By Keith Uhlich
—Reflection of an old Polish folk tale—
Reflections and rhymes abound in David Lynch's INLAND EMPIRE. Consider its first image: the light of a film projector glaring (and blaring) outwards. For a brief moment, just before the beam angles sideways to illuminate the all-caps title card, the very screen we are watching is a perfectly aligned mirror—fact projecting fiction, fiction projecting fact. The extra-textual meaning is clear: this is Lynch’s first feature on Digital Video (shot entirely on the Sony PD-150 consumer camera) and so we must adjust our expectations accordingly. Fact the first: INLAND EMPIRE, with its muddy, grain-laden textures and sensuously bleeding hues, does not, as some have said, look ugly; it looks like it was shot on a camcorder, which is a crucial and necessary distinction. Fact the second, simply put: Lynch’s previous film, Mulholland Drive, was about a failed actress; INLAND EMPIRE is about a successful one. And even that's too much of a reduction, a near-futile attempt at codification, which might very well inspire the writer/director to crinkle his nose and proffer, as he did with maximum sincerity to an explanation-obsessed audience member at a recent New York Film Festival press conference, that "the words coming out of your mouth are very beautiful."
"You know what whores do?" asks a Polish john of his trick at the beginning of INLAND EMPIRE. "Yes. They fuck," she replies from behind the pixelated digital blur that briefly obscures her face. It's the performer’s dilemma in a twisted nutshell: does she go through the anonymous motions or rise above her profession's mechanistic particulars? In this case, she sits down to watch a movie, one that, as Lynch's puzzle-box of a narrative unfolds, will inextricably intersect with her own story. Lynch cuts back to the Polish prostitute's tear-stained and beatific visage throughout INLAND EMPIRE, and it’s somehow appropriate that I can't locate any information on the actress who plays the role. She's an audience conduit who works best, at least initially, as an anonymous and distanced specter. There's something profound, for example, in the way she weeps while watching a zombified sitcom starring monotoned, man-sized rabbits. Despite the images' seemingly antithetical intents and executions, there is a concomitant sense that fantasy and reality are intertwined in singular purpose—that the various inhabitants of these worlds (real? unreal?) are waiting for an as yet unseen liberator who will release them from their nightmarish limbo.
And so we quite literally follow the rabbits ("What time is it?" one of them pointedly asks) to INLAND EMPIRE's Alice, Nikki Grace (Laura Dern). Lynch stalwart Grace Zabriskie, playing a threatening spirit-world/real-world hybrid called Neighbor, knocks at Nikki's gilded door one morning to inform her that she’s received a coveted role in INLAND EMPIRE's film-within, On High in Blue Tomorrows. What to say about this overheated, down-in-the-Bayou melodrama—to co-star hot property Devon Berk (Justin Theroux), to be directed by Brit expat Kingsley Stewart (Jeremy Irons)—except that it is cursed. As Kingsley explains to his stars, On High is an unofficial remake of a Polish film that was never finished because its two leads were murdered. He none-too-convincingly brushes off any portentous parallels, though the shifty-eyed silences and frequent non-sequiturs of his elderly assistant Freddie Howard (Harry Dean Stanton) warn ominously enough of the discombobulating intrusions to come.When one of On High's rehearsals is interrupted by a shadowy, unseen figure, Nikki's world begins to split. But Lynch is not merely repeating the depths-of-despair tragedy of Mulholland Drive. If INLAND EMPIRE has a central theme, it is this: the recesses we visit in order to play the parts that we play. At its (gloriously optimistic) heart, the film is a detailed analysis of Nikki's creative process, of her struggle towards that transcendent point where her art, to slightly paraphrase E.M. Forster's oft-quoted insistence, only connects. The particulars of Nikki's everyday struggles (which here touch on both emotionally and politically charged issues of infidelity and isolation) are merely a means to an eventual end, though she can only go so far on her own.
As in Mulholland Drive, Lynch illustrates the ever-burgeoning divide in Nikki's psyche by invoking the spirits of cinema past. Early on, Nikki (embodying her On High alter-ego, Susan Blue) is lost in a pastel-colored realm of rubes n' rednecks where a gaggle of narcotized, musically-inclined prostitutes are lorded over by a demonic, barely-seen entity named Mr. Crimp. One night, a ghostly feminine figure appears to Nikki/Susan over the image of a scratchy record player (playing, I like to think, one of the fragile accompaniments to an Edison Studios picture show) and offers up the key to INLAND EMPIRE's unhinged wonderland. (The specter's astounding pure cinema metaphor, which I won't dare spoil, is comparable in its complexity to Trintignant’s Plato’s Cave illuminata in Bertolucci's The Conformist.) Spirits and entities are prominent in Lynch's work, yet where Mulholland Drive's Club Silencio impresario called Betty (Naomi Watts) and Rita's (Laura Harring) attention to cinema's elemental breakdown ("There is no band, and yet, we hear a band."), INLAND EMPIRE's gramophone phantom beckons Nikki to look beyond the divide—to allow the medium and its methods to completely absorb her; to allow her preconceptions and prejudices to fall entirely away.
"I'm a whore," Nikki says hesitantly when she suddenly appears, with no explanation, on a nighttime Hollywood boulevard. And after a considered pause, she lets mockingly loose: "I'm AFRRRAAAAIIIIIIDDDDD!!!!" (I must here take a moment to commend the brilliant Laura Dern, whose entirely cohesive and deeply affecting performance is matched only by the perverse genius of her facial contortions.) To the thrumming/thudding accompaniment of Beck's "Black Tambourine" (one of INLAND EMPIRE's many masterful music cues) and pursued by a soon-to-be screwdriver-wielding Julia Ormond (best thing this former It-girl's ever done), Nikki makes her way towards a back-alley club where a confessor awaits in the red-curtained rafters. Nikki's monologue to this bespectacled Mock Turtle psychologist—sprinkled dissociatively throughout the film—is an increasingly lurid admission of false hopes and dashed dreams, of abuse given and revenge taken. It is the sequence out of which INLAND EMPIRE grew and it is the focal point for all the incidents that precede and follow. Appropriate, then, that it is replayed for Nikki at a most crucial point, almost immediately after an elaborate "death scene" (during which two homeless women converse, often via subtitles, about a supposedly Pomona-situated Nirvana) that appears to signal the nightmare's end.
Lynch's dedication to and practice of Transcendental Meditation inform the remarkable beauties of INLAND EMPIRE's final movement, which is not so much a descent into the void as it is a resurgence and reclamation of a particular kind of holy land—Mulholland Drive's despondent last-act plunge into Jungian viscera reconstituted and refocused through a hopeful DV prism. There's a moment in this section, my favorite in the film, where Lynch returns to the face of Grace Zabriskie's Neighbor and, before our juandiced eyes, this formerly intimidating and ugly figure (who ominously intones the quotation at the head of this review) becomes suddenly beautiful and ethereal. Moreso than Dern’s final close-up (a stunner in its own right) I think the answers to the film's many mysteries, for those who need them, are contained in Zabriskie's sideways glance and virtuous smile. All else, per INLAND EMPIRE's Nina Simone-scored, end credits exhortation, is not Silencio, but Sweet. Strange what love does._____________________________________________________
Keith Uhlich is managing editor of The House Next Door, a staff critic for Slant Magazine, and a contributor to a variety of print and online publications.
23 comments:
Sigh -- I so want to see this, but who knows if or when it will ever come near me, though I love the Entertainment Weekly image of Lynch driving around the country, showing it out of the back of his car. I wonder if I can personally invite him to drop by my house...
You never know. He might not only accept your invitation, but bring a dwarf and a couple of rabbits.
I haven't seen this movie yet -- I'm hoping to get to it soon -- but I wanted to point readers to this piece, which I found quite rewarding.
Fact the first: INLAND EMPIRE, with its muddy, grain-laden textures and sensuously bleeding hues, does not, as some have said, look ugly; it looks like it was shot on a camcorder, which is a crucial and necessary distinction.
I think you're a little fuzzy on the meaning of the word "fact," Keith.
Only playfully so, Mike. Something of a gauntlet throw-down, but--at heart--to each their own. :-)
Fact: When I was in the 6th grade I was a finalist in our school spelling bee. It was me against Raj Patel. I misspelled, in front of the entire school, the word "failure".
Okay, so, I stole that. So, like, it's not really a "fact."
I'm such a failure.
The claim that it doesn't look ugly is factual enough for me. Because it doesn't.
I know nothing about transcendental meditation except that it sounds sort of silly, but there's something about the word 'transcendental' that seems at odds with everything that was happening in the movie. Who coined the term? Does anyone know?
There's this:
http://skepdic.com/tm.html
But then, they hate everything, and I don't know how accurate any of it is.
And thanks for the minor shout-out -- this is a fantastic blog.
Upon seeing Inland Empire, I was awestruck by the cinematography, and I'm already tired of critical complaints of muddiness and Lynch's use of digital. I agree with you completely on that count. You'll notice that the picture quality was not consistent throughout, and was NOT obtrusive or grainy except where it needed to be. Take, for example, the scene in which the background of the original Polish film was revealed. It was shot rather conventionally, with typical medium shots and nice resolution.
It is in your interpretation that my opinion differs from yours.
I think, in terms of "reality" and what "really happened," Dern's character did not exist. The majority of the film was the dream of the woman who greets her husband and child in the suburban home where we see Dern speaking with the Debt Collector.
Lynch provided us with a scene containing the most major hint of this (as he did in Club Silencio). Someone says to Dern: When you wake up, you will be surrounded by loved ones (or friends, or something of that effect). The only scene in the film depicting anything close to this was that very scene. The woman wakes up frightened, and is comforted by the presence of her husband and son. Coincidence? Not in a Lynch film. Interpretations abound about her dream imagery, but I tend to think it has to do with a history of prostitution, as in the common interpretation of Arquette's character in Lost Highway.
The Prostitutes following Dern were fragmented aspects of Dern's psyche. Consider the scene where Dern is apparently mourning a lost relationship. The prostitutes don't just commiserate; they are active mourners, their words chosen very carefully and never specifically in third person.
The Rabbits, which I absolutely loved, appeared to be either allegorical representations of Hollywood or representations of the main characters (defined as the most repeated characters). Empire would not be a proper Lynch movie without a blatant "Fuck you" to Hollywood and the studio system. Just my opinion on all this, and I'm really looking forward to hearing other interpretations.
Incidentally, I chatted with Justin Theroux for a bit and got some trivia you might be interested in on Lynch's now infamous LA appearance with a cow and a sign saying "Without cows, there would be no milk in the Inland Empire." I walked up to Justin and just said those words, he laughed and said "David told me that it's part of his campaign to get Laura an Oscar. I asked him about the cow and he said 'Remember all the cheese I ate during the shooting of the movie?'" Justin said he did and Lynch said that was the explanation. Clearly that which makes a natural connection in the mind of David Lynch is somewhat disparate in terms of logic...and it makes for some great movies.
"It is in your interpretation that my opinion differs from your."
Which is part of what makes Lynch so great. :-)
Thanks for writing, Mick.
Mick, I came around to your point of view on the image quality on second viewing. Lynch is using the cheap cameras like, I dunno, watercolors? Here some thoughts on seeing Inland Empire a second time.
Uh, watercolors? I think it's the boldest use of a new media since the use of sound or color in film. Lynch uses video to create an entirely new aesthetic of how we see and dream.
People who disdain the "quality" are simple minded, the same types that would disdain artists like Picasso or Twombly.
Lynch's use of video has tremendous political implications; he is showing that cinema (NOT film of movies) is something that can and should be created by those who are out of the reach of the huge investments needed to create feature length films. There has been pseudo-utopian buzz around the accessibility of this new media since it arrived, and yet there have been few artist who have made real statements with it.
He is also bringing up supercomplicated questions of how we need or want to see things on a screen. The obsession with "resolution" and clarity in film has created a void of imagination and courage in filmmaking, and of course it takes someone like Lynch to reinvent cinema through the use of consumer grade media. I have met far too many art students and film people who are ready to sacrifice image and idea over "the look" of a film. It's disgusting that most filmmakers are so intimidated by commercial concerns that they are frozen outside of their own imaginations. They never can travel inwards (into their own "inland empire") because they are so concerned with making film look like "reality".
I'm sure Lynch's use of the cheap camera was not politically motivated. Or was it?
I still take "cheese is made from milk" to refer to how Dern pretty much made the film.
Females make milk, and then you can make cheese, and without cheese there would be no INLAND EMPIRE.
Lynch has given women more opportunities and complexity on the screen than any other director. The cow appearance in LA and the offhand "i ate a lot of cheese during the shoot" explanation is just more of how Lynch can couch superb symbolic gymnastics of utter "seriousness" in funny, campy, pop-surrealist images.
Anonymous, what I meant by "watercolors" was that the DV isn't a question of price, that it's a different medium with different (blurrier) results, with its own aesthetic properties. It's a choice. You're welcome to all the superlatives about just how bold it is; I was simply restating Keith's original "crucial and necessary distinction."
Here's what Lynch says about it in his upcoming book Catching the Big Fish, under the heading of "DV Quality":
The DV camera I currently use is a Sony PD-150, which is a lower quality than HD. And I /love/ this lower quality. I love the small cameras.
The quality reminds me of the films of the 1930s. In the early days, the emulsion wasn't so good, so there was less information on the screen. The Sony PD result is a bit like that; it's nowhere near hi-fef. And sometimes, in a frame, if there's some question about what you're seeing, or some dark corner, the mind can go dreaming. If everything is crystal clear in that frame, that's what it is -- that's /all/ it is.
And high-def, unfortunately, is so crystal clear. I saw a piece of film on the screen in my mixing room shot in high-def; it was some kind of science fiction. And in the background I could see wood screws in what was supposed to be a metal console. It's going to be far more difficult to build sets for high-def film.
Here's a link to Lynch's recent QA at the Brattle Theater in Cambridge:
http://www.bradleysalmanac.com/2006/12/mp3-david-lynch-qa.htm
My ears may be on the fritz, but I believe Dern's dialogue on Hollywood Blvd. is "I'm a whore... Where am I? I'm AFRAID!"
Chris-
Mea culpa and many thanks, you are correct. Just returned from seeing the film a fifth time and Dern does indeed say "I'm afraid!" in the scene I mention. It's a rhyme with something the Polish prostitute says at the beginning of the film. How could I have missed?!! Well, it's Lynch, so anything's possible.
I've amended in the review.
Five times? You're hardcore, Keith. My third time almost killed me, but I posted about it anyway--this time from a TM perspective.
it’s somehow appropriate that I can't locate any information on the actress who plays the role.
According to Scott Foundas:
"Karolina Gruszka, billed in the credits as 'Lost Girl'"
Thanks Virgil. At the time I wrote the review the cast list (press notes and IMDB both) didn't specify who played "The Lost Girl". IMDB's since been updated and Karolina is listed. Will keep as is to "mark the moment." :-)
Muckster: Yeah, I'm hardcore. Raring for a sixth time. Wish it was playing where I am in Florida at the moment.
Keith: I've been parsing the web avidly for critical material on INLAND EMPIRE, and your review is the best I've come across - great job!
Just saw a midnight showing of this at the Music Box in Chicago; Lynch was in attendance to introduce; to see him stand on the proscenium under spotlight in front of a bright red velvet curtain was extremely...well...Lynchian.
Quote from Mick, below: "The majority of the film was the dream of the woman who greets her husband and child in the suburban home where we see Dern speaking with the Debt Collector."
^Interesting - I think of her more as an embodiment of the maternal/protective element of the Film's larger pschye, one in conflict with the depravity of the Sue/hooker/castrator character and, to a lesser degree, with Nikki's libidinous Chorus. But, then, these impressions are after just one viewing.
Again, great flick, great review!
who the hell wrote that song "starnge what love does"? I need it!! Now!!
Karolina Gruszka plays the "lost girl". Many wonderful polish actors plays in the movie, f.e. Leon Niemczyk who unfortunately died in the end of 2006 in the age of 83, in his life he played over 400 movie roles.
In majority b&w parts of the movie, those with polish language, were filmed in old districts of polish industrial city Lodz.
'strange what love does' is called 'ghost of love' and it was written and sung by......David Lynch!
Post a Comment