked on "Cyberwoman" and the "Daleks in Manhattan" two-parter...
He's also directing this year's Doctor Who Christmas special, and episode 1 of next year's series.

This is one of my favourite episodes of the season, too. I particularly like the long sequence of Gwen and Suzie in the car, with Gwen getting steadily weaker and Suzie stronger. (Although some of this was, I gather, cut in the BBCA broadcast; this episode went seriously over length in its original form -- more than 52 minutes -- and several nice bits were cut, including some more humour with Detective Swanson.)

About the only part that grated was the rather expedient plotting whereby Tosh suddenly gets the idea to use the ISBN number to reverse the lockdown -- and can enter it even with the keyboard not working because "the membrane underneath might just recognise the code"?! Never mind that that ISBN mentioned is not actually for The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson, but rather The Oxford Dictionary of Quotations -- obviously what the writers used for their research... :-)

Regarding what to expect in the next series, you might be interested in these comments from Russell T Davies in a recent interview in Doctor Who Magazine:

"The key to Series Two is that we've absolutely cracked it with Episode 1 - there's more fun. Everyone worked so hard on Series One, and it was done so fast, and darkness, again, is the thing that you grab hold of when you're working that quickly, cos there's a lot of story in darkness. It became a very dark series. If you watch my first episode, it's got a pterodactyl, and an invisible lift, and a very witty Captain Jack... but we lost some of that, because of the speed of production. However, the first episode of Series Two is rip-roaring. It's the sexiest adventure we've ever done, and Chris Chibnall's finest hour. I know there are certain sections of fandom who'd love us to say, 'We've completely revamped it, and reinvented all of the characters,' but we haven't, actually. We like those five characters, we love that cast, there are still no two-parters in it, we're keeping one-off stories each week, some sad, some lively, but a general sense of fun. Why don't they have more of a laugh? That's the natural thing that falls out of a script when you're working fast."

Noel Vera said...

Yep, noticed Strong did the Manhattan thing too. Is why I qualified the praise.

I did like Cyberwoman a lot more than most people here, it seems.

Ross Ruediger said...

Steven wrote:

Never mind that that ISBN mentioned is not actually for The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson, but rather The Oxford Dictionary of Quotations -- obviously what the writers used for their research... :-)

I am continually amazed by the little things you know.

Interesting words from RTD there. I hope TW S2 isn't ~too~ light; I really appreciate its darkness and think that's a big part of what makes the show work. The flawed nature of the characters lends itself to darkness. Also, I'd argue with RTD that the last two episodes of S1 work as a two-parter even if they aren't labeled as such.

Steven Cooper said...

Ross -

I am continually amazed by the little things you know.

I can't take the credit for it; I hang around fan forums like Outpost Gallifrey, where bloopers like this get spotted almost before the episode finishes airing... :-)

You're right about the last two episodes being a two-parter; I vaguely remember reading somewhere that they started out as quite separate stories, with the links between them being introduced during the writing process. As for Series Two, I wouldn't mind the tone being brought back closer to "Everything Changes", but the biggest problem that needs to be fixed is the inconsistent characterisation. If they can find a way to believably develop the characters from episode to episode (as only happened occasionally in Series One), I'll be happy.

Anonymous said...

This is the first poster anonymous.. yes, I was referring to the fact that Torchwood was conceived before Doctor Who.

I did in fact LOVE Jack's reappearance on Doctor Who S3. Part of why is a decision they seemed to make about how to handle Jack's immortality, in a way similar to how a similar character was handled in Neil Gaiman's Sandman series.

Hob Gadling was also an ordinary human who was suddenly gifted with immortality and lived many centuries without aging or being killed (although I don't know what a good stabbing would do for him, that was never really detailed). The downside of this was nicely observed, in that every person he knew would age and die, and he could never stay the same place for very long before someone would notice that he never did. He had wives and children and they all aged and died. He lived through terrible periods of history and witnessed awful behavior and humanities disinclination to grow or learn. And yet, near the end of the series, he is given the opportunity to finally die, and see whatever it is that happens next, if anything. He actually declines. In spite of it all, he doesn't want to stop. Because when you get down to it, living is just so *interesting*.

That's why Jack's enthusasm at the end of time tickled me - even after a very long life he's still excited at the possibilities of what's out there, and giddy with the knowledge that if he waits around long enough, he'll get to see it all. He's got time, after all. THAT'S the way to play it, to balance out the emo tragedy part. It makes so much sense for the themes of the Who/Torchood universe to play it out that way, I'm tempted to FedEx RTD a copy of "Men of Good Fortune" just to make sure that he does.

(I know noone's reading this comment thread anymore, but I wanted to throw that out there.)

Lioness said...

Tosh states in the episode that they tried to investigate Suzie's past after her suicide, but she had destroyed all the records.

"I'd like to see greater consistency in portraying all the characters. I particularly don't get how Ianto can go from being a blubbering idiot a few episodes ago back to his calm, capable and provocative self here. (Obviously, I like this Ianto a great deal more.)"

Ianto had been carrying a great deal of longterm grief and stress for months. I would find him much less believable if he was his usual self under those circumstances. It's very much to Gareth David-Loyd's credit how subtly he takes Ianto through the stages of the cycle of mourning: denial in Cyberwoman, shock in Small Worlds, anger in Countrycide, despair in GBG, and acceptance in TKKS.