by Andrew Dignan
For a show the features polar bears in the jungle, the walking dead, malevolent trails of “living” black smoke and a landlocked slave ship, it’s some kind of an accomplishment that anything can really throw you for a loop at this point. But damn, I’m still trying to wrap my mind around that giant four-toed foot.
Short on concrete answers, but positively bursting with tantalizing new questions and out and out weirdness, Wednesday’s two hour finale “Live Together, Die Alone” (written by show-runner Damon Lindelof and regular contributor Carlton Cuse) represents everything that makes “Lost” one of the boldest yet most frustrating shows on television. Setting about closing the door on some of the show’s long-standing mysteries, the show goes about this by throwing everything including the kitchen-sink (as well as a washer and dryer set) at us poor overwhelmed viewers.
Like I said a couple weeks back, the show’s writers read our griping, and they once again responded: Have fun making heads or tails of this for the next five months.
Often the "Lost’s" greatest failing is the way it shoe-horns in extraneous flashbacks to pad-out the run-time. Not so here as “Live Together…” finds the show operating with an urgency that’s nearly dizzying. Covering so many events tied into the show’s ever-expanding mythology that even with a protracted run-time it barely is enough to give everything its due, the episode ostensibly answers what happens when you don’t press the button. Who is the mastermind behind the Others, who was in the hatch before Desmond (Henry Ian Cusack), and what caused the crash of Oceanic Flight 815? It answers these questions in the way that only “Lost” can, which is to say I’m more confused now than I was going in.
As expected, we learn that the yacht seen at the end of last week’s episode does in fact belong to Desmond, who's currently onboard and properly soused, having been unsuccessful in sailing home. We learn from Desmond’s flashbacks that he spent time in a British military prison for “not following orders,” an ambiguous crime no doubt destined for flashback treatment should Cusack return next season as a regular. Ordered to never again contact his girlfriend Penelope by her evil rich father, Desmond plans on sailing around the world in a yacht race sponsored by the old man, with both love and honor on the line, all so he can get back to his beloved Penelope (who’s no doubt in Ithaca… I swear this show veers uncomfortably close to homework at times).
Of course, the show being what it is, Desmond doesn’t just get any boat, but one belonging to the recently deceased Libby (Cynthia Watros with Joyce Dewitt bangs), who mere seconds after meeting the Brit on line at a Starbucks, pays for the guy’s coffee and hands over a yacht that belonged to her dead husband. I guess it’s true what the say about women and men with British accents.
In all seriousness though, I’d initially chalked this up to one of the show’s patented contrivances, but as it was pointed out to me, she does have a history of mental illness. Interestingly, she mentions her dead spouse was named David, and knowing that she shared time in the same asylum that Hurley did one can’t help but wonder if this is an intentional callback to the big man’s imaginary friend (or perhaps it at least explains further why she had such an affinity for the guy).
As we learned in the first episode of season 2, “Man of Science, Man of Faith,” Desmond eventually washed ashore, failing to finish the race and becoming de-facto caretaker of “the Swan.” What we didn’t know till now was that his hatch-mate for nearly three years was Inman (Clancy Brown), last seen coercing Sayid into torturing a man during the first Gulf War. Inman, wearing a flimsy hazmat suit and gas mask, drags the waterlogged Desmond from the beach to the hatch, claiming ignorance as to the whereabouts of Desmond’s boat. Inman speaks in Cold War spy riddles and asks if Desmond is “him,” possibly the same “he” that Henry Gale once spoke of in hushed tones.
Inman instills in Desmond a sense of fear in the island that not only keeps him pushing the button but confined to the hatch for years. He removes some of the shrouding from “the incident” that requires the routine of the numbers, foretelling the apocalypse that awaits them if the routine is broken (at one point when asked what he’s doing he wearily responds “saving the world”). Most importantly, while drunk and despondent he introduces a fail safe switch and the key which Inman cryptically tells us when turned makes “all of this go away.”
Much of “Lost’s” power stems from the way, we’re never certain how truthful the information we’re being told is, and how that misinformation can lead the characters (and the viewer) down a dangerous path. Nearly every authority figure’s motives are suspect and can often be debunked, as is the case with Inman who after allowing himself to be followed by Desmond,
is witnessed removing his protective clothing and breathing apparatus (to prevent against “contamination” of course) and leads us right to Desmond’s boat, tucked safely away in a serene cove. Inman has fabricated the infection story to steal away time to repair the vessel and after being caught in his lie, tells Desmond “screw the button, who knows if it’s even real.” Is the man lying about everything or has he given us just enough rope to hang ourselves? In a fit of rage, Desmond murders Inman (who, despite “ten years as a spook” is startlingly easy to kill) only to find back at the hatch, the world has gone to shit.
The electromagnetic buildup that the numbers safely relieve has caused the hatch to go haywire. Remiss in pushing the buttons, Desmond frantically tries to execute the program as cutlery and cookware flies about his head and the computer menacingly reads “system failure.” Able to bring the system back online, it’s only later that Desmond learns that this phenomenon coincides with the exact date and time Oceanic 815 crash landed on the island. Guess that was a bad day for everyone.
Desmond isn’t the only one who allows himself to be misled in this episode. Locke—reverting to a rebellious teenager, spurning everything he once held sacred to prove he knows what’s best—finally gets his wish to see what happens when no one enters the numbers. Eko is lured away from the computer and kept at bay by blast doors (it’s so simple to trigger a lockdown, one wonders if this isn’t what happened in the first place back when Lock was confined by one a few episodes back) spending the rest of the show desperately trying to get back in. Convinced that they’re all trapped in an experiment in controlled behavior, Locke waits with Desmond for the timer to tick down to zero, certain in the anticlimax that awaits them.
Having witnessed first-hand the consequences of playing chicken with pressing the button, it’s initially baffling why Desmond chooses to go along with Locke’s plan. Yet the deeper we delve into his past, the more we see a history riddled with self-doubt and allusions to suicide. Sentimentally towing along Charles Dickens’ Our Mutual Friend, which he hopes to be the last thing he reads before he dies, Desmond has walked to the edge and seems destined to go down in a blaze of glory with Locke foolishly leading the way.
Oh, but poor Locke learns the err of his ways too late to do anything about it. In a terrifyingly cinematic sequence, the hatch literally folds in on itself in a violent flurry of electromagnetic energy once the counter reaches zero. Locke sadly apologizes to Eko for the fate his hubris has brought upon them as we at home resign ourselves to losing the show’s two most interesting characters and an enigmatic newcomer. Ultimately though, Desmond proves he does have the courage to “pull his finger out of the damn, and blow the whole thing up.” Convinced that it will save the lives of Locke and Eko, Desmond turns the key and we see a momentary, blinding white light that permeates the entire island accompanied by a low, mechanical rumbling. Ominously, the door to the hatch is hurtled through the air, landing miles away at the castaways’ camp.
The status of Desmond, Locke and Eko hangs in the balance, left unresolved at episode’s-end, but the fall-out of their activities is being felt a world away. For the first time in the show’s history we cut to the present-day world outside of the island where two tech geeks (speaking Portuguese I’m told) in the South Pole are in a tizzy over an electromagnetic anomaly. They quickly dial civilization to alert them of the situation only for the person on the other end to be revealed as Desmond’s lost love Penelope. At one point she told him, “with enough money and determination you can find anyone,” and if this is any indication, her wealth and perseverance may be leading her to a tropical island in the near future.
The business with the South Pole and Penelope is staggering, mostly because it eliminates several theories from the table regarding the castaways. We can most-likely strike that they’re in limbo, hovering between heaven and earth, as well as this all being a collective Jungian dream shared as the plane goes down. These people do still exist as does the world outside of them (scratch the “the island is a safe haven from the end of the world” theory as well). But why the South Pole? And does this have anything to do with a character referring to them all being stuck in a snow globe? And will this finally explain that damn polar bear?
Back to more people who’ve been misled, the hunting party bound for Others beach uncovers Michael’s deception, and takes it a lot better than I probably would. Revealed by Jack as a multiple-murderer who has betrayed his friends to the enemy, the quartet continue following Michael’s lead, who, unbeknownst to them, still has one more trick up his sleeve. Leading them to a clearing and not the beach we’d seen last week (where Sayid has secretly been dispatched), the castaways are debilitated by electro-charged darts, bound and taken away by the Others who had been laying in wait.
Gagged and taken to a dock, the captives learn the man behind the Others is none other than our favorite moon-faced former prisoner, Henry Gale. Staying true to the pact struck with Michael, Walt is returned to him along with a motorized boat and instructions on how to return to civilization. If the lack of underhandedness here comes as a surprise, then so should Gale’s proclamation that “we’re the good guys.” I’m starting to wonder if we’re not subjects of behavior control ourselves, spending two years rooting for our merry band of castaways who have been causing nothing but trouble for the poor people of the Dharma Initiative. Are they truly benevolent (I’m racking my brains here, and aside from Ethan stringing up Charlie back in season 1, I’m not certain they’ve actually harmed anyone, yet) or am I not the only one who thinks it won’t be smooth sailing for Michael and Walt back to the real world?
So Hurley is released to warn away the rest of the castaways while Michael and Walt drive off in the boat and Jack, Kate and Sawyer are “coming home” with Henry Gale and the gang. And that’s it. That was the season that was. I’d hoped to do a more thorough analysis of the season at large and how the finale subverts themes of “us vs. them” and expands upon the already touched upon issues of control and faith, but frankly my head is still swimming at the sheer amount of stuff thrown at us in such a short period of time. I feel like the best I can do is simply lay everything out and hope to make sense of it all at a later date.
All this text and I still haven’t even gotten into the fact that Inman drew the imaginary map inside the hatch, the abandoned facades over at Others’ beach, the pile of pneumatic tubes from “the Pearl,” the still-baffling love connection between recent mom Claire and suspected baby-napper Charlie, the giant bird that says Hurley’s name and, of course, that big old disembodied foot that looks like what the Statue of Liberty might have been like if Homer Simpson were used as the model.
Despite all the confusion it produced, there’s a refreshing level of candor to the episode, as characters found themselves openly discussing conspiracy theories (“my theory: they’re aliens” says Sawyer about the Others, giving voice to a scenario no more far fetched that the ones circling the net), applying common sense to what purpose Hurley could possibly serve to the Others (as a non-threatening town crier, of course) and criticizing “Mr. Friendly” (here referred to by his Christian name, Tom, much to his consternation) and his crape-hair beard. Since another widely shared annoyance about the show is how everyone seems to act like idiots most of the time, this has to be seen as an encouraging development.
The finale did what it’s supposed to do. Scatter its various characters to the wind, introducing new avenues of drama for next season and left us with baited breath to find out what happens next. I had hoped the episode might more definitively answer some of the questions that have been posed, but of course an answer is only satisfying for a few moments, while more questions will keep you worked up for months. Alright; sign me up for season 3.
Thursday, May 25, 2006
Lost Thursday: Season 2, Ep. 23: "Live Together, Die Alone"
Labels:
Andrew Dignan,
Lost,
Lost: Season 2,
TV Recap
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
24 comments:
As to whether the Others harmed anyone besides Charlie, there was that guy that Ana-Lucia kept in the pit. Goodwin let him out and then snapped his neck.
Ethan also killed Scott (or Steve?) once Claire had returned, threatening to kill "one of them every day until she was returned" to him.
Other than that?
And as for questions, why are Jack, Sawyer and Kate chosen by the Others? My theory: They've been observing the victims of the plane wreck, and have identified these three as the key leaders and decision-makers of the group, and have removed them in order to see what effect it has upon the remaining society. How will the group function without these three to tell 'em what to do? Oughta be interesting. Sorta like a social experiment.
Alright, alright that theory clearly blew up in my face. Selective memory. Still, I'm intrigued by the idea that these guys aren't all-purpose boogey-men who exist just to torment our poor castaways. I'm still clinging to the idea that there's reasoning behind their behavior, where perhaps killing off a handful of lesser characters is still a means to an end.
I'm pretty certain "Gale" was right about his people being "the good guys", but of course it remains to be seen what that means.
I can't belive I missed the symbolism of the name "Penelope"...I feel like a complete idiot for letting that one slip by me.
Granted, we only saw one leg of that statue, but I was immediately reminded of the "vast and trunkless legs of stone from Shelley's "Ozymandias", which--and this is a stretch--brought to mind mad messianic millionaire Adrian Veidt, a/k/a the superhero Ozymandias in Alan Moore's Watchmen, who planned to (spoiler) destroy New York City in a fake alien attack in order to unite the USA and Soviet Union together against a mutial (albeit nonexistent) threat, thereby pulling the world back from the brink of a seemingly inevitable thermonuclear war. A lot of the Dharma stuff we've seen seems like the kind of stuff you'd get from someone who thinks that way.
It kind of underserves Carlton Cuse's role on the show to call him merely a "regular contributor". Cuse was the mentor of Lindelof and Shawn Ryan--he gave both of them their first TV writing jobs when he was the showrunner of Nash Bridges, and when I've interviewed them at various points, Ryan and Lindelof both cited Cuse as the guy who really taught them the fundamentals of writing for TV (as well as how to administer a writing staff and do everything else a showrunner does). He performed a similar role for a number of the staff writers from Angel who also got started on Nash and wound up with Ryan on The Shield. Looking at the chronology of the show's credits, it appears that Lindelof hired Cuse about four of five episodes into season one, perhaps to fill the gap left by J.J. Abrams' withdrawal to go do M:I III.. A lot of recent interviews I've read with Abrams and Lindelof refer to Cuse as if he's gradually become the co-showrunner, but he seems content to stay in the background and let Lindelof be the public face of the show.
From a source close, very close, to one of the actors, the powers that be have this thing laid out for eight seasons. I don't see it. Not eight seasons. Look at other shows of this kind: "The X Files", "Nowhere Man", they were doomed, or they jumped the shark at some point, which amounts to the same thing. Let's not forget "Twin Peaks".
I like the idea that the show might find some wiggle room by occasionally leaving the island and watching Pen Widmore's attempt to find her beloved and perhaps uncovering the real deal with her father's corporation, the Hanso folk and Dharma. Again, we see one of the show's big themes- the clash of an offspring and its domineering father- present in Pen Widmore's story.
"If" Michael and Walt make it through the shield and reach the world outside that sets up the potential for a meet between he and Pen, which would offer him a shot at redemption and the answer to the question: Can he yet be saved? Which is also a huge part of the "Lost" mythology.
But if one of the actors doesn't get contractual satisfaction in the form of more money and a bigger part on the show, my source tells me it won't matter. This actor will walk. Too bad. Season 3 would be more interesting with this actor still involved.
Perhaps they took Jack, Kate and Sawyer not just because of their obvious influence among the plane-crash survivors, but because they have the least "faith" of that group. Even pragmatic, vengeful Sayid is motivated by a longing to reunite with Nadia (sublimated through his romance with Shannon). Charlie, Claire, Sun, Jin, et al. all have something like true love or religious faith driving them (even if it wavers, as with Locke). Jack is a skeptic and an arrogant control freak; Sawyer is cynicism personified (or self-loathing personified, or both); Kate doesn't know what the hell she wants besides her own self-preservation --- she's constantly ambivalent.
Life on the island plays out as a means for people of faith to grapple with that faith. The island pushes you to confront how much you're willing to believe. (E.g., it lures you to the Pearl station with dreams --- first by setting up your protege to die so that the Beechcraft can land on the right spot, then by bringing you back again to have your faith shattered or strengthened, depending on who you are.) If the Others are island true believers, they want people who can help them in their mission to realize their island social utopia (powered by "geologically unique" electromagnetism with all sorts of miraculous benefits). So they either want Jack, Kate and Sawyer to convert or to isolate.
OK, this theory makes no sense. It's not even a theory.
Inman is on the island for god knows how long, Del for 3 years, yet it is Eko and Locke, on the island for a couple of months, who find the other hatch? I smell a rat. Is there a plausible explanation beyond writer's error?
So, KJ, someone on Lost is already getting too big for his britches? He should do some research and look up these names:
Stevenson, McLean;
Long, Shelly; and
Duchovny, David.
...David Caruso, Wayne Rogers, Jimmy Fallon, etc
Don't forget Sherry Stringfeld...
My question is "Where's Vincent?" Would Walt let them leave without him?
We've seen the name "Widmore" at least three times this season. On the hot air baloon, on the pregnancy test, and in Charlie's flashback.
However, in the Lost book (and presumably some of websites related to the show) we learn that Alvar Hanso has a strong connection to the Widmore family.
Great comments by everyone.
Andrew Johnston: "The Watchman" seems to have influenced nearly every facet of popular storytelling over the last 20 years (or so I'm continuously being told) so I wouldn't be surprised if the show fell under that sphere of influence as well. Alas, I'm something of a comic book Philistine, so I have yet to read it myself, but if it helps me grasp more of what I'm seeing on the show than I may have to buckle down and give it a try.
No disrespect meant towards Mr. Cuse. I certainly have been reading a lot more comments from him in the press than the vaunted JJ Abrams this season, so I don't wand to undermine his influence on the show.
JK said: "I like the idea that the show might find some wiggle room by occasionally leaving the island and watching Pen Widmore's attempt to find her beloved"
Perhaps, but I think there's too much slack as is, with the repeated flashbacks often defusing the tension of the show. By showing extensively the activities of those safely in the outside world, I think it opens the show up to a dangerous precedent. Starting delving into the back-story of Penelope or Alvar Hanso say, and the sky's the limit. The show can start introducing real world associates of these characters with their own stories and so on and so forth. At least by limiting the narrative thrust (what a horrible Syd Field-ian expression; too hung-over to think of something that makes me look smarter) to those currently on the island, it helps keep the show honest and on point.
Now, that being said, I am very much looking forward to next season's inevitable trips down memory lane for Henry Gale, Mr. Friendly and Alex Rousseau (the latter especially) as I think this is the way the show is going to organically sustain itself for the next few years. Like I said, I think the finale very effectively set the wheels in motion for dozens of new plot lines, which is all very encouraging.
Dan Jardine: I agree, this is probably a strategic move on their part. Although I think it's a bit of a stretch to call Sawyer a leader, he does have an Alpha male personality to him that could rally others to their cause. At the same time, do they (and I guess we) think so little of Sayid that we couldn't imagine him filling much the void that those three would?
RE: Inman and the island. While Eko and Locke may actually step foot in the hatch first (we're assuming), they did it with the map drawn in part by Inman, so he is versed in island lore somewhat. Who knows, perhaps he's the one who drew the giant question mark in the dirt (or perhaps Del before him). I think there's more to the story here, but to my mind it makes sense.
Klam: I think you might be onto something regarding the island as a test of faith. Let's follow the history of that aircraft for a second: it crashes on the island w/ Eko's dead brother inside. Eko finds the plane and his faith is bolstered. Locke finds the plane w/ Boone, Boone is killed by it and Locke's faith is weakened, leading him to bang on the hatch in frustration. This in turn strengthens Desomnd's resolve (quite literally preventing him from killing himself) who flicks on a light which restores Locke's hope and his need to explore the hatch further.
Later that same plane leads to the Pearl, hidden under that cursed/blessed plane which shatters Locke's beliefs and leads us to the events of the last episode. All three of the people who may or may not have been killed in the Hatch at the end of the finale are there at that moment all because Locke and Boone found that plane. That's kind of cool.
In terms of faith, the three people taken by the Others could described as the most pragmatic and least susceptible to issues of faith (especially Jack).
More Others Naughtiness:
* Kidnapping of multiple children
* Attempted murder of Mr. Eko
* Attempted murder of Michael/Sawyer/Jin
* Killing "Henry Gale" (allegedly)
" At least by limiting the narrative thrust (what a horrible Syd Field-ian expression; too hung-over to think of something that makes me look smarter) to those currently on the island, it helps keep the show honest and on point."
I'll give you that, Andrew, but only if Lindelof/Cuse tighten some shit up on that island. I know some bitch about the flashbacks, but they're useful. I'd like to see some of what is learned back there become actionable on the island. I've given up on the myriad coincidences. While interseting, I don't think they mean much. I want to see some development made with this "Bad Parent" theme they've got working. Can we get Nic Roeg to do a two-parter? Just a thought...
This show is extremely frustrating, and not just because I'm not getting what I want. I'm invested, here. I'm willing to play along, but often I feel as though these guys are just teasing. Or they think they're smarter than they really are. And too much teasing becomes finally just mean.
kj: I share your frustration, but it's often a knee-jerk reaction and after I've had a little bit of time to think about the show, I definitely become more open to the way the show's contrivances and coincidences might be part of a larger design, as with my plane epiphany a few posts back. (Oddly enough, this is the opposite response I've been having to the Sopranos this season, where I'm initially grateful just to be watching the show, only to reflect later and become disappointed at the rut it's dug itself into) Since we are talking about genre here, where a dues ex machina can always be just a scene away, I allow for a little bit of leeway.
Plus, (and this is coming from someone who presided over the last season of "The X-Files" like you would a sick grandparent, just praying for the suffering to end but being unable to imagine the world without them in it) we all know that what ever the final answer is, it's going to disappoint a lot more people than it's going to please. It's the nature of the beast. As long as they keep dragging this out in a way that doesn't insult the viewer's intelligence I think they'll be golden.
BF: While I don't agree that kidnapping children makes them inherently bad (they certainly don't seem to be harming them, and are most likely protecting them) and shooting Sawyer was in self-defense (he was reaching for the gun tucked in his waste band if memory serves), there's no denying that I was wearing some rose-tinted glasses when I posed the question of "what have the Others done to us lately?" Their methods can be on the rough side, but they seem to play by the rules ("don't cross this line and go back to your camp", giving Walt and the boat to Michael, etc...) which seems out of sorts for a bunch of heartless marauders, no?
I took the snow globe line as a reference to the final episode of St. Elsewhere, in which the whole series is revealed to be the product of a little boy's imagination, and he's got a snow globe with the hospital (and presumably all its inhabitants) that he's been fantasizing about. Just another reference to other works (like Turn of the Screw, Occurrence at Owl-Creek Bridge) in which reality is not what it seems.
josh:
Excellent catch w/ the snowglobe/St. Elsewhere reference. "Lost" is so openly self-referential and yet this flew completely by me as I watched it. I've begun to grudgingly admire the way the show's writers are a bunch of pop culture fiends who openly engage with their source material and inspirations. It's like the show's way of defusing fan-theories with a friendly nod of acknowledgement, like "yeah we thought of that too."
The snow globe could also be a reference to Citizen Kane. Kane is the prototype of the omnipotent authority figure gone bad, and there seem to be more than a few of those in these characters' backgrounds.
Four toed foot wearing sandals?
It think it's obvious, people: They're in the Genesis Tub!
I've been wondering why they chose Jack, Sawyer and Kate to be taken.I know a lot of people are saying that these three are the leaders of the cast-aways, but that's not really true. Jack is the de-facto leader of the band, true, but Sawyer just has power because he stashed a lot of weapons, medicine, etc.- he doesn't really have any inclination to be a leader. And Kate is basically a tag-along to Jack- she doesn't really think up much on her own. It would have made much more sense to take Locke, Sayyid, or Eko, people who are natural leaders and far more of a loss to the group.
Okay, Penelope's from The Odyssey. Locke, Rousseau, and (now) Hume are 18th Century philosophers. How about "Henry Gale?" Remember Dorothy Gale and her Uncle Henry? And how she befriended a "wizard" who travelled to a strange land by balloon? Just like the "real" Henry Gale!
Makes you wonder who LOST's "man behind the curtain" will turn out to be.
Post a Comment