Wednesday, November 08, 2006

Links for the Day (November 8th, 2006)

1. "Spreading Santorum": As it is now little more than a fond reminder of things that were... once more for the road. (With something of a sobering rejoinder.)

["Bob Casey Jr is no Rick Santorum, but on many social measures he's more red than blue. He's pro-life, and supports efforts to overturn Roe v Wade. He opposes gay marriage, and is against giving mandatory equal rights to same-sex domestic couples. He was for the war in Iraq, though he says he now considers it a mistake, and is opposed to the withdrawal of US troops. He opposes gun control, supports the death penalty, and backed the appointment of John Roberts and Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court."]

***

2. "It's Time": Andrew Sullivan says it's party time. (Or is it?)

["The House of Representatives has now become a key check on an out-of-control executive. It reflects a big shift in the minds and souls of Americans. The Senate is still unclear - but the Dems have made gains, clearly. The founders knew what they were doing. The country wants to go back to the center, to have a sane, reality-based debate about what to do in Iraq, how to rescue the looming fiscal catastrophe, and how to defeat Islamo-fascism and how to detain and interrogate terror suspects. So we have a re-balancing. I think we know enough now for this:"]

***

3. "Slave to Beauty": David Thomson writes on Jacques Rivette for The Guardian.

["It is just that Rivette thinks the cinema runs the risk of turning vulgar and foolish if it starts to stress the visual over everything else. The visual is a given; it is the norm; it is the world, or its engine - and Rivette, without reservation, loves that world even when it frightens him. I doubt he has ever composed a shot without seeking both grace and an austere absence of all those signs that say: "Here is grace." Just look at Céline and Julie Go Boating, which, apart from anything else, is one of the most inspiring films about the way Paris looks in the summer, and about the illusion that we can catch its fragrance. (You can find the same compositional severity, the fierce effort to restrain beauty, in Bresson and Buñuel.)"]

***

4. "Stromboli": John Flauss analyzes one of Roberto Rossellini's greatest films.

["Rossellini directed Stromboli and other films of this period as though theatrical drama had never existed. His camera covers the action with few cuts or tight framings while the interaction between characters may seem 'superficial', lacking the familiar layers of development. Essentially he tells his story without expression: dialogue does not explore its subject matter, actors don't 'act' so much as they 'behave', images are not 'beautiful' pictures of their subjects (though sometimes the subject may be intrinsically beautiful: land, sea, a human face, etc)."]

***

5. "The Good Year Blimp": Robbiefreeling of Reverse Shot takes the trailer of Ridley Scott's latest to task.

["Surely if you’ve gone to see a non-talking-moose movie this year, you’ve been subjected to the trailer for Ridley Scott’s A Good Year. I just discovered that it’s actually being released next week…hell, that shit crept up on us like athlete’s foot. What this means for film culture, besides that another steaming pile of Ridley will be dropped on screens imminently, is that we will no longer be able to enjoy A Good Year’s three-minute Preview of Coming Attractions, which is so packed with every ludicrous cliché and hilariously streamlined textbook cut and musical cue that it becomes nearly self-reflexive in its predictable idiocy. There’s barely a difference between this and “Shining,” that masterpiece trailer parody that took the internet by storm last year by reconfiguring The Shining into a sappy Cameron Crowe-esque tale about “finding yourself…in the most unlikely of places.”"]
______________________________________________________
"Links for the Day": Each morning, the House editors post a series of weblinks that we think will spark discussion. Comments encouraged.

7 comments:

Robert Cashill said...

I think I saw the GOOD YEAR trailer once. It looked like the male response to that Diane-Lane-in-Tuscany movie that came out a couple of years ago. It struck me as no better, and no worse, than many other trailers, most of which are just plain indifferent.

And the film itself isn't bad. Crowe, Albert Finney, and Abbe Cornish (doomed to be connected more to the Reese Witherspoon breakup, I'm afraid, than to her work here and especially CANDY) are all fine and the production values are typically top-of-of-the-line Ridley Scott. I don't know why other critics seem to be dipping their pens in acid to write about it, when so much worse is out there to deserve their ire.

Steven Boone said...

I had to sit through that Good Year trailer twice, at two different flicks.

There's so much more horror and calamity in the world to be upset about instead of some stupid trailer.

And yet each time I viewed the promo for this flick I felt as hostile and violent as I do when listening to Wu Tang's Da Mystery of Chessboxin at full blast. Both urge me to commit felonies-- Chessboxin consciously, Good Year by its unconscious, unbearable lightness. (I said "lightness.")Chessboxin makes me smile; Good Year trailer makes me twitch.

The offense of the trailer isn't so much the touristy, showroomy wealth pornography. That's just the obscenity we live with every day now. The travesty is presenting for sale what looks like a film without a story, just rich folks being cute and clever. Fuck you, Ridley Scott.

Todd VanDerWerff said...

Rich folks being cute and clever?! Now THERE'S a movie.

I have yet to see the Good Year trailer somehow, though I seem to see the one for Stranger Than Fiction before every movie I see. It seems like it gives away too much about its Charlie-Kaufman-lite premise to make the movie worth viewing, though, of course, I have no idea if this is the case.

Tram said...

"I have yet to see the Good Year trailer somehow, though I seem to see the one for Stranger Than Fiction before every movie I see. It seems like it gives away too much about its Charlie-Kaufman-lite premise to make the movie worth viewing, though, of course, I have no idea if this is the case."

My school is sneak previewing Stranger Than Fiction tomorrow. I'm mainly gonna check it out to see if the hype about Zach Helm, playwright-cum-screenwriter-cum-Lucy Liu's ex, is warranted.

Ryland Walker Knight said...

I saw a 30-second spot somewhere on TV for A GOOD YEAR and it certainly lives up to its awful imdb plot summary. Why would these people find this a worthy project?

Robert, I think its middling subject matter and pointless aims are the wellspring for such venom. Mediocrity from talented people is sometimes more offensive than down and out horrid pictures that don't really purport to lay claim on anything resonant. But something like the SAW series, with all its moralizing is like the double whammy of idiocy.

If homie from ReverseShot hates Crowe so much, what about that shot of the high power hose shooting him across the bottom of the empty, caked with dead-leaves pool? That's a moment of glee, for sure. I for one kinda dig Crowe in spite of his public phone-throwing personality: as an actor, he's one of the better marquee names we've got. And to think of a reteam of VIRTUOSITY's leads in Scott's next picture is pretty sweet. The movie will more than likely be hairbrained and hackneyed but Denzel and Russell are a pretty good tandem. Crowe can out act Clive Owen any day--and I got a kick out of INSIDE MAN--so this could be a fruitful film for acting at least.

The real question is why does Denzel love working with the Scott brothers so much?

Ryland Walker Knight said...

Also, it's an easy target. Somehow, an easier target than SANTA CLAUSE 3, which we all know can't be worth much, even if there's a little part of us that wants to like Tim Allen (& a big part of us that loves Martin Short).

Peet said...

Believe me, A GOOD YEAR couldn't have asked for a more fitting trailer. The film itself is exactly that, only stretched out to feature length, and worse. I don't get negative so often, but that film is an abomination. I saw it at the Cinema Expo in Amsterdam and was inspired to write this open letter to Ridley Scott right after.