By Matt Zoller Seitz
I first saw Alex Karpovsky's "The Hole Story" at the 2005 Independent Film Festival of Boston, where my first feature "Home" made its New England premiere. I fell in love with it and have not been able to get it out of my head. It's been on the festival circuit since then, and I hope it gets a theatrical distributor so that audiences have a chance to discover Karpovsky, a distinctive comic voice and significant American filmmaker.
"The Hole Story" is a merger of faux-documentary, psychological drama, media satire and cringe comedy that reminds me of early Albert Brooks (particularly his criminally underappreciated "Real Life" ), and not just because Karpovsky is a near-one-man-band who wrote and directed the movie as well as starring in it as "Alex Karpovsky." The picture's easygoing, icy-deadpan tone belies its structural complexity: it's presented as sort of a salvage job, an "actual" documentary about a disastrous documentary film-that-never-was, cobbled together from pieces of an aborted pilot for a proposed cable series on weird but true phenomena, hosted by Karpovsky. Karpovsky brings a crew to Brainerd, Minn., to interview locals about an immense, unexplained hole that appears each winter in the middle of an iced-over lake. Unfortunately for Karpovsky, it just so happens that the winter he picks to visit Brainerd is the winter the hole finally decides to seal up.
Desperate to justify his filmmaking expedition, and stubbornly refusing to concede getting his ass kicked by fate, Karpovsky contrives to have residents talk about the ice hole on camera in the present tense, as if it's still open. After a while, even he recognizes the pointlessness of this contrivance. Yet he still continues to wander around Brainerd, looking for a subject, any subject. Karpovsky's increasingly pathetic attempts to justify his stillborn project (and by extension, his artistic existence) are partly fueled by a personal crisis I won't reveal here. In lesser hands, this story could have degenerated into standard-issue film-about-filmmaking cliches. But Karpovsky's striking mix of modes, coupled with his parched comic tone and mock-monumental wide shots (the more agitated and melodramatic our hero becomes, the more likely the director is to draw back and back, rendering him a ranting flyspeck on white snow), make this movie impossible to pigeonhole.
Karpovsky has been somewhat coy about the genesis of this movie, which the Boston Globe described as a "fictumentary." As far as I can tell from his various accounts, in 2002 he temporarily took a break from a job editing Russian karaoke videos and went to Kokomo, Indiana to make a documentary about the "Kokomo Hum," an unexplained sound heard by local residents. Emboldened by positive response to that project, he moved on to Brainerd, where 21 degree temperatures froze him and his crew, ruined his equipment and sent the project into a spiral from which it never recovered. The crew abandoned him and Karpovsky eventually had a breakdown and checked himself into a clinic for evaluation; the resulting film is, he has said, somewhat of a merger between his life and the botched documentary he originally set out to make. I suspect only Karpovsky can say whether the "interviews" with Brainerd locals being asked to lie about the ice hole, for instance, are "real" or invented, or what other parts of the film were captured in the moment or contrived after the fact. Whatever the ratio of reporting to drama, the entire project represents the end product of an unprecedented act of improvisation, devised on the fly by Karpovsky. It's truly unhinged -- like a Neorealist comedy directed by Ross McElwee.
There's really no reason why the movie should have worked at all, and I wouldn't be foolish enough to suggest that it'll click with everyone. (I've recommended it to many people, and about half of them find it willfully strange, and more mortifying than funny.) But it was one of my favorite unreleased films of last year, one of the saddest and funniest debuts I've ever seen, and therefore the ideal candidate to launch what I hope will be a regular feature calling attention to tiny movies that deserve big audiences.
Wednesday, January 04, 2006
Release this movie: The Hole Story
Labels:
Matt Zoller Seitz,
Movie Reviews
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
11 comments:
I saw this film last fall and absolutely loved it. It was smart, funny, insightful and very original. I don't know if its playing festivals or what, but try to see this thing if you get a chance - you won't regret it!
I wish Albert Brooks could see it. He would immediately recognize a kindred spirit.
I saw this film at a small festival several weeks ago and thought it was amazing. This guy (the director plays the main role) has wit, depth, sincerity, balls, and a dry comic sensibility that keeps growing and growing on you. It's completely inexplicable to me why it hasn't yet found an audience and gotten into bigger fests. In my humble estimate it's a travesty. This film deserves to be seen.
That's the trick, isn't it -- getting it seen?
Any lurking distributors on this blog should link to Karpovsky's site and ask for a screener. This guy is an amazing filmmaker.
MOVIES,HBO and SHOW TIME: Hey Guys, I found a cool site that Saves me a bunch on Premium Movie Channels. Beats My Cable Hands Down, and it's ALL DIGITAL. Check this site out .**Movies**
I saw this film a fe days ago and was blown-away. Alex took a chance and it paid off (though based on the very long editing process it seems it wasn't easy). Not only is it funny, moving and smart, but I can also say I've never seen a movie quite like it. Indeed, it may not be for everyone (some in the crowd seemed a bit puzzled at times) but personally I can't speak highly enough about it. It's a refreshing reminder that you can still make a good movie without a budget, stars, violence or nudity (though, I guess, this is probably why you've never heard of it…). Keep an eye on this guy. He's got something to say and has carved an innovative approach to say it.
Just caught Alex's film at the DCIFF and *loved* it. The Brooks comparison makes sense, although it reminded me a bit of Ross McElwee, too.
Writing a review now, but I tend to agree that Alex, whom I had a chance to meet at the festival, is someone to watch.
Okay, missed the McElwee comparison the first time I read your review...
saw the film in seattle this afternoon and absolutely loved it. it's completely innovative and refreshing (and hilarious) and deserves to be seen. where did this guy come from? (he wasn't at the screening, which was at the seattle true independent film festival). the film's website doesn't reveal much and googling didn't get me very far...
wherever he is, whoever he is, I look forward to seeing more and hope some distributor out there takes a gamble and makes this film available.
Caught the film yesterday at the Newport Int'l Film Festival. Hilarious, perceptive, critical, original and, ultimately, quite powerful. In short, a great little indie and a very very impressive debut. I spoke with Alex (the writer/director/actor/illusionist) afterwards and he told me the film will be making its New York City premiere next Thursday (June 15th) through the Rooftop Films Series. (www.rooftopfilms.com). Being from New York, I will try to get as many people to come as I can and, if you’re also in the city, I ask you to do the same. This film deserves an audience!
i lived in brainerd minnesota my whole life and i didnt know about that dont even think its true
Post a Comment