By Barry Maupin
Among hardcore Deadwood fans, a discussion of favorite characters could go back and forth for hours. When the debate shifts to assigning a least favorite character, though, the verdict comes down in a hurry: Alma Garret Ellsworth. While the other characters’ flaws and failures get treated with empathy and seriousness, Alma’s characterization usually hews to Farnum’s harsh summation: “A haughty cunt.” True, her biography doesn’t engender a rooting interest--she marries into New York high society, comes to Deadwood ostensibly seeking adventure among the unwashed, lays around her hotel room in ball gowns doing drugs the whole time, and, when her husband dies, takes up with the married sheriff. Meanwhile, her inherited gold claim turns into an unwitting bonanza. Her hostile reception among viewers, though, may ultimately be the result of her character’s many ambiguities. With Alma (Molly Parker) what looks like one thing often turns out to be another.
Alma’s getting high again after more than a year of sobriety, and the consequences show up at first in the tiniest of ways. On the morning of the opening of her new bank in the fourth episode of Season Three, her husband, Ellsworth (Jim Beaver), coyly produces the gift of an apple. “You don’t confuse me with Mrs. Bullock?” she grins, referring to the camp’s schoolteacher. Her ill-considered attempt at playfulness knocks the proud look off of Ellsworth’s face, as it slowly dawns on Alma that she has offered another reminder that “Mrs. Bullock” is who she wishes to be.
Later at the bank, Alma handles a deposit herself from Leon (Larry Cedar), the camp’s functioning junkie she has enlisted to score for her, in an expertly played scene that offers the first substantial clues that Alma is using. When she refers to his savings as “forward looking,” Leon replies, “Oh, I’m keen-eyed. Ahead and behind.” He stares at her earnestly, as if offering deep assurance that he can be trusted not to botch their mutual transactions. All the while, Alma maintains cool indifference to his familiar tone. Trixie (Paula Malcolmson), perhaps Deadwood’s shrewdest judge of intentions, watches the gamesmanship from across the bank with incipient suspicion.
Sheriff Bullock (Timothy Olyphant) bursts in with business of his own, and, though he need only sign his deposit, Alma asks Leon to wait while she attends to Bullock. Leon, for his part, makes a big show of waving and blowing on his deposit slip, as if the ink needs assistance to dry. Bullock leaves, and Leon looks pleased with himself, like together he and Alma fooled the sheriff. His conspiratorial buzz draws a look of contempt from Alma; they’re a junkie pair in cahoots, but she can’t see her reflection in low-class Leon.
That night, in what starts out as a Norman Rockwell portrait of domestic satisfaction, Alma gazes out the window while Ellsworth and Sofia play checkers by the soft glow of kerosene lamps. She keeps looking out the window and swallows nervously as Ellsworth recites a paean to her beauty and benevolence. When Leon appears out of the dark, skulking in the yard and signaling with his hat, Alma fashions a beatific grin for her family and softly announces, “I’ll take the air, just briefly.” Ellsworth, chin in hand and clueless, lovingly consents. As Alma exits their home, she looks back, knowing she got away with it this time.
Her addled behavior quickly becomes more pronounced. (By Alma's own assessment, one physical manifestation of her highness is a tendency toward overtly sexual body language:in Season One, she pretends to be high in front of Farnum for strategic reasons too complex to address here. When Farnum reports the meeting to Swearengen, he titters, “The dope made the widow randy.”) The next day--in Episode Five,"A Two-Headed Beast" -- Alma sits sumptuously stroking a plant on her desk at the bank while the newspaperman A.W. Merrick (Jeffrey Jones) attempts to interview her for an article about the bank opening. Alma trims the plant as she delivers a rhapsodic and self-serving monologue about how deposits at her bank can be made in confidence (Merrick, distracted by her flirtatious lolling, pens a puff piece on the bank in which he describes her as “serene and comely.”). After the interview, Alma leans back in her chair, inhales as if overcome by a heavenly odor and licks her lips, obviously high as hell. The reverie ends when she catches Trixie glaring at her; Alma sits forward and busies herself at her desk, contemplating just how much Trixie has figured out.
Trixie, vexed by this development, tries to unburden herself to Sol, referring to “the bank’s founder and president…of air-headed smugness and headlong plunges unawares into the fucking abyss.” Sol, concerned primarily with his carnal needs, doesn’t take her meaning. No matter: the others will find out in short order, either from Alma’s behavior or from Cy Tolliver (Powers Boothe), who strongarms Leon into divulging who he’s copping for on the suspicion that it’s Lila, one of his whores whose income has bottomed out.
Deadwood’s creator, David Milch, is himself a recovering addict of many stripes, and the cast is littered with incarnations of his past: junkies, drunks, degenerate gamblers, control freaks. For most of them, their affliction is judged as merely a part of them (“What is Steve the Drunk’s surname?” Alma asks while completing a loan) and accepted as such, like bad hair or a bum knee; Doc Cochran’s whiskey habit isn’t the subject of a whispering campaign. In Alma’s case, though, her history of drug use draws reproof from all corners of town. As Deadwood’s only expatriate from upper class society, she is held to a separate standard.
So what triggers Alma’s relapse? Certainly the taste of laudanum supplied by Doc Cochran to treat the pain from her illness and subsequent abortion plays a role, but to attribute it solely to that feels too pat. Alma seems genuinely committed at that stage to staying clean, and her claim that she threw away the leftover drugs from Doc is credible; after all, making such a symbolic public gesture is the easy part. One factor might be the humiliation dished out by Hearst when she tries to partner up their gold claims, which starkly reminds Alma that the only thing elevating her from the woman who arrived in camp a junkie was a lucky strike. Another take, one that seems counterintuitive on the surface, is that she is flush from her success with the opening of the bank; her renewed confidence allows her to drop her vigilance at a moment of vulnerability.
Or perhaps her true addiction is to being helpless, with a series of surrogates in the role of protector: Brom Garret, who she doesn’t love but marries to clear her family’s debts; Bullock, who stands between her and Swearengen’s play for her gold claim; and Ellsworth, the steady and capable superintendent of that claim. Now, closing in on independence with the successful opening of her bank, she’s returning to the lowest sort of helplessness at the very moment when she doesn’t need anyone.
Whatever the cause, Alma’s habit is escalating toward its plateau of the previous summer. On the night of Episode Five, she sits at her vanity and gulps laudanum (a liquid opiate she dilutes in water, the society method) with a shaky hand. After gathering herself, she moves to the bed and folds back the spread, perhaps hoping for a more graceful entry if her intentions pan out. Seeing her reflection in the mirror, she pinches her cheeks in a vain attempt to look less like a ghost. Unsatisfied, she nonetheless steels herself to do something she’s yet to attempt: engage Ellsworth romantically. This moment of premeditation is telling: she has to get higher than usual to have sex with Ellsworth, since (as his presence around town keeps reminding her) it’s Bullock she really wants. But she can’t waver now; junkie logic tells her a sexually placated husband is less likely to blanch upon discovery of her indiscretions. She listens outside the bathroom door as Ellsworth bathes, then asks, in a series of failed moves, whether he needs towels, hot water, or his back washed. Ellsworth is, in turn, startled, confused, and embarrassed by these advances coming from a woman he assumes has no interest in a sexual relationship with him. He leaps from the tub and hastily dresses to thwart the awkwardness. When he exits the bathroom, though, Alma is still there. She fixes his hair and strokes his beard, and now, face-to-face, her affection genuinely moves Ellsworth. She closes her eyes and moves in for a kiss, and when it ends Ellsworth watches her for his cue. What appears at first to be a look of blissful passion from Alma on closer inspection turns out to be plain old junkie nodding. He recoils from her second kiss, declares that he will arrange to retrieve his possessions later, and asks if she would like him to collect Sofia. Crestfallen by the sudden rebuke, Alma pulls herself together enough to hold claim to the one thing she’s done right, which is care for Sofia. When she asserts, “I’ll collect Sofia,” Ellsworth’s bitter comeback stings: “Don’t forget.”
Sunday, July 09, 2006
The society method: a portrait of Alma Garret Ellsworth
Labels:
Barry Maupin
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
35 comments:
Great analysis! I had thought maybe Alma was trying to steel herself with Ellsworth in the hopes that a true marital relationship might develop, despite her present distaste, and that she might be able to move past Bullock. But the "junkie logic" of a sexually placated husband being more tolerant of her habit has an elegant parsimony to it as an explanation. Did you also see her move the mirror so she wouldn't catch sight herself in the middle of the act itself.
As for attributing a reason for Alma's relapse, you completely forgot the fact that she lost the child of a man she loved, the only part of him that she had hoped to keep. For all her faults, I do believe that you judge her harshly: falling in love is no crime; seeking refuge in the loss of a lover and a child in the only way one knows how is understandable even if dastardly and hurtful to the others involved.
There is a certain air of Hester Prynne about Alma, for sure. She's held to a different standard, and her "failure" leads to a metaphorical branding. That she seeks solace in an opiate is entirely understandable. Where else is she gonna find it?
Despite my infatuation with Molly Parker, I still don't like Alma much, her snootiness and privileged condescension make me itch. But I do understand her, and that's a starting point towards empathy.
I must dissent and say that I think Alma is a great character. Though, I do not beleive there would be any dissension to Molly Parkers portrayal. I can not say exactly what I admire about Alma, and so it may be just derived from from Molly Parker.
Perhaps my esteem for Alma goes back to the first season. Alma, when Brom wanted to confront Swearingen over the claim, Alma asked him to take his walk first. I thought she cared for him then. After all it was only later, we learned their marriage was only for her father's debts. And learning that fact, only elevated Alma's counsel in my esteem. If she did not care for Brom at all, would she not have thrust the New York Dude into Swearingen's and Doritey's open arms?
it's kinda funny, actually, what with all the murderous characters in the show that the most hated (of the majors), while arguably no better than the rest of them, turns out to be the one with any sort of manners or sense of decorum (Merrick & Star excepted)
What some call "manners" may be to others a fanciful and affected way of separating oneself from the herd. You know, putting on airs, and all that. Alma often behaves quite decently, as you point out in the case of her deceased dandy of a hubby, for whom she clearly had very mixed feelings. But her bearing, her mien if you will, often hints at an airy snobbishness that I enjoy about as much as grit in my vaseline.
I guess that what it is with Alma is that rather than the ruthlessness of a brute like Hearst or Swearingen, we have the passive-aggressive whimpering of an aristocrat. While the actions of the former are shocking and horrifying, and a challenge to our private ethical codes, they make for excellent drama. The latter, not so much.
Still, I feel that I understand Alma pretty well, and believe that she (like pretty much every woman in Deadwood) has been cruelly treated by many in the camp, and that this has marked her as plainly as her scarlet-coloured dress.
Dan Jardine said... I guess that what it is with Alma is that rather than the ruthlessness of a brute like Hearst or Swearingen, we have the passive-aggressive whimpering of an aristocrat. While the actions of the former are shocking and horrifying, and a challenge to our private ethical codes, they make for excellent drama. The latter, not so much.
Would you prefer the show without Alma?
Anonymous: "As for attributing a reason for Alma's relapse, you completely forgot the fact that she lost the child of a man she loved..."
Excellent point. I knew I had blown it on that score when my wife made that exact remark about the relationship between the two events immediately after the episode. Thanks for adding an important dimension to the discussion.
I've always felt a great deal of sympathy for Alma, and I think that a scene that explains why is at the end of season two, before marrying Ellsworth, when she "speaks" to Brom. She says something along the lines of: "I feel my life is being lived for me, and soon it will be over and none of it will have been mine."
Maybe some found that scene a little too gooey and obvious, but it struck me as being quite sad, with Alma trying to connect a past she never wanted with a future she isn't sure she desires.
Alma's struggle is certainly similar to Hester Prynne's, and for that matter a good number of 19th century novels about women and society. The fact that Milch is able to do his Scarlet Letter thing in the same narrative universe as his Swearingens and Hearsts speaks to the show's remarkable breadth.
I've never understood the hate for Alma. Indeed, I didn't start following forums until the end of the second season, and until then had no idea she was a disliked character. So take as a starting pad for my viewpoint.
True, her biography doesn’t engender a rooting interest--she marries into New York high society, comes to Deadwood ostensibly seeking adventure among the unwashed, lays around her hotel room in ball gowns doing drugs the whole time, and, when her husband dies, takes up with the married sheriff. Meanwhile, her inherited gold claim turns into an unwitting bonanza.
That portion of a paragraph right there could be a lesson to all politicos in misinformation. Not one statement is outright wrong, but boy does it leave a lot out.
marries into New York high society - At the behest of her controlling and likely abusive (there was subtext of sexual impropriety there) father to clear his gambling debts.
comes to Deadwood ostensibly seeking adventure among the unwashed - This really refers to her arranged marriage husband. It was Alma who saw the folly in this and encouraged him to return to NY, even at a loss.
lays around her hotel room in ball gowns doing drugs the whole time - We don't know where her decent into addiction originated from, but we watched her deal with it, recover, and manipulate local powerbrokers while recovering.
when her husband dies, takes up with the married sheriff - falls in love with the sheriff whos absent wife is not his wife in a traditional sense at all, but the widow of his brother whom he has married to protect in a take on biblical law. The affairs forward momentum was halted when she found out about a wife, does not start again until these details are revealed.
Meanwhile, her inherited gold claim turns into an unwitting bonanza. - The claim that her husband died over, thinking he was scamed. If he had actually done his due dilligance, he would have found the gold himself and stayed alive. After killing him, the forces at play then tried to retrieve the claim the sold and killed over to get the gold back.
None of this means you have to like the character, but there is certainly more of interest to her than just a "haughty c**t."
Cheers!
James: Good points, but I feel I should point out that Barry's wording in that section is intentionally supposed to reflect the view of people who would censure Alma. He's not painting his own portrait of Alma, which turns out to be quite sympathetic; he's trying to show how the town sees her.
Matt: True, after I posted that bit I thought it may have been more confrontational than I intended. Barry does raise a number of interesting points in regards to the most recent developments. Likewise, I left out a telling detail: in these episodes of Season 3, for the first time, I myself am finding Alma a bit unsympathetic. Cheers!
Meanwhile, Alan Sepinwall says of the fight scene, "Everything about it was mythic."
Plus, a link to my weekly Star-Ledger recap is here .
I think the viewers who are hating Alma the most are lapsing into the hypocritical Victorian morals that Alma was held up against in her time. Why is it that she is so horrible for sleeping with a married man and using drugs, while Trixie seems quite loved--and she'll fellate all comers (no pun intended) and has confessed to drug addiction and multiple abortions? To me it seems obvious that Alma is being held to a higher standard based on the society she was raised in. She was raised in this Jane Austen-like social hierarchy of women being deferential and indirect, so we expect her to act as her society expects her to. Why can't we accept that she is a woman with emotions who is embracing the freedom of her surroundings and acting in a very modern way? Now, I do think that her addiction will hurt more people than, say, the addiction of Leon or any whore--it'll have more repercussions. But I don't think that's cause for reviling her. If anything, it should elicit pity.
Would you prefer the show without Alma?
Not at all! She definitely serves a purpose in the town and on the show. Not every character needs to create drama. Plus, no Molly Parker? Inconceivable.
And by the way, there's no doubt in my mind that Alma was sexually abused by her father. The way he kissed her when they first met in season one, square on the mouth, and Alma's obvious discomfort at being touched by him, and the way she squirmed (and eventually freaked out) whenever he got within hailing distance of Sophia, tell me all I need to know about that. Like I said, I don't have to like Alma, but I certainly do understand her. Empathy should come marching along soon.
The show never reminds me more of "Barry Lyndon" than when Alma is making introductions, or trying to say exactly what she wants while talking around it. It's also worth pointing out that Alma, for all the distrust and dislike she engenders, represents what the "lower class" characters ultimately aspire to become.
Another indicator of Otis Russell's sexual abuse of Alma--Joanie Stubbs is at breakfast when Otis kisses Alma on the mouth, and the expression on her face indicates she knows him for what he is. I think Joanie qualifies as an expert witness on that subject.
The more this thread plays out, the harder it is to hold much against Alma, in my opinion.
She has always reminded me of a more sympathetic Emma Bovary. One visual metaphor has occurred more than once that's straight out of Flaubert--Alma walking through the streets with her skirts dragging in the mud.
for all the distrust and dislike she engenders, represents what the "lower class" characters ultimately aspire to become. You mean filthy rich? Sure. I doubt they envy her in many other ways, though.
David Milch said Alma was NOT sexually abused so that's off the table.
Alicia said...
Why can't we accept that she is a woman with emotions who is embracing the freedom of her surroundings and acting in a very modern way?
People CAN and HAVE accepted similar trats in fictional women for a very long time -- Nora, Hedda Gabler, Elizabeth . . . .
So that's not the problem people are having with this character. For various reasons, I think it just ain't geling. And at this point, I'm not convinced even the author really knows what to do with her.
BTW my experience is very different from Barry's. Hands down, among the "Deadies" I meet, I find Bullock is people's least favorite DW character . . . then Alma. At the other end is usually Al and Jane.
A fine analysis. Do I take it, then, that you feel she started using soon after losing her baby? I thought she told Doc she didn't take any of the laudanum he gave her, not just that she threw away any remainder. Given her resolution in that scene, I was a bit saddened to see her backslide, and I thought she must have started again sometime between her last meeting with Doc and her "meeting" with Leon at the bank.
As for Alma being hated -- for those who read the boards, are people really incensed about her being a drug user and sleeping with Bullock? Because then I would agree with alicia that a double standard is being applied. But speaking for myself, I am frustrated with Alma's character because she takes story time away from other characters I find more compelling and complex.
I have no doubt that Alma has been through hard times -- I would daresay that Trixie, Lila (Joanie's "replacement" at the Bella Union), Joanie herself, Aunt Lou, and Jewel have seen some pretty tough times too, so what makes Alma so special? Why are there so many meaningful looks dedicated to the ended affair between Alma and Seth and so few scenes dedicated to developing the ongoing affair between Sol and Trixie? (And I absolutely agree with Alan that the Trixie/Sol dynamic has become tremendously frustrating -- John Hawkes's Sol Star is apparently going to be the Mayor soon, and we've barely seen him interact with other members of the town. Heck, I think I could make the argument that Hawkes' most compelling role of the past three years was not Sol Starr but Richard Swersey in Me and You and Everyone We Know.)
Alma is a frustrating character because of her passivity in a town populated by men and women (often literally) fighting for their lives. Her rise to power player status in Deadwood was not really earned through the dint of her own labor, and yet her possession of that MacGuffin mine ensures that she is deeply implicated in the machinations of Hearst, Swearengen, and Tolliver, even though she cannot play the game at their level and really hasn't shown any aptitude for learning -- not even taking Bullock or Ellsworth's advice concerning Hearst.
You might think this would make her a sympathetic character -- imagine how we would treat Brom if he hadn't died and was playing the naif instead of his widow -- but in the Deadwood universe weakness is generally punished harshly, and characters have to earn sympathy by showing some initiative. I thought we were going to get that from Alma this season, when she opened the bank (with Sol and Trixie's prodding), confronted Hearst (ill-prepared, but still), and faced the prospect of raising an illegitimate child. But all of these plot points seem only to have served the purpose to bring her back to drugs. (In retrospect, I am not convinced that the writers ever contemplated letting that child live.)
But there's just nothing inherently compelling about watching a junkie whose power and privilege protect her from the harsh consequences of her actions -- and that's not a judgment about Victorian womanhood, but about the more modern obsession with junkies (think Rush , 21 Grams , Requiem for a Dream , Traffic , The Salton Sea , and many, many, many other modern indie films.). I am tremendously fond of Robin Weigert's Calamity Jane, for example, but I recognize that her deep alcoholism limits her growth as a character -- and it is in those moments when she fights her way past/through her alcoholism (as she has with Joanie, Martha and the schoolkids, and Mose somewhat) that she truly becomes a compelling character. But in between these moments Jane drops out of sight and cedes story time to folks like Joanie, Doc, and Hostetler -- other characters, struggling with their own demons, who also deserve some attention. Alma is never allowed to fall that far out of sight, and I just don't see why that should be.
But the storyline we've just entered portends a potentially very hard fall (or an opportunity to rise to the occasion) for Alma, so let's all see what happens.
Anon
The detailing of Alma's attributes overlooks that she has a powerful charisma--beneath, beyond the New Yorker haughtiness--that spoke deeply to Bullock's own smoldering passion. It's been noted elsewhere the hypocrisy of the strutting stalwart being unfaithful. But that's how desireable Alma is to him. He was willing to leave the camp with her straight out--she's the one who came back down to earth and chose not to flee. Then she chose twice, very deliberately, to stay in camp--with the pain of separation from the Sheriff-- to create her life, when she had the option of going back to New York and living off her Deadwood wealth. She's a robustly realized, nuanced character. Brava.
David Milch said Alma was NOT sexually abused so that's off the table.
Why? I mean that sincerely. Firstly, you can't trust everything an artist says about his/her work. Secondly, while Milch is clearly a very hands on fella, who is to say that Parker in her portrayal wasn't tapping into something that was outside of Milch's original intent, yet he decided to keep it. Those scenes between Alma and her dad are hard to interpret any other way, sez I. Even it the abuse wasn't sexual, there has clearly been something nasty going on between them in the past.
dan jardine said...
Why? . . . you can't trust everything an artist says about his/her work. . . Those scenes between Alma and her dad are hard to interpret any other way, sez I..
That was my initial impression too. And since a former Milch character not only had a miscarriage but also shared Alma's maiden name, it makes me think the author changed his mind.
But it hardly matters to me.
A series of misfortunes alone does not make a character interesting. Nor does drowning sorrows in an opium cocktail, by itself, do much to illuminate a human core.
However just looking at Trixie's face -- watching her anxiously smoke a cigarette, after she shot the John and Al nearly crushed her throat with his foot -- made me sit up and take notice. And I would have even if I hadn't seen the previous two scenes or noticed the gun pressed against her chest. I needed virtually NO back story to find her compelling and certainly had no inkling of her future endeavors with accounts. Oddly enough, this was a character Milch said he almost off-ed in the first episode.
The same with Isringhausen. With very little dialog I immediately got a sense of a whole person beneath the formal facade. I might not have known much about her, but I wanted to know more.
It doesn't matter if it's Anne-Marie Duff 's prickly "virgin queen" or Weigert's crabby but lovable Calamiy Jane, or Marchand's dark, joyless, frightening Livia. Regardless of the lot in life or the particulars of the sob story, or how mean or nice, weak or strong . . .some characters just have a crisper, more gripping resonance than others. And I'm all for those getting air time.
Great stuff from the late-night crowd.
Anon: "Do I take it, then, that you feel she started using soon after losing her baby? I thought she told Doc she didn't take any of the laudanum he gave her, not just that she threw away any remainder."
When Doc first offers the drugs, Alma refuses outright. On a follow-up visit, she admits to not taking them, and that's when Doc emphatically recommends she do so for medical reasons. She relents at this point, though all use occurs offscreen; perhaps the gravity of her condition convinces her to acquiesce. When she pays a visit to Doc, he asks if she has followed his instructions to continue taking the "prescription" until the supply runs out. That's when she claims to have thrown the rest away ("I disposed of the medicine you gave me...without having finished taking it.").
Technically speaking, she starts using again during her illness, but I agree that her illicit use begins sometime between this scene and her meeting with Leon, which can't be their first encounter, judging from the gamesmanship. The timeline isn't clear as to how much time elapses between Episodes Three (meeting with Hearst) and Four (the opening of the bank); I believe it's more than the usual day interval.
Anon: "(In retropsect, I am not convinced that the writers ever contemplated letting that child live.)"
I always felt that exact same thing. Not to make excuses for my analytical oversight, but I wonder now if that's why I failed to consider the impact of the abortion on Alma's relapse. I never thought that child would make it onto the show, so the trauma of losing it for Alma slipped right past me.
m.a. peel: "The detailing of Alma's attributes overlooks that she has a powerful charisma."
That's one of the funniest things about her treatment by her fellow citizens, especially the men: when she has them face-to-face and switches into her charismatic mode, they're practically helpless(think Farnum when she follows up on her offer to buy the hotel); behind her back, they're coldly dismissive.
One of the anons wrote:
Alma is a frustrating character because of her passivity in a town populated by men and women (often literally) fighting for their lives. Her rise to power player status in Deadwood was not really earned through the dint of her own labor, and yet her possession of that MacGuffin mine ensures that she is deeply implicated in the machinations of Hearst, Swearengen, and Tolliver, even though she cannot play the game at their level and really hasn't shown any aptitude for learning -- not even taking Bullock or Ellsworth's advice concerning Hearst.
I tend to have the same reaction once an analysis starts to head in a direction like this. And that is, a lens that critical can be applied to anything, so it starts to mean nothing. If you're going to refer to that MacGuffin mine, it might as well be that MacGuffin camp, that MacGuffin saloon owner who just so happened to head to camp to make money off of miners, or that MacGuffin mining magnate.
That said, I suppose it is always a question of tolerance. Does an item that is thought to be one thing ironically turning out to be another strike you as a writer's device, or an intriguing development? As our host as said before, mileage may vary, probably based on context.
Alma is a frustrating character because of her passivity in a town populated by men and women (often literally) fighting for their lives
I would say Alma, almost like a Mersault, is actually making a conscious choice of her passivity. Others have pointed out she had the opportunity to leave and enjoy the MacGuffin wealth, but chooses not to. If this isn't interesting for some, fair enough.
Why are there so many meaningful looks dedicated to the ended affair between Alma and Seth and so few scenes dedicated to developing the ongoing affair between Sol and Trixie?
I agree with you here, and mentioned the lack of Sol this season in the comments about the most recent episode.
Cheers!
Hey james
I would disagree about the MacGuffin aspect. The Garret mine serves the same purpose a set of secret plans or precious jewels plays in a heist flick -- everyone wants the MacGuffin, so that facilitates interaction among the characters. It is not of intrinstic interest -- unlike the Gem or the Bella Union, both of which reveal via their clientele and their management the social structure of Deadwood, though admittedly less this season than previous. Also unlike Hearst who, while he does serve as a focus for the efforts of others, is also a character of intrinsic interest, as this week's episode showed in particular.
The mine need not be a MacGuffin, but it hasn't really been used for anything else but a playing piece for a long time. For example, even though the issue of unionization has been a brewing background story for the Hearst mine, and the treatment of the Cornish and the Chinese a reflection on mining practice (and Hearst's practices) of the time, no mention has been made of any labor or management issues at the Garret mine. In fact, have we even seen a laborer from the Garret mine, except for the one time Wolcott dropped by?
I meant the comment to be more of an observation than a criticism; I've got no problems with MacGuffins -- I wouldn't be able to enjoy any Hitchcock or Coen brothers films if I did. But Alma's proximity to the MacGuffin results in screen time beyond what the character merits, at least in my opinion. I mean, I realize the power players are concerned about the mine, but is no one worried that the camp's only doctor -- maybe the criminally unappreciated Brad Dourif's greatest turn since Cuckoo's Nest, which is a depressing statement to make -- may be a lunger?
(Speaking of Dourif, does anyone have an opinion about John Huston's version of Wise Blood, or Dourif's performance in it?)
Anon
Hey Anon:
I think the sell-by-date on this particular post is fast approaching, but wanted to add one more comment. Given the covnersation on here has been so lively yet polite, I figured I would play contratian once more.
You had me sold on your rationale for the mine being of inherent less interest, but then I thought that, without a strong gold claim (outside of Hearst), people would be complaining about no mining operations in Deadwood getting attention. Also, it was certainly part of showing the camp dynamic during Wolcott and Cy's buyout of smaller claims. That scene with Ellsworth and Wolcott was a good one though, could have stood a few more of those.
That said, I will NOT disagree with you that some of the time dedicated to Alma could go to other characters. But I don't find this necesserily a complaint against the character, but a praise of the richness of the supporting characters. They are drawn so well so quickly, you want more of them.
I've said it about Sol, you're dead on about Doc. I could stand more of Jane and Moses, or rather more in depth with Jane and Moses. Until this business of the livery, even Seth had been quiet for a bit.
Interestingly, a lot of the issues people have with the placement of the Alma character in the narrative has merit, and is very different from the traditional complaints about the character.
Cheers!
Barry - I think episode 4 is indeed meant to take place the day after episode 3 -- in ep. 4 Langrishe tells Joanie he hopes to make a better impression than he did the day before, referring to their meeting in episode 3.
However, a lot surely happened in the ten days between episodes 2 and 3, a time-lapse which also allowed critical recuperation time for Al, Alma, Cy, and E.B. to occur offscreen and not interrupt the dramatic flow.
Anonymous: Great catch on the timeline showing eps. 3 and 4 to be on consecutive days. This creates numerous flaws in my theory for when Alma starts using drugs other than those supplied by Doc. My assertion that her meeting with Leon at the bank is not their first, if still true, means he scores for her BEFORE her visit to Doc and her meeting with Hearst. She could still have thrown away the leftover prescription drugs to give the appearance of getting clean while scoring from Leon during that 10 day interval you refer to. In that case, her proposal to Hearst may be conceived by, as Trixie puts it, "the adult self-deceived." This new theory could also explain her defensiveness to Doc, which I had previously chalked up to Alma mannerisms or a plea for credit due.
Clearly I haven't solved this riddle. Anyone else have ideas on this reconstructed timeline?
Okay I'll bite.
James said...
Others have pointed out she had the opportunity to leave and enjoy the MacGuffin wealth, but chooses not to. If this isn't interesting for some, fair enough.
James that's fine as far as it goes but that isn't very far. If the author's intention was to show a dampened but unbroken spirit, yearning for full expression, it was lost. Mainly because it isn't supported much by the script or characterization. So I can't really tell why Alma stayed in DW.
If, for example, living with her devious father had manifested in a mercurial master-player, well practiced in the art of working people and shrewdly turning situations to her advantage, it would explain how she had the stuff to stay and navigate her way through a murderous town to begin with. Simply to say, she did, so she must be brave isn't enough. It fails to to match character profile with action and reads like a contrivance (lucking out a lot or being quicker than Brom or EB doesn't qualify her for the olympics). Instead we get a mostly anemic addict who can be head strong and very little else.
Annd if Alma falls short in the overall premise, she doesn't seem to fit exposition, presumably, there to tell us about her in other ways either.
Do you remember when she told Sophia that women might actually be interested in what men had to say if they could actually stand them? Does she seem to possess an especially curious nature to you? Has she even been shown to be, say, an avid reader? Or kept a journal, or told Sophia imaginative stories, or picked Merrick's brains about news events or anything at all? Then why put those words in her mouth?
Otherwise the examination of her actions and acquisitions, are sketchy and to me, offer little insight or interest.
Mother Alma: True she took in an orphan who at the time, had few, if any, realistic prospects but doesn't seem to relate to her all that well. But what might have revealed a profound capacity or desire to nurture in ways she wasn't, . . . didn't. In fact the woman seems down right distant-- except for the occasional shared smile or giggle. While Sophia is protected, her interests looked after, nurturing doesn't seem high on Alma's to do list. And it can't all be explained away by tragedy, mood altering tonics or 19th century schooling. I mean look how well Trixie, Jane, and Isringhausen connect with her in the simplest exchanges. Now if she's struggling with or perhaps not cut out for motherhood, fine but why not make that clear? She doesn't need to be Trixie (who among us is) or Janice Soprano; but she needs to be something. At best, Alma does no harm. Of course she may mess up with the dope, but that still won't clarify the essential relationship. Why bother with the story and not explore it?
Banker Alma: She may well have opened the bank's doors but has she ever thrown herself into intense study that might actually qualify her to run it? Does she even seem driven to do such things? You'd think some of Trixie's work ethic would have rubbed off on her --between spying for Al, whoring for Al, looking out for Alma's best interest while spying for Al, assisting Doc in surgery, alerting necessary parties of probable jackpots, and helping Sol with the books (which is a lot more than Seth seems to do but that's a whole other conversation), the woman is a friggin typhoon of determination, the town's de facto general manager (though this character seems to be languishing now, reduced to a vehicle for other stories). B Even if she struggled hard and failed that would be fine. But like the Sophia story, these details don't seem important enough to the author to firmly establish one way or the other..
Gold Claim Alma: pretty much as Banker Alma, give or take:
So what is important? I think Alma's most, defining moments, are one's relating to matters of the groin. They include : sex with a man she's NOT attracted to, cramps, sex with a man she IS attracted to, pregnancy and subsequent miscarriage, threat of rape by a ruthless tycoon, close call with a 2nd man she's not attracted to . . .
And Alma has a tendency to take drugs to quell pain brought on mostly by things relating to the groin. For me, these scenes are her signature and most involving. Notably: the vague damp-eyed stare, agreeable flirtatious manner, graceful, undulating head, pallid face framed in a billow of raven locks and delicate white nighty -- a stunning portrait of Victorian privilege gone awry, gorgeously executed by Parker.
Unfortunately she carries that ethereal presence, to distraction, even when she's not stoned. That may be fine for a supporting character or a story about a tragic underachiever (see Jennifer Jason Leigh in "Georgia", -- a less polite but infinitely more concise version of a junkie, and deluded singer who spirals down to failure spectacularly). But not as a dominant trait of a supposedly spirited, if confused, brave one, who's willing to put herself within an inch of her life for freedom, not to me anyway.
Accomplishments aside, Trixie and Jane at their most strung out, seem more conscious and defined. Trixie may act in part because of her life circumstance and good heart, but only in part. Many born into similar would do less. What sets her apart is an innate drive to act. In her case, the sob story, insecurities and whiskey are just obstacles. She may get laid more than Alma but her character's a lot less about sex and general confusion. And all this is clear.
Essentially Alma seems defined by problems. She's also so passively explored, that like Anon, I have to wonder why the decision to feature her so much. I also find the author's apparent reluctance to develop and ground his leading lady much beyond feminine frailty and addiction, in a dirty, dangerous Deadwood, troubling. Especially when other characters -- even ones with worse problems -- are so much more. And I wonder, if or when this character finally rises out of the ashes . . . will it be earned?
Post a Comment