Monday, March 05, 2007

The Parallel-Universe Monster's Ball: Craig Brewer's Black Snake Moan

By Steven BooneIn Black Snake Moan, Samuel L. Jackson bathes Christina Ricci and they don't end up having sex. Ricci's character is not a paraplegic. She needs no help reaching those hard-to-reach places. And there is no indication that Jackson's character suffers from erectile dysfunction or blindness. In fact, he's so heartbroken over a divorce and so wound up with sexual frustration that he strums the blues guitar the way you'd caress your lover. But despite having chained and imprisoned Ricci's nymphomaniacal character Rae in his home for several days, forming a genuine lonelyhearts bond with her over Southern cuisine, Blues music and lost loves, he wants nothing more than to get Rae's shoulder's Zestfully clean. See, he's a God-fearin' man; he only wants to help Rae come to terms with the history of abuse that provokes her reckless promiscuity. Despite the deranged, combustible chemistry that has developed between Rae and Lazarus (Jackson) in the Bluesman’s backwoods love shack, he sees her more as the daughter he never had. Sex? Lawdy, no. Jus'wouldn't be right.

Do I really need to get into how this plays out? A.O. Scott gave us the whole story in an alternate title: “Chaining Miss Daisy to the Radiator in Her Underwear.” Lazarus and Rae become everything to each other but lovers, and, once they've helped each other gain insight into their problems, pair off with age-and-race-appropriate mates. Buh-bye. It's the parallel-universe Monster's Ball. Instead of hot, sweaty miscegenation arising out of a dramatic situation that didn't ask for it (Billy Bob Thornton fucking Halle Berry's pain away), Black Snake Moan gets sloppy drunk, cries out for apocalyptic sex and then soberly zips its fly. That kind of restraint would be cool if it served to intensify the struggle between Lazarus, Rae and their unruly desires. But Brewer's protagonists don't have desires so much as aberrant physical compulsions that arise from traumatic memories and lack of love. Once they sort the whole business out, their choices become clearcut. They can then quit their foolish association before it Goes Too Far.

Damn shame, because the second act of Black Snake Moan (before Jackson returns to his designated position as Bojangles to Ricci's Shirley Temple) is white hot and hilarious. Brewer's pedestrian exposition gives way to emotional realism and playful, rhythmic mindfucking. Brewer, cinematographer Amy Vincent, editor Billy Fox, and Brewer’s sound crew orchestrate a dazzling tug of war over Rae's clanking, phallic chain. The chain becomes another protagonist, a totem of infinite pop, sexual, racial and historical allusions. It snaps taut like the surging erection Lazarus is too decent to have; coils like a Biblical serpent around Rae's curves when she's writhing in heat. In a brief scene that could unite BDSM pros, Black History professors and ambivalent Klansmen, Rae leads Lazurus through his own farmland, nearly seducing him with her jiggling ass and yanking the chain imperiously, as if she were the slavemaster here. This delirious moment deserves its own book of analysis. But don’t think “arid art film.” The good parts of Black Snake Moan achieve the oily ‘70s sexploitation groove its poster promises.

Still, Brewer’s pulpy tabloid sensationalism (as gaudy as the blue gator boots on the local barfly) is half-hearted. As with Hustle & Flow, Brewer initially makes grotesque spectacle out of a selfish and cruel supposed predator (Djay in H&F, Rae in BSM) only to reveal the wounded human being underneath. The change-up is never quite believable, a kind of canned, TV humanism. Even so, he draws natural performances from his actors when in warm/fuzzy mode. When his characters are pregnant with pent up emotions, he can write long, tender, unpredictable scenes that ring true, like the meeting between Djay and Skinny Black in Hustle & Flow. Likewise, despite lapsing into to a mediocre indie handholder in its third act, this stretch of the film also pulls some surprisingly rich emotional chords from Justin Timberlake as Rae’s nervous wreck of a boyfriend. Timberlake, barely convincing as the tough guy in Alpha Dog, here shows that his true strength as an actor is lovesick vulnerability. I never quite believed the suave, aggressive image Timberlake promotes as a pop star. His eyes are soft and uncertain, and his voice evokes a sheltered teen suburbanite. But in Black Snake Moan, his presence fits his boyish character -- the town tramp's G.I. boyfriend, Ronnie -- perfectly. Timberlake makes Ronnie's devotion to Rae understandable and affecting. He could put Jeremy Davies out of business.

No matter how nice a boy Timberlake is, though, Black Snake Moan ultimately fails at its mission to rile up black/white, red/blue America because it doesn’t let Rae and Lazarus have sex -- and I mean sprawling, World War III sex. Rainer Werner Fassbinder let an elderly German widow and a hulking Black Arab become lovers in Ali: Fear Eats the Soul, and it brought the neuroses of an entire nation into view. Like Ali and Emmie, Lazarus and Rae are soulmates; the casting choices, virile Jackson and luscious Ricci, confirm this. Each of these two bug-eyed, compulsively defiant actors has a lyrical way with insults, curse words and a general surly cynicism. Their onscreen relationship gets several lovely symbolic consummations, including those infamous baths, and two scenes in which Lazarus serenades Rae into a saucer-eyed lather. The look that Rae gives him, with her head resting in his lap as he massages the electric guitar, signals the start of a lovemaking reverie -- and complex aftermath -- that could have changed film history.

Instead, Brewer succumbs to the fear of a black penis that afflicts the Ho’wood system he’s presumably out to bedevil, and sends everybody back to their segregated corners, fully clothed. Do-over.
__________________________________________________
Steven Boone is a New York-basic critic and filmmaker, a contributor to Vinyl is Heavy and the publisher of the pop culture blog Big Media Vandalism.

25 comments:

Matt Zoller Seitz said...

I haven't seen this one yet, but am going to catch it today or tomorrow. It's funny that, on the same day that you publish this review, Keith links to a Quentin Tarantino interview in the London Times in which, among other things, he discusses how his new movie with Robert Rodriguez, "Grindhouse," came about via hanging out in QT's house with Rodriguez amid the former's sizable collection of B-movie posters. "I have posters all over my house from the 1950s and 1960s, double-feature posters. I want to deliver what these posters promise, but those movies never delivered."

The "Black Snake Moan" poster should be up there soon.

Matt Zoller Seitz said...

Also, House contributer Annie Frisbie's review from the film's Sundance screening.

"Flannery O'Connor described her approach to storytelling by saying, 'you have to make your vision apparent by shock--to the hard of hearing you shout, and for the blind you draw large and startling figures.' Underneath the kinky visuals and shocking premise, Brewer is actually making a serious point about the right and wrong ways that men treat women. Or, to quote Luscious Jackson, 'When a man knows where he came from/He can tell me I am shameful/And I will call him supersolid.'"

Annie Frisbie said...

Thanks to Matt for posting the quote from my Sundance review. I just saw the movie again yesterday & liked it even more the 2nd time around. (Except for father-of-the-year at the end of my row, who brought his 4-year-old and his disabled 9-year-old to see the film. Nice.)

I would've left this movie in a storm of righteous fury if Brewer had had Laz and Rae do the deed. It would've been H&F all over again--men have the weight of the world on their shoulders, but they've got women to fuck & make it all okay.

I'm sorry, but the movie sets up Rae as the victim of child rape. What she needs is a father, not another sex partner. Isn't it painfully clear that all sex is for Rae--apart from Ronnie--is just self-obliteration? She wants sex with love and committment and tenderness. The last thing she needs or wants is another notch on the bedpost.

Brewer sidesteps the argument that this is just another Driving Miss Daisy--black men and white women should only ever be platonic--ten minutes into the movie with the most graphic scene in the film, Rae getting it from behind by the biggest black man in town.

Another thing--it's a relief and a pleasure to see a film that shows a middle-aged man pursing a middle-aged woman. That never, ever happens in the movies. The standard for movie relationships and marriages is that the women are always 10-15 years (sometimes more, Harrison Ford) than the men. I loved seeing Laz woo Angela, and watching her glow like a girl in the light of his attention. Black women of a certain age are ALWAYS desexualized in movies--thank you, Black Snake Moan for not going this route.

BSM might not fulfill male fantasies, but it's a movie for women who are tired of seeing men get all their fantasies fulfilled.

Simon Crowe said...

Indeed, sex between Lazarus and Rae would have been ridiculous and arguably even more offensive than the chain. I think BSM's biggest problem was that it finds some vague spiritual power in the junction of blues, religion, and sex that's about as original as a PBS pledge week special. (When the preacher and the teenage boy didn't rat out Lazarus, I knew the deck was stacked) I never believed for a second that anything Lazarus did enabled Rae's big confrontation with her mother. Ricci was terrific, but in service of what?

Anonymous said...

AF gets it right, me thinks. Not that this is a smackdown. But, all the reviews that treat the relationship as sexual just don't ring true.

Steven Boone said...

Annie: "BSM might not fulfill male fantasies, but it's a movie for women who are tired of seeing men get all their fantasies fulfilled."

Perhaps, but it's also the movie that will exasperate black men who are weary of having their sexuality rendered, by turns, invisible and grotesque. If that were Michael Douglas bathing Thandie Newton in that tub, we know where that moment would have led, right or wrong.

But that's almost beside the point. Lazarus and Rae should have made love not to get male rocks off but because they were in love. Should the gorgeous sex scene in Old Boy not have happened because of the tragic 3rd-act revalation? Should sex in any film happen only when it is morally appropriate, hygenic, approved by Dr. Alvin F. Poussaint? Are we talking about art or a Diff'rent Strokes episode?

Lazarus and Rae displayed a kinship that cried out for a partnership. Her puppy love travails with Ronnie were small potatoes. She goes for Lazarus not because he's the best pipe-layer in town, no, but because he knows what she needs (not sex) and cares enough to see that she gets it. Ronnie himself said he couldn't "fix" Rae, but Lazarus could.

The spectacle of a desperate, carnal, loving, perfectly doomed Laz/Rae coupling, with, as I said, all the attendant real world complications... would have been equal to the film's ambitions. A flick that starts off flipping the bird literally and metaphorically would have been truly challenging if it had burrowed much deeper into the fantasy/nightmare it set up and then crash-landed into reality rather than gently parachuting down into the same ol white liberal cabbage patch of healing and bonding.

I liken this film to Monster's Ball because, like Marc Forster's song of the south, it refuses to be about what it's really about (imdb keywords for Monster's Ball: Male Nudity / Explicit Sex / Temper Tantrum / Orgasm / Anal Sex)-- out of some bullshit sense of civic responsibility.

Annie Frisbie said...

Well, I can just imagine the look of disappointment and hurt on Angela's face at finding out that Laz was happy to throw her over for a white teenager. Talk about desexualized. A woman like that? She's the monster of our popular imagination (Norbit etc). She's not a person. Nobody cares whether or not she might want to get laid, or have romance, or have someone pursue her honestly and genuinely.

I think we just read Laz & Rae's relationship differently. I saw father/daughter. And if father has sex with daughter, we call that incest or rape. We call that what's been done to Rae her whole life.

It's so telling when Rae says, "It's okay. I'm grown." That, more than anything, makes her a child. She acts like a child. Ronnie's a child, too--with his soft face and tears. Children belong with other children. Adults belong with other adults. Honestly, I'd read pederasty into a love scene between Rae and Laz, not a connection between equals. Angela has her own home, a good job, a life that she enjoys. She's Laz's equal. Don't deny her that.

What's the quote that they use at Rae & Ronnie's wedding? "When I was a child..."

It's not about sanitizing all sex all the time. It's about saying that not all male/female relationships have to be about sex. I mean, that's the only lesson girls learn from popular media--Pussycat Dolls, Bratz, stripper culture--a girl is only worth something if a man wants to have sex with her. That's Rae's problem entirely. She has no conception of her value as a human being, and only a father can give her that--just like her stand-in father, her mother's boyfriend, took it away.

As Chris Rock said when his daughter was born, "It's my job to keep her off the pole."

Steven Boone said...

Annie: "Well, I can just imagine the look of disappointment and hurt on Angela's face at finding out that Laz was happy to throw her over for a white teenager."

You don't have to imagine it; it's there in the film when he carries Rae out of the grocery store. And, sitcom-style, Brewer does nothing with it, breezes right past her possible suspicions, wants, resenments, etc. and drags her back onstage only to be the matronly bridesmaid. She's as asexual as Merkeson's other iconic character, Reba the Mail Lady. This is beautiful: "Nobody cares whether or not she might want to get laid, or have romance, or have someone pursue her honestly and genuinely." Least of all Brewer, I dare say.

And, no, I don't think this skinny, mangy white teenager is the woman of Laz's dreams. But I thought the point of the film was that Laz and Rae are all fuctup. Yes, he's older and stronger than this lil girl, but a wounded lion can exhibit some strange, fascinating behavior.

I think your analysis of the film's psychology is laser sharp. I don't challenge it at all. The problem is that Brewer has an entirely different, leering, taboo-jostling movie going on in the middle stretch, and it has nothing to do with molestation or Daddy issues, but miscegenation and its discontents. Race matters, as some dude said, and by making Sam J the daddy/healer to this white woman, Brewer has primed an explosive only to diffuse it. As I mentioned in my response to your review, Rae's healing would have been revelatory and even heart-stealing if a young, white bruiser--the kind of kid who'd frat-rape her in a second--were administering the spiritual medicine while keeping his pants on. It would have given jerks and jerkoffs everywhere serious pause.

I'm glad you quoted Chris Rock, the introspective, upright black comedian who also said that brothers have to confront a serious impending crisis-- "WHITE girls with BLACK girls' asses! How can a black man protect himself?"

Even though he's busy remaking a Wertmuller film, I wouldn't turn to confused conservative Rock for insight into a work as complicated as BSM.

Steven Boone said...

oh, and Annie, you said: "Brewer sidesteps the argument that this is just another Driving Miss Daisy--black men and white women should only ever be platonic--ten minutes into the movie with the most graphic scene in the film, Rae getting it from behind by the biggest black man in town."

Rae gets it from behind by a grimacing black gorilla, not a man-- the same kind of gorilla that Michael Douglas's daughter had to endure at her lowest point of cracked-out desperation in Traffic.

Grotesque, violent and hateful sex between a black man and white woman is somehing Ho'wood grins and bears. But a real physical/spiritual connection between the two is still a filmmaking felony. In what Armond White would call the "prison of white imagination," you can only have one or the other--the lust or the love--onscreen at one time.

Andrew Dignan said...

This exchange between Annie and Steve reminds me of when film theorist B. Ruby Rich came to speak at my college when I was a Freshman, and how much difficulty she found in being a champion of Silence of the Lambs. Rich, a lesbian, couldn’t deny the homophobia in the film but also considered the film a treatise on feminism in popular culture. I guess, sometimes, one under-represented or marginalized group is promoted at the expense of another.

Now, having just said that, I completely agree with Annie here: Laz and Rae having sex would have sent the film into completely different stratosphere of offensiveness and not because it infringes upon some perceived taboo of a white woman and a black man having a romantic relationship. The film is keenly (and explicitly aware) of race relations with the two most prominent white male characters shown expressing anxiety over the fact that Rae has a history of being with black men (and it’s not expressed anywhere near that civically in the film) and as Annie points out, the film doesn’t shy away from showing us her having sex with Tehronne. Even Laz makes mention of how it would be perceived by the local authorities if he called them out to retrieve a beat-up half naked white woman from his home.

This isn’t a film about a red-hot love affair between Ricci and Jackson, but about a broken man treating a broken woman with the respect that she refuses to treat herself with for the first time in her life, first and foremost by not taking advantage of her (the titter factor here is he does it by chaining her half-naked to the radiator). The middle section of the film (when she’s a prisoner) is sexually-charged but it struck me entirely as a one-way street, with Jackson largely impatient with Ricci’s lack of restraint, often giving her the rueful look of a pet owner whose puppy won’t stop wetting the carpet.

Yes it’s tender and loving (and the imagery of him bathing her is heavily weighted) but it struck me as entirely paternal in nature. She’s literally a little girl, curled up on the floor looking up admiringly in some scenes, who never experienced childhood and Sam ultimately becomes her protector. Keeping her safe from the dark during the rain storm. Washing off her scuffed elbows and placing a band aid on them. And mostly, saving her from her own horrible tendencies.

For them to have sex or even toe that line would negate the whole purpose of the film. After all that time spent building her up as something more than just an object for other’s sexual gratification, he then turns that around on her and seduces her? In light of what we learn about her and her father? That’s just evil. It would make everything he’s done for her entirely self-serving. Brewer and Paramount may be selling the film as some sort of white sex slave exploitation flick but don’t mistake the poster for the message and intent of the film.

Steven Boone said...

Andrew, like Annie's, your analysis of what Brewer is up to is flawless. The difference between us is that y'all applaud the filmmaker's hypocrisy and emotional dishonesty while I cannot countenance it. Black Snake Moan is a Russ Meyer film edited by Micheel Medved.

Andrew Dignan said...

Steve:

I don’t deny that there’s something of a bait and switch going on somewhere between the leering set-up and the everyone paired-off with their age and race “appropriate” mate by end credits, but as I said I think that has more to do with the buttons the film is intentionally pushing both with its subject matter (I would argue a synopsis of the film would be a lot more offensive than the film ultimately is) and its entire marketing campaign from the title on down than anything in the film, which when it comes right down to it struck me as almost square in its middle-America, wholesomeness. Right from the first few minutes of the film we’re lead to believe that nymphomania or not, Rae is meant for Ronnie and she is deeply disturbed and saddened by him leaving. Likewise Laz is devastated by losing his (younger) wife who has jumped into another man’s bed leaving him the cuckold.

So right off the bat we’ve established not only that Rae is already meant for someone and that no matter what twists in the road she goes on, the only person she “should” end up with is him and that Lazarus has been wronged by a sexually promiscuous woman. Good storytelling tells us that these two parallel plots will intertwine with one another leading each to the other’s salvation which in this case ends with her keeping her demons in check and ending up in a nurturing relationship with her true love and him falling for a contemporary woman who will treat him right. Lazarus becoming physically involved with Rae might momentarily tear down a wall in the way intimacy is shown between blacks and whites, but as you initially mentioned it would be just as dopey as when it happened in Monster’s Ball the only difference being the races would be reversed. It would betray the characters and exist solely for shock value, which in turn would make the film legitimately guilty of being racially insensitive.

Monster’s Ball taught us that a hardened white racist could be more tolerant and loving by having sex with a black woman who happens to look like Halle Berry (Jesus, who couldn’t?) But what would this proposed version of Black Snake Moan say? A sexually abused white woman is “cured” of her wanton-sexuality by being fucked by (to quote Spike Lee) “the mystical negro?” Wouldn’t that just be fulfilling some “Mandingo-like” fantasy which fails to address the needs of either character in a realistic way? Forget self-esteem and self-worth and learning you’re not just a sexual plaything, let me just unzip my fly and I’ll straighten you right out.

Brewer’s game, both here and in Hustle & Flow (which I should probably confess now, that I loved), is to present very simple stories of faith and redemption and aspirations of rising above your station in life under a slathering of matted hair and sin and writhing bodies in the backseat; it’s as though if such lofty goals as “following your dreams” and “learning to respect yourself” can happen amongst pimps and ho’s and loose-women and burnt-out, backwards-thinking bluesmen then it’s possible for anyone. His films are nowhere near as groundbreaking or exploitive as both as his champions and detractors claim them to be (as one of the former, I disagree with claims that Hustle is overtly misogynist, but I’m certainly sympathetic towards those who feel that way). You’d probably do well to adjust your expectations for his films in the future or I see you being frustrated repeatedly.

Matt Zoller Seitz said...

Son of a bitch. I gotta see this movie first thing tomorrow so I can get a piece of this comments thread. I feel like I'm sitting in the dugout without a glove.

Steven Boone said...

Or chained to a radiator.

Ryland Walker Knight said...

I, too, want to see this, uh, thing ASAP but too much school stands in the way. (Love the review proper, btw, Steve.) Maybe by the end of the week I can get around to seeing that close up of Christina Ricci's panties all big and beautiful up on the silver screen. Yet, I worry, rightly I'm sure, what this movie will do to me.

Annie Frisbie said...

btw, I did like your review, Steven, even though I disagreed with it :)

Annie Frisbie said...

Why is a bait-and-switch hypocritical? That's the genre revisionism game--use a common form to disguise the fact that a serious point is being made. Brewer sets up the audience expectation that we're going to see Laz frack Rae senseless. He plays with that expectation through imagery that's sexually charged, thereby implicating us in all the wrong that's been done to Rae her whole life.

You're dressing it up by saying that you think that Laz and Rae should have sex because they're equals. Well, that's not the exploitation movie story, either? If Brewer played this movie straight, we'd see Laz subjugate Rae once and for all--f all the free will out of her till all she wants is him, all the time, forever. That's the grindhouse version of this movie.

Brewer has chosen to tell this story in the only way that honors Rae's humanity. That's what makes this movie great, not hypocritical. The Flannery O'Connor quote I chose as much describes Laz's treatment of Rae as it does Brewer's treatment of the audience.

Armond White's analysis is out of date for anyone who's been watching TV in the last few years. Black men and white women get together all the time. All the time, and nobody cares anymore. Watch Dr. Phil, or MTV's Next, or Flavor of Love, or Bridezillas--yes, these are not high culture examples, but in the popular imagination the taboo against interracial relationships has been shattered. You watch any amount of reality TV and you will see mixed race couples everywhere. You see the children of mixed race couples everywhere, too, from America's Next Top model winners to My Super Sweet Sixteen and more.

Take slightly better TV. Battlestar Galactica has 2 interracial marriages. The first 2 sexual couplings on Lost were between Sayid & that dead white chick, and between Sawyer and Ana Lucia.

Now pay attention to young women. It's all sexual. They dress like strippers and make out with each other not because they're gay but because it turns men on. They think they're empowered, but they're enslaved by men as though feminism never happened. (Ariel Levy's Female Chauvinist Pigs is a must-read on this topic.) To see a sexually potent man (and I defy you to see Laz as impotent) reject this dehumanizing, self-destructive posturing is more radical than any sex scene.

Ultimately, sex onscreen doesn't have the power to be anything more than just sex. It can't communicate love. It's too powerful, too excessive, too visually stimulating. Sex onscreen always leaves the story behind.

I am no prude. But our visual culture is harmful to women. The other weekend, I woke up super early and ended up coming across the episode of the Bratz cartoon. The Bratz characters were in a car, whizzing past a building that had a pair of giant lips painted on it. One Brat said, "That pink torpedo is coming right towards us!" Cut to the lips, with an unmistakeable penis-shaped torpedo heading right towards them. It was a blatantly sexual image, on a show for CHILDREN. And we wonder why girls are confused, and unhappy, and anorexic, and cutting themselves.

I really felt that while Rae's nymphomania was a movie condition, the feelings underneath it were as deeply real as anything I've ever seen. I never see this character onscreen (though I see her on Intervention almost every week).

odienator said...

RWK: Maybe by the end of the week I can get around to seeing that close up of Christina Ricci's panties all big and beautiful up on the silver screen.

I'm glad they're not showing this movie in IMAX 3-D. The last thing I need is the guy behind me buttering my popcorn because he's into skeletons with tits.

I agree with the masses: the screenplay as written cannot support Sam and Christina screwing. We're led down that path, and the movie turns away not because it's terrified, but because it would be in a corner it can't get out of if this occurred. Where would it go from there?

I don't think that this could have turned into some black and white cookie love story. I agree about Brewer not being as committed to the S. Epatha character as he should have been, but pairing Rae and Lazarus off just to satisfy the baser instincts of the audience this film is falsely enticing would have done S. Epatha, and characters like her, an even graver disservice. Sam and Christina bumpin' uglies is sloppy college kid masturbatory fantasy bullshit; Sam and S. Epatha is exactly what the exploitation crowd doesn't want to see, which is why Brewer suckers you. It's punishment for your sins.

Blame Brewer if you must for this bait and switch construction, but this is the same shit he pulled in Hustle and Flow. I liked that movie because I found the characters intriguing despite their questionable quirks and characteristics. I feel the same way about this movie too. Brewer's films are summed up by yours truly thusly: Come for the tittilation, stay for the CapraCorn.

Steven Boone said...

I just read Armond White's review and he makes some points similar to mine about Brewer's warped view of the South. And the Bojangles thing. He also mentions the shameful pivotal country blues number ("Stagolee"), which sounds like uncensored Three 6 Mafia with its f-words and "niggas." I never heard such language in any of my uncle's country blues collections.

Y'all find the idea of a Laz/Rae love affair offensive? Howbout Brewer's unintentionally absurd dry-hump juke joint orgy that initiates Ricci into the world of "hot-natured blacks" (to paraphrase a '50s slave movie--can't remember the title)? The only redeeming slice of realism in that scene is the look of genuine affection that passes between Laz and Rae.

Brewer reminds me of that white guy who comes up to me on the train, a little tipsy, speculating loudly about the size of my manhood/how the "bitches must love it" etc. I run into some version of this guy probably once a year. Brewer is James Toback breathing down Jim Brown's and Mike Tyson's necks in White Negro admiration/envy. This tendency swamps his Robert Duvallish curiosity about downsouth everyday people to the degree that not one of Lazarus's black neighbors would seem out of place in either Gone With the Wind or Crackheads Gone Wild.

I think y'all are doing a lot of Brewer's conceptual heavy lifting for him. And you're also attributing to me some shallow assertions I didn't make. Annie, Odie: I don't propose this coupling for the delectation of race-fetishizing horndogs but because it seems the path to something truly daring, subversive and eye-opening for the multiplex/arthouse audience: True love that rages beyond all borders in this resolutely, suicidally repressive/prurient, violent/security-obsessed, cynical/superstitious American landscape. Segregation, racism, class warfare and dehumanizing mercenary capitalism ain't gone nowhere. BSM ultimately does nothing to expose their machinations. And it was all geared up to do just that.

This is not about Sam J putting his peepee in Christina's coochee. It's about, really, whether this country will ever grow up.

Suggested viewing: In the Realm of the Senses, Crash (Cronenberg), Battle in Heaven, The Lovers on the Bridge, Shabondama Elegy, The Pornographers, Peeping Tom...

Steven Boone said...

And, again: I don't propose that this operatic "true love" scenario would be prudent, sane or sustainable in the real world, just that it would be worth exploring in all its gory detail in a film as initially dreamlike as BSM. I'm envisioning some ripe artistic fruit.

The Rae abuse/Daddy storyline has been handled with greater clarity, complexity and empathy by David Lynch (Twin Peaks), Polanski (!) (Repulsion) and all over the place.

The big fish for BSM was the problem of the color/class/generational divide.

Annie Frisbie said...

You've got men coming up to you on trains? Me too! I'm a wide-hipped woman, and can't walk down the streets of NYC without getting catcalled. I've had some filthy things whispered in my ear in the broad daylight by men who don't know me. And, like you, I don't take it as a compliment.

Annie Frisbie said...

Oh, and suggested viewing:

Under the Skin
Morvern Callar
Red Road

and a little movie called Speak that I happen to be personally fond of.

Steven Boone said...

Morvern Callar is an amazing film, one of my favorites. Maybe if Brewer showed as much of a personal stake in his elaborate fictions as Ramsay does in Morvern (w/a fidelity to one person's subjective experience that leapfrogs Repulsion and Woman in the Dunes)... I'd trust him a lil more.

Lately, I'm starting to think he's as detached from his busy canvases as Spike Lee. With both of these guys I have trouble detecting a real personal stance, just the compulsion to stir shit up and come off deep.

Annie Frisbie said...

"With both of these guys I have trouble detecting a real personal stance, just the compulsion to stir shit up and come off deep."

I think I agree with you here. In all honesty, one reaction I had after seeing BSM for the 1st time was, "Is he just trying answer H&F's critics that he's a misgynist pig?" I am not 100% certain that what I'm seeing and responding to in the film comes from Brewer's heart. Time will tell for me--he's 1-1 in my book.

Ryland Walker Knight said...

"Morvern Callar is an amazing film, one of my favorites. ...a fidelity to one person's subjective experience that leapfrogs Repulsion and Woman in the Dunes"

I agree MC is deadly but you really dig it more than WITD? I wouldn't have ever thought to compare them, honestly. But I guess it makes sense since they're both about what's at stake in identification. (Still haven't seen the uber hot "skeleton with tits" yet.)