Wednesday, September 26, 2007

"On the Circuit": Redacted

By Keith Uhlich

Screened at the 45th New York Film Festival.

[Editor's Note: "On The Circuit" is a joint production of The House Next Door and Zoom In Online. For news, events, training, and other points of interest to the creative community, please visit Zoom In Online by clicking here.]

From its opening image (wherein a tried-and-true “Based on actual events” crawl is slowly blacked out to reveal the film’s title), Redacted revels in a mixed, often muddled sense of humor and horror. Those who sense a touch of the late-night sketch comic in Brian De Palma’s latest are not far off from the point -- Redacted is as much about media infiltration of the senses as it is about documenting (by fictionalizing) the 2006 rape of a teenage Iraqi girl (Zahara Al Zubaidi), and the subsequent murder of herself and her family by several members of the US military. For a Western populace reported to receive the majority of its information via a steady diet of televisual punditry-cum-burlesque, it is somehow perversely appropriate that Redacted represents the basest elements of our nature via a coarse Chris Farley clone (Kel O'Neill). But the joke is not just on us; nor, risking reductive semantics, is it just on them.

Whatever De Palma’s personal politics (and Redacted represents these in quite plain, left-slanted sight), he’s also a believer in the camera as intermediary, as an interpretive instrument with a life all its own. On one level, Redacted seems a rough, present-tense assemblage of various aural/visual media sources (security cameras, personal video diaries, Internet postings, and faux-documentaries), but the homogenized Hi-Def sheen under which all these elements unfold emphasizes the inherently fictive nature of the piece as a whole. The pretense-laden French-doc-within, Barrage, further gives the game away, what with its hilarious cribs from The Wild Bunch and Barry Lyndon, and subtitles that seem tailored to audiences both within and without Redacted’s demi-imaginary universe. The formal play is almost always apparent in De Palma’s work (and he finally gets to explicitly reference an oft-cited influence, Appointment in Samarra, John O'Hara's novel-via-Maugham), but it’s particularly unsettling here in ways that inspire simultaneous cries, at least from this long-time member of the De Palma-phile peanut gallery, of both “Bravo!” and “Bullshit!”

Two highly varied viewings of Redacted suggest it is a work to be grappled with, but more for what it has to say about the invasive and mutative effects of media than for the soul-crushing horrors of the War in Iraq. Taken as a statement, definitive or otherwise, on the current imbroglio, Redacted is a failure, its performers too stiff and stagebound (or cartoonishly overemphatic), its horrors aesthetically distanced as opposed to transgressive. Naming the film's most morally conflicted character Lawyer (Rob Devaney) and one of its primary bad apples Flake (Patrick Carroll) shows that De Palma isn't out for subtlety, but his cast of unknowns are unable to give these archetypal constructs the necessary inflections that would raise their onscreen dialogues/actions to the resonant level of myth.

No one sequence in Redacted approaches Eriksson's (Michael J. Fox) canted point-of-view shot in Casualties of War as he observes his squadron raping the young Vietnamese girl Oahn (Thuy Thu Le), a multilayered assault on both the body and the body politic, profoundly illuminated by the spiritual gaze of cinema. Redacted, in contrast, stays continuously down and dirty, earthbound. De Palma's aesthetic choices tend towards the obvious: the rape here is shot through a nightvision filter, giving the participants' eyes, whatever the position of their respective moral compasses, a demonic glint, and reinforcing the film's decided lack of an omniscient presence. The Aesop dictum is all-too-apparent: War is hell.

De Palma's bluntness typically masks a cuttingly direct subtext, but here he more often trades illumination for crude, confrontational effects. I am willing to concede that this is to some degree the goal, and certainly the rawness of Redacted contributes as much to its successful shadings as to its failed ones. When De Palma turns his gaze to the Internet, the film's satire becomes trenchant. Ideologies of all stripes are skewered with gleeful abandon, an angry teen's rant against the United States government coming off with about the same (nonexistent) amount of discernment as the clandestine comings-and-goings captured by Islamofascist webcams. These sections also house the film's best performance, by Bridget Barkan as a tearful soldier's wife who blogs about her most intimate fears and trepidations.

De Palma understands both the connective and divisive possibilities of technology, but Redacted ultimately errs more on the side of doomsday than redemption. As in The Black Dahlia, De Palma casts himself in a crucial offscreen role in Redacted's penultimate scene, prodding one of his characters to "tell us a war story," then insisting (after said character's none-too-convincing moment of onscreen moral crisis) that "I need to get my picture." What follows this meta confessional is a series of purportedly real snapshots of wartime atrocities (most of them redacted against the writer/director's will) that effectively sum up the numerous frustrations of De Palma's cri de coeur. Indeed, the swell of a Puccini aria over the final (staged) image is as charged and troubling an ending as this great director has given us -- the movie-long meld of the fictional with the factual comes full circle, and this strange, off-putting Hi-Def experiment more or less implodes in an implicit admission of its own ineffectiveness. Maybe that is De Palma's final insult/insight: So much blood spilled over so little.
___________________________________________
Keith Uhlich is co-editor of The House Next Door and a contributor to various print and online publications.

4 comments:

Geoff said...

Keith, I haven't yet seen REDACTED, but from your review (which is wonderfully articulated) my first thought is that it sounds like De Palma has made one of his essentially-De Palma films. Films where he wrote and directed, like DRESSED TO KILL, BLOW OUT, RAISING CAIN, FEMME FATALE, that breathe De Palma's wit and sardonic touches, yet can still manage moments of such emotional power that you forget you were laughing at anything, ever. For instance, BLOW OUT begins with a wild parody of slasher films that ends up host to something deeply disturbing in the most helpless sense. Blending humor and horror is an old idea, I know, but what De Palma does sometimes feels much different. Even something like CARLITO'S WAY can feature swift tonal shifts-- startlingly slapstick in one instant (Benny Blanco callously shooting Carlito, and then as an aside, killing Pachanga), but sweepingly emotional the next (as Carlito tries to pass his dream onto his lover and their child). In the "essentially-De Palma" films, these tonal shifts seem more embedded than in projects where he works with another screenwriter, such as CASUALTIES OF WAR. I wish I could comment on REDACTED, but I will have to wait. Thanks for the review.

Adam N said...

Hey Keith,

that's a very fine review, but as we discussed in T.O., I think De Palma deserves the benefit of the doubt here (and I am usually a Doubting Thomas when it comes to his work). To me, the movie works interestingly with and against Casualties of War; the earlier film was expressionistic because it had the distance of a dream -- it quite literally began with a drifty remembrance. Redacted is impacted because it's in the present tense; De Palma's feelings aren't resolved because the situation in Iraq isn't resolved. The film is like shrapnel, and if that means its aim is sometimes indiscriminate, it also means there's none of the numbing "precision" of a lot of celluloid anti-war statements. I think Redacted's contradictions and occassional failures are inspiring, as they suggest an artist wrestling with himself -- his politics, his aesthetics, his responsibilities -- to react to something he's deeply engaged with. I guess it's this quality of engagement that puts the film over the top for me. In the past, I've subscribed to the idea (rejected, I'm sure, by your De Palma-admiring self) that the director has been an opportunist -- that he never really "meant it." (Well, he did in Blow Out). Here, he means it, and I mean it when I say Redacted is a very strong movie. As for the acting, the question of the characters' performativity is one that I wish more critics would consider; the performances change in the scenes where the characters are unaware they're being observed, and these shifts are consistent.

Jordan Hoffman said...

Keith -
Great review. Looking forward to this. Formally, sounds like more of a flashback to "Hi, Mom" than "Casualties of War"

Peet said...

Thanks for this fascinating review, Keith. Adam's justifications for the shortcomings you noted make sense to me, but I'd have to see Redacted for myself. After all, I felt similarly conflicted about The Black Dahlia about a year ago, for very different reasons.