By Ryland Walker Knight
For all the expansion to be enjoyed in Pedro Almodóvar’s recent string of excellent films, his newest, Volver, is his narrowest effort since 1995’s rare misfire, The Flower of My Secret. After laboring with, and firmly executing, Bad Education’s labyrinthine noir (its convolutions span three decades of lies and betrayals and trannies and heroin) it’s fitting that Almodovar would scale down to a story that, at bottom, only needs five principal sets and five principal characters. Even his broadened, widescreen palate is compressed within the frame: certain close-ups of his luminous cast are shot with such long lenses that a minor movement by the actress fuzzies up her ears or her perfectly mangled coif like a distant spotlight straining to keep a stage actor lit. This technique reflects the precision one has come to expect, and take for granted, in each new joy Almodóvar gifts us.
This is a story of returns, just as the title tells us, but its chief subject is feminine (and provincial) rites, rituals and customs. Almodóvar’s allegiances have never been in doubt, and this is as bald a love letter as the nakedly titled All About My Mother. Yet Volver has no time for men, even if they’re trying to be women like the earlier film’s transvestite-hooker, Agrado. From the hilarious and poignant opening tracking shot across a wind-wrecked cemetery full of old maids tending and tidying faithful headstones, the screen is congested with women.
At the center is Penélope Cruz, delivering a stunning, full-bodied and nuanced performance, able to swoon teary-eyed on a dime or dig in and get dirty if need be, as the fiery Raimunda. Many have used Michael Curtiz’s Mildred Pierce heroine as a shorthand comparison but it’s only apt in a typical Almodóvar fashion: he takes an archetypal character from a film he adores and throws it into his personal blender to twist the character into the form that suits his story best. Raimunda is Mildred as much as Ignacio-Angel from Bad Education is Madeline-Judy from Vertigo.
Raimunda and her daughter Paula (Yohana Cobo is one to watch) find themselves without husband and father Paco (Antonio de la Torre, effectively vulgar in his two brief scenes) after an ugly incident lands a steak knife in his stomach. Naturally, they clean the murder up and, to save time, store him in deep freeze next door at a neighbor’s newly-abandoned restaurant. This prevents the girls from accompanying Raimunda’s sister, Sole (Lola Dueñas mouses her way to a rich epiphany), back home to La Mancha for the Aunt Paula’s wake (Chus Lampreave returns to Almodóvar in fine form, sporting raccoon gramma glasses and her singularly aloof comic timing), whom all three just visited at the film’s opening.
Back in La Mancha, Sole mourns with neighbor Augustina (Blanca Portillo, heartbroken and disintegrating), who kept a close eye on her aged neighbor. Augustina tells a crowded room of ladies (each eager to kiss the relative in a hilarious running gag) about the voice she heard at her door the night prior, alerting her to Aunt Paula’s death. This yields suspicion and intrigue but takes Sole into the kitchen to tell her to whom the voice belonged: Sole and Raimunda’s years-dead mother, Irene, played with fearless pluck by a former muse of Almodóvar, the great Carmen Maura.
This not so brief first act-outline might cast a dour image in the mind, but in Pedro’s hands, nothing could be further from the truth. Volver, despite its fear of (and a tendency to dwell on) death, is alive with color, music, ebullient smiles, an honest plea for community, fart jokes and ripe cleavage.
Almodovar said it first: “Penélope is at the height of her beauty. It's a cliché but in her case it's true. (Those eyes, her neck, her shoulders, her breasts!! Penélope has got one of the most spectacular cleavages in world cinema).” Then he filmed it. And I love it. There’s a shot early on, filmed from the ceiling, of Cruz’s Raimunda washing dishes that looks straight down her already low-cut shirt. This typifies Pedro’s adoration but, as always, reveals something else besides the voluptuous gift on the right half of the screen. After washing one dish, Raimunda picks up a steak knife and holds it phallus-style away from her stomach, pointing to the left of the screen. In this ten second cut Pedro shows off his star’s lusty vivacity and aligns himself with her at the same time, showing his affinity for both the actress he’s employed and the character he’s created.
Almodovar also said this film is entirely about (& altogether inspired by) his mother and in some respects yet more autobiographical than Bad Education’s flashbacks. The riverbed town in this film is his childhood town where the inhabitants still believe in the rebirth-ressurection-return of dead loved ones. As Almodóvar has made himself one with Raimunda (by way of steak knife), we can see in her character the apologies he still feels he owes his mother and a plea for reprieve from the ugliness of adolescence underneath the obvious longing for her presence. In the same confessional essay, Almodovar writes, “I have filled a vacuum, I have said goodbye to something (my youth?) to which I had not yet said goodbye and needed to, I don't know. There is nothing paranormal in all this. My mother hasn't appeared to me, although, as I said, I felt her presence closer than ever.”
What grounds these surreal elements, and keeps them from blowing up into telenovela-melodrama camp, is Almodóvar’s sure handed storytelling. While the early pictures in his career embraced a camp of the abject stance, over the 15 features he made leading up to Volver, his writing skills have only improved, project after project, to this new plateau. Prone to genre-bending from the beginning, with a gonzo comic sensibility flush with cum jokes and heavy breathing, his cinema has indeed matured into a layered paella that yields serving after serving of perfected yet playful construction. By whittling down his ingredients to the essentials, this film is rendered more intimate and heartfelt, each movement timed and calculated yet wholly natural. Volver isn’t as explosively inspired as his last three pictures (or as subversive in content, despite its ghost story shadows and cold blooded murder) yet its skill is undeniable.
___________________________________________________
House Next Door contributor Ryland Walker Knight is the infrequent publisher of the blog Vinyl Is Heavy.
The voluptuous precision of Volver
Thursday, November 23, 2006
The voluptuous precision of Volver
Labels:
Ryland Walker Knight
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Did you notice how "Volver" is actually based on "The Flower OF My Secret"?
In that film, the romance writer character Leo writes a "dark" story that her publishers hate about a woman who covers up a murder her daughter commited and hides the body in the freezer of her neighbors' restaurant.
It seems Almodovar gets inspiration from himself. He did this also on "All About My Mother", the main character MAnuela first appeared as the organ transplant coordinator from "The Flower Of My secret". Also noting, "Bad Education" was based on the Carmen Maura character from 1986's "Law OF Desire".
I mentioned the Flower of My Secret connection to Almodóvar when I interviewed him for Frontiers, and while he acknowledged that he borrows from himself, he seemed surprised at just how much he had borrowed in that instance.
Volver just knocks me out for so many reasons, one of them being that it's his most vividly Spanish movie. I know those old ladies, I know those courtyards. It's too bad that so many straight male critics have decided that it's "lesser" Pedro because it doesn't beat you over the head with style and -- heavens forbid! -- it's 100% about women.
"Also noting, 'Bad Education' was based on the Carmen Maura character from 1986's 'Law OF Desire'."
That's one of my biggest blind spots as a film fan, I'd have to say. SO...I can't take a tact on that either way other than maybe the Carmen Maura character from LAW is another riff on Madeline-Judy... just a guess.
"It's too bad that so many straight male critics have decided that it's "lesser" Pedro because it doesn't beat you over the head with style and -- heavens forbid! -- it's 100% about women."
No doubt. It's one of my favorite movies of the year. I was happy to watch an entirely feminine movie after a year of intensely sad/nihilistic male movies, including the newest Bond. I'm no big feminist or anything but it was a thrill (and hilarious) to see the men as plot devices for once.
Was The Flower of My Secret a misfire? Huh. I quite enjoyed it--didn't like it as much as Talk to Her or All About My Mother, but thought it was a fine film nonetheless.
I wish I remembered it more so I could explain better ... shall have to watch it again.
Was 'The Flower of My Secret' a misfire?
I thought so.
Ry, thanks for motivating me to see this flick. It is the greatest Almodovar film I have yet seen. Perfect, no lazy resting upon wild auteur flourishes like in Bad Education. Here he assimilates influences from the masters (Hitch, Clouzot, a nod to Visconti's Bellisima) fluidly, purely in the service of his airtight story.
And this is the ONLY Almodovar that made me cry. And not just because of that overhead shot of Penelope Cruz's glories.
The intense but soft, stonewashed light in this film (always thrown from the side or bounced from the tile floor) expresses astonishment and delight at everything Almodovar chooses to fill the screen with.
This is as stylized as movies get, but critics and audiences used to hyperbolic, cutty expressions of "style" (the same ones who think Campion's An Angel at My Table is less stylized than her Sweetie or the Piano) won't see it. This movie seduces as much with it's camera as with the seamless performances.
Post a Comment