Now playing worldwide, Sunshine will open in the U.S. on September 14th. Release date subject to change.
___________________________________________
By Peet Gelderblom
Sunshine, a sci-fi epic, directed by Danny Boyle, about a team of scientists sent on a mission to reignite a dying sun, is neither a mindless Michael Bay extravaganza nor a chin-strokey affair in the vein of Andrei Tarkovsky's Solaris. It's the cinematic oxymoron many of us have been waiting for: the thinking man's action movie. It also happens to be gobsmackingly stunning, ruthlessly intense, handsomely cast and blessed with a 100% insane last act that won't be everyone's cup of tea, but had yours truly grinning from ear to ear. Danny Boyle's Sunshine is a spectacle quite impossible to put into words, and that's exactly what makes it brilliant cinema--albeit the kind that's difficult to defend on theoretical grounds.
Imagine what it would feel like to cut yourself off from everything that made you the person that you are and veer so close to the source of life that it could kill you in a flash. To be humanity's only hope, face God and destiny head-on and gradually lose your mind when you realize what that actually means. As you're watching this film unfold, you sense that the scientists of Icarus II have reached the very boundaries of human comprehension and need to overcome a cultivated fear of the unknown. The film starts off rationally, even grounded scientifically, but then almost completely derails into utter madness, crossing beyond all logic to culminate in a deeply emotional apotheosis during which much is felt and little is explained. It's a bold conceptual turn, and marvelously executed on a stylistic level.
In an inversion of genre convention, blinding light is the antagonist for which the vast cloak of darkness surrounding the spaceship provides feeble shelter. With a drama so centered on the conflict between the seen and the unseen, it comes as no surprise that the true star of Sunshine is the cinematography. Boyle and his D.O.P. Alwin Kulcher found a way to photograph light as an almost physical presence by shooting scenes involving artificial light with anamorphic lenses, causing flares to appear distorted, and by using standard Super 35mm lenses for circular flares whenever rays of sunshine seep in. (A similar friction of styles can be found in the score: a hybrid of Underworld's electronica and John Murphy's classical orchestrations.) At crucial moments, long lenses narrow the spectator's focus to both breathtaking and unsettling effect, and near the end all sense of focus is thrown out of the window. The editing, while fairly traditional at first, becomes increasingly frenetic, with subliminal shots (was that a face?!?) and freeze frames at the moment you least expect them. In terms of sound, Boyle finds an effective middle ground to Ben Burtt's cartoony effects in Star Wars and Stanley Kubrick's naturalistic use of total silence in 2001, using abstract sound design to support the outer space action.
Don't expect 2001: The Next Generation, though. Alex Garland's screenplay is pretty lean in terms of story (in the way that Jaws can be described as lean) and is more concerned with psychological suspense as opposed to philosophical speculation. As a sensory experience, however, Sunshine is profound. In a print interview for Empire magazine, Boyle has compared his film to "mountain movies," arguing that it's "finally more about experience than an idea." This seems to be the impression of most European reviewers who've written about Sunshine, and unfortunately this has led some to unjustly criticize the film (and especially the third act) for being unbalanced, confused or even shallow.
It makes you wonder why film as pure experience is often frowned upon in critical circles, as if "visceral" is synonymous to "cheap thrills." By the same token: is it "shallow" to be in love, dance to music, or enjoy a hot bath after a dreadful day? Experiences can shatter your senses, shake you up or enlighten the mind. It's not shallow to travel around the globe, is it? Seriously, if you're looking for transcendent significance, nothing beats a cup of espresso at the moment you need it the most, a breath of fresh air down the seashore, or having the fuck of a lifetime. What are we but a (re)collection of experiences?
Of all the arts, cinema is arguably the most ideal in evoking a genuine sense of experience. Sunshine is a prime example. If, like me, you're a sucker for blissful atmospherics with a dark, imaginative edge, I doubt you'll come across a better cinematic trip this year.
__________________________________________
Peet Gelderblom directs, edits and develops commercials, TV programs and broadcast design in Amsterdam. He's the founding editor of 24LiesASecond and doodles film-related cartoons on a blog called Lost in Negative Space.
Wednesday, May 16, 2007
Sunshine and The Cinematic Experience
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
I had downloaded a(n il)legal copy of this movie, and just about started watching it yesterday, when I thought it better to stick it out and wait until September to see it how it should be seen.
Judging from that last line, looks like I made the right choice!
Peet,
I hate to be a nit-picker, but wasn't Children of Men the thinking man's action film we've all been waiting for? Or was that Letters From Iwo Jima? Days of Glory? I guess the thinking man really has his choice when it comes to action movies of late.
It's about time we're taken seriously as a target audience! You're quite right about Children of Men, Dan. The action in Sunshine is much more enjoyable, though...
And Pacheco: Be sure to catch this at the biggest movie theatre you can find!
While I found Sunshine enjoyable enough at the start and I was able to overlook various devices that seemed to derive from reality TV (like Survivor or Big Brother), and while I found it visually stunning (especially on a small budget), I had other problems with it.
I thought the transition from a 2001: A Space Odyssey or Solaris wannabe to an Alien wannabe didn't work. The continuity lacked and the shaky camera cheapened the whole thing. We never got to see what the creature looked like properly and I found it very frustrating.
If interested, check out my take.
And then there's that other "thinking person's horror film"...28 WEEKS LATER...which is also quite good.
Here's my review...
http://www.slantmagazine.com/film/film_review.asp?ID=2969
I second what Jeremiah said. 28 Weeks Later is my favorite film of the year at this point, as I think any one scene in it completely owns both United 93 and World Trade Center when it comes to evoking a worthwhile feeling or statement on our post-9/11 world. And while I liked Planet Terror, it's refreshing to have a truly serious zombie movie back in the multiplexes. I hope to see it a second time in the next few days.
I have seen Sunshine already, and I more or less agree with everything Peet said: the film isn't all that deep in theory, but that's a bullshit means of analysis in my book. And while I don't think Boyle is some revolutionary by any means, his haters often seem to be passively comparing him to some of the greater directors in their criticisms. Nothing about his work has ever struck me as lacking its own sense of appropriate legitimacy, and nor do I think Sunshine is really attempting to be like it's stylistic predecessors. Parts of it did annoy me - namely one or two really small things that should have just been seen and felt rather than explicitly explained - but for the most part I think it's one hell of a cinematic fever dream. I guess it's just a reaction thing, too, but the final act of the movie seemed perfectly in keeping with the first, and almost a necessary continuation on its philosophical themes. I especially liked Boyle's use of soft focus and distorted imagery, as if the film itself were being manipulated by the schizo space/time field around the sun.
I was quite taken with "28 Weeks Later" -- I liked the original, too, but thought the sequel was superior in many ways. I meant to post a review of it by now but time kept slipping away from me. Maybe I'll try to do it today or tomorrow.
I just flinched like four times..."28 Weeks Later" was dreadful...refuse that shouldn't have been bothered with. The first said it spectacularly without having a "zombie" (there were no zombies in the first film!) somehow follow his children around a city after they've been in a car for who knows how long...ack!
"Sunshine"! I wholeheartedly disagree with with the idea that there are no deeper ideas in Sunshine. Yes, I was blown away on a visceral level, from start to finish, and while I was a bit thrown by the shifting genres mid movie, I understood the need for that element to exist, because it made sense on a theory level. The mistake here is to say that the movie is a psychological this or that, and then say that the psychology has no meaning, which makes no sense. Even the craziness in the end is explained in a scientific way earlier in the script, which it seems like most people who don't get it, must have missed.
I too have a whole blog about it at my little home on the web. You should be able to click my name and get there, if not, http://philzine.wordpress.com
Another thing I take a minor issue with is to say it's less a thinking man's film because it has action and suspense in it, unlike one of my favorite films Tarkovsky's "Solaris". "2001" also had action and suspense elements, as did "Event Horizon" (which I thought was a bit of a thinker.) I think it's just as much a chin-strokey film!
Post a Comment