Monday, April 10, 2006

The Sopranos Mondays: Season 6, Ep. 5, "Mr. & Mrs. John Sacrimoni Request"

By Matt Zoller Seitz.

Sunday's episode of "The Sopranos" began with the reading of a wedding invitation, then showed the bride's father, imprisoned mob boss Johnny "Sack" Sacrimoni, taking off his jailhouse togs, donning a suit and tie, and petitioning the court for permission to attend an event he'd waited his whole life to see. He was allowed six hours of freedom, including transportation time, provided he paid for security screening at the wedding and reception and spent all six hours within sight distance of federal agents. Of course Johnny agreed. What else could he do?

The blessed event started with a metal detector screening at the church that nearly exhausted the gunshot-weakened Tony. It continued with an awkward reception dance between gangsters and agents, and ended with Johnny being prematurely evicted from the cake-cutting ceremony and packed off to jail in tears. (Afterward, Tony’s boys mocked Johnny's breakdown as a sign of weakness – a scene that informed Tony’s climactic decision to reassert his Alpha Male dominance by beating his muscular new henchman to the floor of the Bada-Bing office, then loping off the to washroom to puke blood in private, twice.)

Are we ever going to see a stand-alone episode of “The Sopranos” again? I’m not complaining; I’m just curious, because this one flowed naturally out of episodes One through Four, all of which have insisted on the baseline ugliness of gangster life, and exposed the anxiety beneath the macho façade of nearly everyone in this line of work (except maybe Paulie Walnuts, who once announced he’d tallied up his major and minor sins, assigned each one a purgatorial value, then resolved to do the time). Written by Terence Winter and directed by actor-filmmaker and regular “Sopranos” helmer Steve Buscemi, this episode zeroed in on a facet of gangster life that's usually acknowledged only in passing: the mostly-hidden social cost of being a mobster.

As we've already seen in "The Sopranos" and pretty much every prior gangster story, the gangster life affords crude freedoms denied to the law-abiding. Mobsters steal and kill, they keep mistresses and cavort with hookers and strippers, they entrap and destroy decent people, and they bribe society's guardians to look the other way. (The wives and girlfriends are bought off, too.) But the gangster’s freedom isn't absolute. Besides the obvious downsides (incarceration, death) there are serious, if typically invisible, social penalties. A gangster can’t forge honest or meaningful relationships with anyone who’s not part of The Life because he can’t risk revealing what he really does for a living. (That’s why Tony’s terrified of losing his gig as a “waste management consultant” – it’s not just an easy paycheck, it’s his cover story and the source of his health plan and tax forms.) Most of all, the lie envelops the gangster's wife and children, who publicly endorse the breadwinner's facade because if they don't, no one will. But over time, deception becomes self-deception. Six seasons after we first met them, Tony, Carmela, Meadow and A.J. are only now beginning to understand that the world knows their business, and probably always has.

Social-striving mobsters live in constant fear that their veneer of respectability will be torn away and they'll be exposed as parasites. Sometimes they're doomed to be exposed anyway; no matter how circumspect the gangster and his family are, there will still be days when the larger society (represented by cops or prosecutors) feels emboldened to call a gangster a gangster and make everyone connected with the life feel like the pariahs they are. "The Sopranos" has often acknowledged this anxiety in the past, but never as frankly as in Sunday's episode. Except for the prosecutor who fought Johnny’s day pass, the government adopted a businesslike attitude toward their arrangement with Johnny -- yet somehow the day still felt like a public shaming in black tie. Winter's script deployed these elements without fuss, and Buscemi deepened them with God’s-eye view shots that physically diminished the gangsters at key moments (the wedding guests ascending a spiral staircase; Vito getting situated in the motel; Tony puking blood in the men’s room.)

But there were missteps. I bought the dramatic necessity of Tony beating down his new henchman – the whole episode built up to that fight – but washroom scene or no washroom scene, I didn’t believe he could have thrashed such a strong man in his surgery-weakened condition. (If the muscleman had held back for fear of getting beaten down or killed by Tony’s crew, the moment would have been more plausible – and, in light of the crew’s opportunism and nonstop yammering about weakness, more complicated.) And while Vito's forced eviction from the closet jibed thematically with the rest of the episode, which was all about the public exposure of lies, it was crudely written and cloddishly executed; “The Wire” handled a similar moment with more imagination and subtlety. (How much you want to bet that series creator David Chase kept the Vito-in-the-closet subplot puttering along for two seasons just so he could force Joe Gannascoli into that leatherman outfit?)

I’m also getting restless during Tony’s therapy scenes. Aside from the occasional contrived but amusing one-liner (“Let me ask you right off, is there any chance of a mercy fuck?”) they tend not to justify their screen time, much less tell us anything we couldn’t glean by paying attention to the images and dialogue (even those are sometimes too emphatic, like the cut from Johnny’s skinny daughter saying “Food” to the exterior of Satriale’s pork store). I’m also frustrated with Melfi in general, not just because she's content to treat the symptoms of Tony’s unhappiness rather than its obvious cause (his criminality), but because the show itself seems to be content with her contentment.

As for the likelihood of Tony going straight vs. reintegrating into The Life, I'll make no predictions. That final beatdown shows that Tony is being tugged back toward the old life (an event presaged by his decision to indulge Johnny's request for a whacking-by-proxy instead of resisting it). But the following scene in the men's room is a reminder of the sacrifices Tony makes to maintain the status quo. This life is literally destroying him; he made his choice, and now he's paying in blood. He falls to his knees and vomits. Then he looks at himself in the mirror with a cocky-scary “I’m back” expression; then a shadow of doubt crosses his face. Then he drops to all fours and vomits again. This is a different kind of cost-benefit analysis -- conducted by the body, not the mind.

43 comments:

Matt Zoller Seitz said...

PS -- This one is technically still a "Sopranos Monday," although if i'd waited much longer it would have been Tuesday. Sorry about that -- between a weekend trip and a breaking news story today, it's been tough to carve out the time to meet this obligation.

Also, before I forget -- here's the link to Alan Sepinwall's weekly rundown in the Star-Ledger.

Sean Burns said...

Yes, seeing Joey G in the CRUISING get-up was one of the cheaper laughs in the show's history.

And I think part of the reason it clanged so loudly was because the episode was otherwise so uncomfortably attuned to tinier humiliations -- constant little social pinpricks that, when piled on top of one another (with no small thanks to Buscemi's usual keenly observant camera placement) started to feel like massive hemmorhaging wounds as the hour wore on and Tony and Johnny found themselves losing control of their crews.

Interesting call about not believing that T would be able to thrash Mr. Muscles Of Bloomfield like that. I honestly didn't think to question the plausibility both times I watched the episode - so now you got me thinking that, just like the guys in his crew, I also just really needed to watch Tony smack the shit out of somebody.

And seeing Gandolfini's bloody, grinning mug in that mirror once again reminded me we're watching the performance of a lifetime here.

I had more patience than you with regard to this week's Melfi scenes. For awhile there I felt like the show had outgrown her character, but this week I was happy to see a return to the original punchline of Season One -- all her professional theraputic advice really does is help Tony become a better gangster.

These Terence Winter episodes are always the funniest. (I let out a girlish yelp that sorta frightened my Dad when this week's writer/director credits came onscreen.) If nothing else, this episode boasted the funniest GODFATHER riff they've done in ages. I'll never get tired of the confused, exasperating communication breakdowns that occur whenever Tony and Christopher attempt to have a serious conversation.

But then again, as our friend Andrew Dignan said to me last night: "Aw, you're always a sucker for stuff where the hero's head ends up in a toilet."

Matt Zoller Seitz said...

Sean writes: "This week I was happy to see a return to the original punchline of Season One -- all her professional theraputic advice really does is help Tony become a better gangster." Yeah, Chase has no love for therapy, and you could that even more than a mob story, this series is his revenge against therapy and therapists. It's a good joke. But it's played out, and if Gandoflini and Bracco didn't have such strong chemistry after all these years, I would probably have even less patience for it.

Edward Copeland said...

I thought this episode moved at a crawl. There was certainly a lot to like, but it seemed a letdown after last week's excellent outing. Speaking of outing, even though they implied Vito contemplating suicide, I doubt they'd do that this soon after Eugene Pontecorvo's suicide. My guess is he's contemplating whacking the guys who saw him. Also, since we've never seen those collectors before, I suspect that those are part of the NY crew -- and what Vito is really afraid of is word getting back to Phil Leotardo, since he's married to Vito's cousin. Also, I'm more convinced that there is something relating to terrorism coming with the return of the Middle Eastern men visiting Chris and asking for access to automatic weapons. Could this be laying the groundwork for how the Feds will eventually squeeze Chris into singing -- by tying him to terrorism as opposed to mob activity?

Andrew Dignan said...

A few episodes back (the archives are a god-send by the way) Matt said about a Vito gag:

"you're dead on in that specific citation, how it represents the series at its most glib. I cringed, too. During moments like that, "The Sopranos" really is as crude and reductive as detractors say."

I would point to this episode as Exhibit A in making future arguments of this nature. Let's be clear, I giggled almost incessantly throughout the episode, but it was the worst kind of amusement, akin to laughing at Heller Keller jokes when you're in the third grade. The kind of laughter where you feel guilty not because of the humor is "wrong" but because it's an easy target that's been satirized inelegantly and without much thought.

The whole Vito/Brokeback plotline is an embarrassment not only for the lack of subtlety with which it's being handled but the sheer fact that it's still kicking around 2+ years after it first appeared. This show has never been great about following through on all its tantalizing plot threads (the "where's the Russian" storyline has been reduced to an in-house gag amongst the writers, who have essentially taken a "fuck 'em" attitude towards that fan favorite episode) and yet this of all things is what Chase is going to bring back as a potential plot crux. I know some people believe that this is how Vito will be quickly written out of the show (to paraphrase Sean Burns "he's been Feeched") but I have my doubts, especially after having Eugene kill himself a couple episodes back. Chase is either going to have to follow through on this nonsense or risk being repetitive and neither's especially appealing at this point.

But let's talk about the elephant in the room (pun unfortunately intended) for a second that no one seems to want to address, and that would be the sheer comedic mileage the show and Buscemi get out of Allegra Sacramoni played by Little Steven's daughter Caitlin. Just when I'd actually started to buy the sincerity of John and Ginny's love for one another (Curatola's eyes always seem to go to a place whenever he talks about her that really makes me start to buy into Hallmark notions of love being blind) we're introduced to the offspring and we realize the show still wants to have its cake and eat it too. Call it Muriel's Wedding for people with rafter seats. Scene after scene gives us sight gags and quips ("a fifty pound bundle of joy") and less than flattering wedding gowns to remind us of what Clarice Starling put best: yes she was a big girl. Yes the shot of the two Sacramoni daughters looking like they've just just walked from the "Jack Sprat" nursery rhyme is priceless as was the towering silhouette shot of bride and groom with the former dwarfing the latter, but it's the sort of ugliness I expect from the characters not the people who created them. (I almost feel bad for airing these grievances since it paints a picture of me being far more sensitive to these matters than I really am; it’s just something about this one really struck a nerve)

Still, after much of the first part of the season was a decidedly dour affair it's good to see the show's moving with a spring in its step as it introduces some glorious story possibilities underneath a whacked homage to the first act of "...One" (my favorite part of the exchange between Chris and Tony was when Chris argued that the plan to out-source the hit on Rusty was "pussy ass," or words to that vulgar effect and Tony just gives him a look of tired annoyance like "I don't have the energy to give the reprimand that idiocy deserves, so you get a pass"). Also, physics and verisimilitude be damned, that bit with Tony re-asserting himself as Alpha Male was great not only because it was basically visual storytelling for dummies (nah he's my brother in law, nah he's old, nah this random guy's been my wet nurse all episode long and is a flabby fuck to boot, etc...) which tellingly I always enjoy, but also because of how closely it mirrors Feech La Mana's prison tale of finding "the biggest, blackest, motherfucker in the yard" and beating him senseless. Tony may not be learning anything from his sessions with Melfi, but he's not letting the wiseguy tales slip by unnoticed.

Matt Zoller Seitz said...

Andrew writes, "the show still wants to have its cake and eat it too."

Yep, and that's the root of every grievance I've ever lodged against it. It's what separates it from the superior THE WIRE and DEADWOOD, and makes the latter seem like improvements on THE SOPRANOS, the series that made THE WIRE and DEADWOOD possible. It's what me complain, before the second season of THE SOPRANOS had even begun, that where depicting these mobster characters was concerned, the show wanted to seem honest without really being honest -- to walk us to the edge of the cliff and then turn us around and walk us right back.

I'm wandering a bit off-topic here, but --- Oddly, the first GODFATHER movie was guilty of the same sin; it wanted to show the darkness of gangster life, yet it still shielded its characters from the harshest judgment by stressing how much they loved their families, how they weren't drug dealers like those other families, how they never killed anybody who didn't deserve it, etc. GODFATHER II rectified this special pleading somewhat -- how did that dead prostitute end up in the senator's bed anyway? -- but by G III it was cranked up to full-force, asking us to cry for Michael, who was no longer the hollow-eyed monster we saw at the end of Part II, but was suddenly being presented as a charming old man with a fashionable brush-cut who looked and sounded suspiciously like Al Pacino the actor. That trilogy was nearly monumental pop art, all things considered, but no intellectually honest person can plausibly claim that it didn't take its share of moral/dramatic shortcuts, and that claim can't be made for THE SOPRANOS either.

Frankly, it's why I'm dreading the rest of this extra-long SOPRANOS season. I would like to see Tony try (perhaps try and fail) to redeem himself because that would partly redeem some of the show's glibness and ugliness -- restrospectively. A Hail Mary pass, so to speak, in the game's final stretch.

Something tells me Chase is too much the cynic to really go there, though. More likely if he does show Tony trying to go straight, it'll just be a setup to vindicate Darwinian rules of gangsterism -- never say you're sorry, it makes you look weak. Andrew's comment about taking lessons from Feech instead of Melfi is right on. Deep down I think that's what Chase really believes in -- the law of the jungle. I wouldn't be surprised, in fact, if Tony tried to reform, or at least improve in some small way, and this decision is what sealed his fate, and instead of feeling bad for him, the series laughed at him for being so stupid.

William said...

Through the episode Tony scans his crew of jackals, seeing they are enjoying their physical wellness while he's hobbling around trying not to rip open an incision in his stomach. Not only did Tony need to "throw Mr. Muscles a beatin'" the show needed it. It needed that "I'm back" moment even if didn't seem plausible and it didn't. But like stated previously maybe Mr. Muscles held back from throwing Jersey's own favorite boss his own beatin'.

Nice observation on the gay theme from The Wire. I thought that was so well handled, maybe for the first time in television history.

I was kind of taken back when Phil was trash talking John at the wedding to Tony's crew. That was way out of line for a guy in Phil position to publically go there but then again we are talking about a bunch of jackals.

JRE said...

I'd like to offer a brief appology for Vito's leather bar scene. Sure it was cheap laughs, and I understand and identify with the "of all the subplots that have dropped they bring back THIS one?" frustration. But we've already estabished that mobsters are into the more transgressive elements of sex (i.e., Richie and Janice, Ralphie and Janice, Tony and Svetlana). So, I think the scene is defensible within the narative of the story, even if formally it was a cheap shot.

Anonymous said...

Hi Matt et al. -

As usual, good comments on the show, though I don't share any of the gallery's worries about this season. I was gonna write a long response here but posted it to my own blog - basically talking about comparisons between The Sopranos and Deadwood, and why the former may well be the 'greater' show even if it's not the 'better' show - if that makes sense. That article is here:

http://waxbanks.typepad.com/blog/2006/04/johnny_sacks_we.html

Maybe because everything on the show is so freighted it's hard to play as subtly as on Milch's show; still, extremity and catharsis of Tony's misadventures aren't to be found, in my estimation, on more controlled social-portrait shows. I hate Tony and love him; I can't feel either way about Swearengen, because Milch doesn't offer him so simply to the audience. Perhaps that's a result of Milch's own extraordinary moral consciousness, I dunno.

In any case - good article, and a good thread! Hope my post has something worthwhile in it. (It's a bit windy.)

Anonymous said...

Heh. Me again - forgot to sign that last post. :)

--Wally (Wax Banks)

vanya_6724 said...

Maybe I'm pazzo but I didn't find Tony's beat down implausible at all. Strong guys who work out a lot aren't necessarily great fighters - Tony has the agression and the experience, and was relentless enough that he never gave the kid a chance to retaliate. The establishing shots of Tony surveying the guys in the room were what made that scene plausible to me. I read it that Tony picked the kid on purpose knowing that he looked strong but was hot-tempered and inexperienced enough that Tony had a reasonable chance of taking him out before it became a real fight. Tony wouldn't have dared challenge the real gangsters. So I can accept that scene.

What I thought was ridiculous was the idea that Vito would parade around in a local gay club. Wouldn't he be well aware that other mobsters collect there? Anyway, now that he's been outed I hope he and Finn get together. Finn and Meadow doesn't make any sense to me.

Amos Magliocco said...

While this wasn't a stand-alone episode, at least it presented an identifiable storyline right away: the incarcerated boss's daughter is marrying, and the US Marshal Service and the Five Families (plus the “glorified crew” from North Jersey) will be made to enjoy each others company for six hours. Any fan of gangster fiction had to relish such a rich setup, and Sopranos fans know that such a tantalizing external conflict usually (at least in the good old days) signaled a mechanism for more textured and complex interrogations of our favorite characters. The way Winter’s episode contrasted Tony's new resolve to enjoy life against his persistent notions about the danger of showing weakness offered the first genuine complication (in a good way) of this character in a long time.

Buscemi's direction was story-conscious and imaginative. As Matt mentioned, he is not afraid to expand the shot and therefore create a more autonomous narrative intelligence so that we’re not simply watching Tony puke after a fight. We also understand that this is a representative moment; the costs of Tony’s choices in this instant and others are accumulating. The bill is coming due.

I didn't have a problem with Tony whipping the gym rat. Tony's a street fighter. Just because Hercules eats a pound of creatine for breakfast and can write "programs" for others to look like him doesn't mean he's going to stand a chance against somebody like Tony or Paulie.

I admit laughing out loud at Vito's Judas Priest garb but later thought it was indeed a cheap payoff for such a long-term plotline, as well as unlikely that Vito would appear in a place where collections were made.

Matt Zoller Seitz said...

Just to clarify: I'm not saying I couldn't buy Tony being able to beat up Mr. Muscles. I just didn't believe he could inflict such a savage beating in his weakened condition.

Matt Zoller Seitz said...

Here's that Wax Banks post on SOPRANOS/DEADWOOD in clickable form: right here.

Matt Zoller Seitz said...

Also, as the Hartford Courant's TV critic Roger Catlin observes, when Vito leaves to go to the bar, his wife is watching "Imitation of Life."

Dale said...

It was a classic maneuver by the Feds, letting the Sack's daughter wedding limo ALMOST pull away before moving in for the humiliation.
Get an audience out there before 'depantsing' Johnny in front of the crowd.
The government's reduced to being incompetents most of the time, so this was refreshing- and wouldn't doubt they're setting Christopher up somehow on the "Ali Baba" gun deal, getting back to the conversation in the premiere.

And Vito has no choice in killing his peers from the gay bar; talk about a man who can't improvise ("This is a joke."???- Come on, like the mob would find gay humor amusing? "This is a joke"??? Hello- Rip Taylor buckets of confetti here... Get Me).

Because we didn't see a suicide this week, I'm sure he'll retaliate- Remember Carm's warning about Vito. He's about to shake it up and then seek witness protection because he can't off himself.

This convinces me now of his intention w/ Finn last season now. When Finn discovered the carnal act at the construction site.
It wasn't obvious THEN if Vito was trying to feel Finn out at the time, seduce him, or just set-up a murder. Now I'm convinced he'd killed him and explain how Meadow's boyfriend never showed.

Anonymous said...

Don't get me wrong, Tony is a filthy-man-beast, but when he (the "convalescent") straight up opened a can of whipass on his hulkish, young driver, to say I was a bit incredulous is an understatement. And Buscemi's deft touch when directing the build-up left me even more annoyed at the climax. It felt heavy-handed and implausible--much like the joke outting creeepy Vito--two adjectives the previous 4 episodes exquisitely avoided. (The rest of the episode stacked up quite well against its predecessors though.) The thing is, the same goal (to re-assert Tony's authority i.e. "I'm back") could have been accomplished by Tony picking the fight and merely not getting HIS ass kicked. If they had tussled to a draw and Tony been able to walk away--seemingly--with dignity, no serious injury, and after having landed some nice blows, could his henchmen possibly think any less of him considering his physical condition? Of course not. He would have risen in their estimation--checkmate. The climax, in my eyes, just lacked restraint and Tony ended up coming off as some sort of superhero when all he needed to do was come off as fearless.

Edward Copeland said...

One other thing I forgot to mention: I guess we know now that the Sopranos still subscribe to the Star-Ledger, since Carmela went down the driveway to pick it up. Tell us Matt, have you ever seen a headline in your paper that comes close to "Don Squirrely-one?"
On other note: Why didn't Johnny's crew kill Frankie Valli back when they took care of Patti D'Arbanville and Joe Santos?

Vanya_6724 said...

I don't think fearless was enough. I think Tony had to appear vicious and unpredictable. Remember, people have to be scared of Tony, not just respect him.

I'm going to have to rewatch the fight. Remember real fights aren't like boxing. If you can land a good first blow - and Tony did - you can disable your opponent pretty quickly. And Tony isn't a superhero - he's clearly paying for the effort at the end with the bloody vomit, and we don't know yet how much damage he's done to himself.

Anonymous said...

Two things struck me about this episode. The first was the smile on Vito's face in the gay bar--he looked for the first time ever like a man who was enjoying himself. And seeing that made me realize that most of these people are miserable fucks at the best of times.

The second thing which rang true for me was when Melfi advised Tony how to maintain alpha status. In my own experience of therapy it went from working on some fundamental issues to the therapist becoming a kind of life coach for dealing with daily issues. Which is what seems to be happening with Melfi. As someone else pointed out, she becomes complicit in Tony's criminality. However I'm not at all sure that this reveals Chase's disdain for therapy. (Sorry Matt.) A friend of mine had a sociology prof who taught the underlying tenet that life is conflict. It follows that there are conflicts in the psychology biz too.

Anyway, the consensus here seems to be that the show is great and you won't get any conflict on that from me. I'm beginning to think that it rivals The Wire. The Soprano's canvas is broader and it takes more risks, which I think make it a contender against The Wire's laserlike focus on plot and character. Anyway, I'm grateful for both shows and marvel that we have Time/Warner to ultimately thank for them.

Matt Zoller Seitz said...

Edward: Alan Sepinwall's column (linked above) also deals with the headline issue. But to answer your question, no, the Ledger wouldn't run that sort of headline. That's more a New York Post/New York Daily News headline.

In terms of overall tone, the Ledger gives writers a lot of leeway to tell a story. But generally speaking, the headlines are pretty straightforward. And the tabloid style writing only goes on in first person columns, in the sports section and in a few other places, but never in a straight-up news story.

Vanya: Hold off on that play-by-play. I just talked to Alan Sepinwall and he has his own take on the fight, which includes a detailed description. He'll post shortly.

Matt Zoller Seitz said...

Dear anonymous or anonymi: When you post, could you please click on the middle box ("Other"), make up a screen name and stick with it? These comments are useful but I'm getting confused as to which anonymous is which.

Alan Sepinwall said...

Play-by-play: Tony sucker-punches Perry, then, when Perry charges him, he traps his lead arm and hits him with a few body shots until Perry crumples onto the floor. That beating wasn't about physical strength or age vs. youth; it was about will vs. immaturity, street smarts vs. gym-built muscles. Tony knows how to fight; Perry doesn't, and Tony made sure Perry didn't get a chance to get a shot in.

The way I see it, Tony picked Perry as his victim for four reasons:

1)As I said, Perry's an overgrown kid who's never learned how to fight (note in the road rage scene that he says "count ten" instead of "count to ten," like he's five years old);

2)Perry's the only guy in the room who would actually be hot-headed enough to swing back (Paulie could kick the crap out of Tony in his current condition, but Paulie knows you don't strike the boss), and it's a more impressive beatdown because Perry didn't just roll over;

3)The flip side of that is that while a Paulie can't swing on Tony, Tony's not really supposed to hit a made guy without a good reason (look at the reaction to him pounding on Ralphie in "University"), and Perry had the lowest status of anyone in the room;

and

4)The muscles. Tony knows the kid can't fight, but all the others are going to see is that Tony beat down some Vin Diesel-looking behemoth.

Amos wrote: "as well as unlikely that Vito would appear in a place where collections were made."

I talked to Terry Winter, and he said the leather bar was in New York, which is what I had assumed. Vito has no idea what New York is up to, collections-wise, and I'm assuming the mob in general doesn't get into business with gay bars. (The two NY soldiers seemed to be collecting from the bartender personally, not the establishment.) This also explains why Silvio and the others hadn't heard about Vito several days later, when those soldiers were clearly ready to report him to someone.

Matt Zoller Seitz said...

Again, I believe Tony could beat up Mr. Muscles, but I persist in thinking that he'd rip open his stitches while he did it, or keel over. The guy got exhausted going through a metal detector!

As anonymous noted above, the same dramatic endpoint could have been accomplished less ludicrously. "If they had tussled to a draw and Tony been able to walk away--seemingly--with dignity, no serious injury, and after having landed some nice blows, could his henchmen possibly think any less of him considering his physical condition? Of course not. He would have risen in their estimation--checkmate. The climax, in my eyes, just lacked restraint and Tony ended up coming off as some sort of superhero when all he needed to do was come off as fearless." I agree completely. Tony could beat this kid on almost any other day, but not on this one. I think he'd have doubled over in pain after taking one swing.

All this is fixating on a pretty minor point, but I do think it's symptomatic of the show's tendency to take shortcuts for effect.

Alan Sepinwall said...

Why do you think he was puking up blood, Matt? Because he ripped his stitches with that stunt.

In the context of this show, Tony is a bit of a superman, and always has been. And the idea of a hobbled hero putting on a brief display of strength before retreating to heal is such a tried-and-true device that even Milch used it last year with Swearengen on "Deadwood."

Matt Zoller Seitz said...

Alan: Still thought it was overdone, sorry. Not budging. So set in opinions that complete sentences not possible. Minor point, though. Moving on.

Alan Sepinwall said...

Can't... move... or... speak... at... normal... rate...

(Bonus points for the first person to identify it without Google.)

Alonso duralde said...

Alan Sepinwall writes:

I'm assuming the mob in general doesn't get into business with gay bars.

Pardon me while I literally LOL. In the pre-Stonewall days, ALL the gay bars in New York were either run by or paying protection to the mob, since the people inside could be arrested just for congregating. (There was even a law in New York state until the mid-1960s that made it illegal to serve alcohol to a homosexual.) The Stonewall riots, in fact, were kicked off because the cops scheduled a raid without warning the bar owners, which they were usually paid to do.

Trust me, the mob and gay bars have a LONG history.

I wasn't bothered by the ridiculousness of Vito's leather gear -- why should his taste in fetish wear be any better than Paulie's coiffure aesthetics or Tony and Carm's choice of bed linens?

It would have been funnier to out Vito by having him say, "Oo! Imitation of Life!" on his way out the door, though.

Alonso duralde said...

P.S. That would be a Katamari Damacy reference, Alan.

Dr. Hibbert said...

By tomorrow you'll barely be able to breathe.

Jay said...

Arrgh! Hate this game! Thanks, Alan. Now I'll be thinking about this all day.

I'm picturing Bart Simpson but for the life of me, I couldn't (if I'm right) tell you the episode.

Alan Sepinwall said...

Dr. Hibbert got it, and in looking up this link, I realize that I screwed up the quote. Sciosa actually says "Can't... lift... arm..." instead of "Can't... move..."

One of the great disappointments of my life is that the Yankees have only had six of the nine members of the SNPP softball team on their roster. Maybe Sciosa can replace Torre in a few years, Ozzie can be the infield coach and Griffey... well, Griffey never wants anything to do with the Yanks. C'est la vie.

Anyway, back to the thread I hijacked. Sorry for the ignorance re: gay bars, Alonso. I did think protection might be an obvious racket, then dismissed it.

Louis said...

Excellent look at Sunday's episode and some interesting follow-up posts -- what a thread!

Not much to add here, except that while I thought Tony's "mercy fuck" line was really funny, the scenes in Melfi's office feel played out. Every time I see one, I think, "Okay, I get it. Enough, already."

And one other thing -- I agree that the Middle Eastern guys are Feds. This first (three-quarters?) season will end with Chris facing the choice between flipping and going to prison. Then, the "mini-season" will be all about the attendant panic and how it hastens the disintegration of Tony's families.

Edward Copeland said...

From Alan's piece:
"Hypocrisy, thy name is Paulie Walnuts. A week ago, he's sobbing like a baby in the hospital hallway, and last night he's all too eager to join Phil's pile-on about Johnny's tears."

Paulie has always been a hypocrite -- remember back in Season 1 when he admitted to seeing a shrink, but criticized Tony going to one because she was a woman instead of man.

Edward Copeland said...

I'm not so certain the Middle Eastern guys are feds, but that's a possibility too. I lean toward thinking they are actually terrorists that Christopher is getting unwittingly involved with.

Matt Zoller Seitz said...

Edward writes, "I lean toward thinking they are actually terrorists that Christopher is getting unwittingly involved with." I hope not, because no matter what they do, it'll probably seem contrived and lame. Undercover feds would be lame, too, but at least there would be the possibility of some jokes at Chris' expense. The best option would be if they actually were what they claim to be -- petty gangsters.

Ross Ruediger said...

Just found this link to a moderately interesting interview with Gannascoli. FYI.

KJ said...

Best line for me was Carm shouting across the room, "Tony, it's the rollatini!"

You're right, Matt, Tony taking on "Mr Bloomfield" was completely unbelieveable. Not in his condition, no way does he make that move. And the gay bar scene was too much. Vito's exposure could've been handled much more effectively.

I'm hoping the middle-easterners do turn out to be terrorists, but that Chase goes somewhere deep, really deep with it. So many times in this series they seem content to just skate.

Bernardo Provenzano, the boss of bosses of the Sicilian mafia, on the lam for forty years, was brought to justice today in Italy. He had been hiding out in a farm in the hilltop village of- are you guys ready for it?- Corleone. Sweet.

RICHARD LEARY said...

The idea that a mob boss must be able to kick ass personally is ridiculous. Carmine ran the New York branch right up until he dropped dead, while Jackie Aprile remained in charge of the Jersey branch while he succumbed to cancer. And the Naples branch was headed by a beautiful woman! Feech's approach may have made sense in a prison context, but not in a group of made men and wannabes. Given the risk to his own health, Tony's taking on Mr. Muscles was a stupid move.

The sense of Tony having been weakened comes not from his diminished physical capacity but from his giving in to Johnny Sack on the Barone Sanitation deal and then on the hit on Frankie Valli's character, combined with his "every-day's-a-blessing" bliss. Plus his troops are obviously slacking off. The scene when Tony arrived at headquarters to see Bobby playing hoops and the other tough guys sitting around working on nothing more productive than their tans reminded me of the scene in Patton where the new general (Patton) first comes upon the defeated and demoralized troops he's been sent to transform.

Gannascoli said in an AP interview that ran Monday that Vito's being gay was his suggestion, offered in the hope of making his character more prominent. Gannascoli also said that there was a gay mobster in New York, who remained not only alive but a member in good standing because he was good at his work.

As for Vito risking exposure by dancing in Village People attire at a leather bar, one thing recent decades, from Wilbur Mills cavorting with Fanne Foxe to Clinton getting serviced by Monica, have taught us is that horniness can overcome caution and self-preservation.

Nicanor said...

I thought it was a pretty middle of the road episode. On Vito in his leather outfit, my girlfriend said; 'Why would he be dressed as a cop?' So, I am not sure what shows or internet sites my girlfriend has been visiting. To me most of the episode seemed pretty heavy handed in the pay-offs. I think the creative people on the show were the muscle man/driver taking on Tony Soprano. Tony made the first move, then the muscle man/driver telegraphed everything he wanted to try in the fight, and so Tony was able to beat him down.

Tony said in the past that all guys like him either end up dead, or in the can. I am wondering if David Chase can do either to his creation though, and please the viewers. He may be able to, that would be a crowning acheivement.

Eve M. in Toronto said...

From Eve M. Toronto

I agree with Matt's comment that for those living in or on the fringes of mob life, there are the "obvious downsides" of incarceration or death." But few of the law-breaking characters we've met on the SOPRANOS have ended up in jail.

I recently went back to the beginning of the series and watched Tony's first visit to Melfi's office where he complained rather bitterly about his colleagues: "Today no one has time for the penal experience."

Well, Johnny Sack has learned he must find the time, and I assume that he will do the time -- although I hope Chase will let him "come out" again, like Boo Radley.

Played with great skill and intensity by Vincent Curatola, Johnny has always been one of my favourite SOPRANOS characters. He is a foil for Tony, the Everyman mobster, who doesn't look the part. Johnny Sack does: the hooded eyes, the cigarette held in an almost feminine way inside a hooked finger, the sharp designer suits and ties, the sleek imported sports car (by the way, didn't we see Christopher, who was circling like a buzzard around the Sacrimonis' dwindling fortunes, pull up in the same car an episode or two earlier?)

In this episode, I loved watching convict John Sacrimoni shed his orange prison uniform like a snake shedding its skin, and seeing the tuxedo-clad Johnny Sack emerge (complaining about the unstylish patent leather shoes picked out for him).

Did I feel sorry watching him pay the ultimate social price for his sins -- the father-of-the-bride being dragged away by the Feds in full view of his wife and daughter, not to mention the 400 guests who had just taken part in the "Imitation of Life" wedding festivities ($425 K worth of ill-gotten lobster, cymbidium orchids and a bad DJ)? Not a bit.

But this is the artistry of the SOPRANOS. In Tony, Chase and Gandolfini have created a full and complex character who is more than the sum of all his evil deeds. I have no doubt that had this been Meadow's wedding and it was Tony Soprano breaking down in tears while he was being dragged away, our hearts would have broken, just a little bit.

Matt Zoller Seitz said...

Eve M. writes: "In this episode, I loved watching convict John Sacrimoni shed his orange prison uniform like a snake shedding its skin."

A beautiful analogy. And how sad for Johnny that he had to put the skin back on six hours later. Does anyone on this show really get to shed his/her skin? Does Chase even think such a thing is possible? I wonder.

Anonymous said...

Regarding Tony's fight, here's a theory that isn't mine:

The idea is that Tony picked Perry to pummel because he "appears" to be the toughest guy in the room. But, Tony is not completely crazy. In fact the selection of Perry is carefully calculated because Tony knows he can beat him. How does he know? At the beginning of the show, Tony is admiring Perry's right bicep. There appears to be a small transverse scar on the upper arm. Tony knows the right arm has been injured and is weak. When they fight, Tony sucker punches him. When Perry gets back up to fight, Tony locks up the right arm, Perry screams "ah,, my arm!" and Tony slams him into the fridge.

Dave